2000s

2020




Considered the best photo of this century.
Together, protecting the future.

A lioness and her cub were crossing the Savannah, but the heat was excessive and the cub was in great difficulty walking. 
An elephant realized that the cub would die, and carried him in his trunk to a pool of water, walking beside his mother.  

2020 Table of Contents 

The more recent events are compiled on the top.  

December|
The National Anthem, "A Song of Prayer" by Jack V. Cowan
"Everything is Beautiful in Their Own Way" Written/Sung by Ray Stevens 
Trump’s Greatest Achievement, The president has exposed the rot and corruption of our ruling class. by Ben Weingarten 
Adriana Galván, new Dean of Undergraduate Education at  UCLA  


November
La Armada Invencible, organization dedicated to the study of the Spanish Armada of 1558
Bolivian Indigenous Aymara Women Mountain Climbers
The Roots of Our Partisan Divide, Christopher Caldwell, February, 2020 

October 
California Fires
Hispanic American Incomes Are Rising Faster Than Anybody Else’s by Noah Smith  
The $2.6 Trillion U.S. Latino Market: The Largest And Fastest Growing Blindspot Of The American Economy

September
Joseph Castro, new Chancellor of California State University 
Juan Sánchez Muñoz, new chancellor of the University of California, Merced. 
Milagros (Milly) Peña, new president of Purchase College, part of the State University of New York.

DFW Hispanic 100 To Honor Viola Delgado & Anette Landeros
Rosa Rosales, served as the 48th LULAC National President.
Remembering
Delta Air Lines flight 15, 9/11/01

August
1619 Project vs. The Great American Story: A Land of Hope
France's Cathedrals on Fire: 'The Final Stage of De-Christianization'? by Giulio Meotti
The Reality of Global Depopulation: 
International Organization for the Family

July
President Trump's July 4th Speech 
How to Refer to what you are:  Estadounidense - Norteamericano - Americano
National Museum of African American History and Culture removes and apologizes for racist page on it website

June
For the first time, Latinos are the largest group of Californians admitted to UC , by Teresa Watanabe, L.A. Times
Cuban Immigrant: “Communists” Are Trying to Take Over America

May 
The Reality of Global Depopulation
Family Statistics

April 
Youtube: Nuestra Herencia Hispánica  
Comments . . .Culture shock when going back to US by Carl Camp


March 
Caras y Caretas by Jose S. Alvarez, Founder 
“Mil Islas”, el paraíso de Oaxaca desconocido por los turistas
President Trump’s Pro-America Independence Day Speech, Mount Rushmore July 3, 2020
El Espanol de los Estados Unidos 

February 
The Roots of our Partisan Divide
Canadian, Ernie Meggisen's view of President Trump, who does not necessarily like Trump

January 
Condecorada la española que dio a conocer a Gálvez en Estados Unidos
10 part Video series on Human caravans and human slavery  .  . ???
Libro PDF - Nuestra América, una historia hispana de Estados Unidos por Fernández Armesto Felipe

DECEMBER 


The National Anthem, "A Song of Prayer" by Jack V. Cowan
"Everything is Beautiful in Their Own Way" Written/Sung by Ray Stevens 
Trump’s Greatest Achievement, The president has exposed the rot and corruption of our ruling class. by Ben Weingarten 
Adriana Galván, new Dean of Undergraduate Education at  UCLA  




The National Anthem

"A Song of Prayer"
by 
Jack V. Cowan 

 

                                         

The founding fathers of America were God Loving people and rarely did anything without recognizing God’s participation in their effort. In virtually every document, song or pledge God is included in honor and respect.  Our National Anthem is no exception and we of late seem to sing it without thinking of what it means. This is probably due to the fact that we only sing the first verse and have all but forgotten the last which makes it very clear that America is a gift based on a Trust in God and His Protection and His Guidance in our pursuit of a just cause. George Washington may not have been a great tactician but he was an expert at prayer.

The first verse is about realizing the power of God’s protection of America and its flag of freedom during the darkness of battle. It symbolizes God’s light giving proof of His gift of a free and enduring country based on love for each other and the courage to keep it free.

Oh, say! can you see by the dawn's early light
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming;
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?
And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there:
Oh, say! does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

The second verse tells of the doubt of the American adventure and the hidden dangers faced in navigating strange waters while keeping the enemy at bay. Those doubts erased at the dawn of God’s perfect Light shining on God’s gift of a land for free and brave people.

On the shore, dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In fully glory reflected now shines in the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner! Oh, long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

The third verse is a warning to those arrogant enemies who would keep America enslaved and to those who pay mercenaries to battle against America. They will be washed away by their own blood in terror and eternal death as nothing can stand against God and His Land of Free and Brave people.

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution!
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


This last verse is a pledge to God that the people of America will always stand between those of a warring nature and what is right as God’s power will always protect America if it’s cause is just – and if “In God we Trust”. And our Star - Spangled Banner stands as America’s rallying symbol of that Trust.

Oh, thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war's desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust":
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

So the next time you sing the National Anthem, do it as you would a prayer in honor of God and His United States of America.


 



"Everything is Beautiful in Their Own Way"
 Written/Sung by Ray Stevens 
The 50 Year Anniversary of the  receiver of two Globe Awards

Jesus loves the little children, all the little children of the world
Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight
Jesus loves the little children of the world

Everything is beautiful in its' own way
Like a starry summer night or a snow covered winter's day
Everybody's beautiful in their own way
Under God's heaven, the world's gonna find a way

There is none so blind as he who will not see
We must not close our minds, we must let our thought be free
For every hour that passes by, you know the world gets a little bit older
It's time to realize that beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder

Everything is beautiful in its' own way
Like a starry summer night or a snow covered winter's day
Ah, sing it children
Everybody's beautiful in their own way
Under God's heaven, the world's gonna find a way

We shouldn't care about the length of his hair or the color of his skin
Don't worry about what shows from without but the love that lives within
We're gonna get it all together now and everything gonna work out fine
Just take a little time to look on the good side my friend
And straighten it out in your mind

Everything is beautiful in its' own way
Like a starry summer night or a snow covered winter's day
Everybody's beautiful in their own way
Under God's heaven, the world's gonna find a way Writer/s: Ray Stevens

Lyrics licensed and provided by LyricFind
https://www.songfacts.com/lyrics/ray-stevens/everything-is-beautiful 
Hear Ray Stevens sing Everyone is Beautiful




Trump’s Greatest Achievement
The president has exposed the rot and corruption of our ruling class.

by Ben Weingarten

 November 18, 2020

No matter how the presidential election ends, one of President Donald Trump’s myriad achievements stands above all others: he has exposed the unprecedented degree of rot and corruption that pervades the American system. 

More specifically, Trump has exposed the ruling class: the bipartisan political establishment and its adjuncts in Big Tech, the corporate media, Big Business and Woke Capital, the academy, and across the commanding heights of American society. 

Trump’s manners engender hatred in the ruling class. Even more significantly, his tenacity in confronting the ruling class’s members with their failures—and the fact he has threatened to rectify those failures—discredits and disempowers those responsible for them. Their response—a perpetual effort to destroy him—has shown the ruling class to be lawless and tyrannical. 

Consequently, the ruling class has obliterated the institutions it claimed to be defending, revealing to those Americans not addled by Trump Derangement Syndrome that the emperor has no clothes.  Americans willing to look can now see that those institutions which ostensibly exist to serve us have no reservations about launching a full-scale assault on us if it serves their interests. 

Consider what we have learned about the leaders of the country in the last four years.  We learned that they would do everything in their power to destroy a president who takes them on: delegitimizing his election; baselessly demonizing and slandering him as a Nazi, racist, and bigot; lying perpetually through media conduits to undermine and smear him; pulling documents off his desk to subvert him; concocting false narratives meant to portray him as a traitor to justify spying on him and his confidantes; waging legal and political jihads aimed at toppling him; weaponizing national security, intelligence, and law-enforcement apparatuses to punish him and like-minded dissenters from the ruling class orthodoxy; impeaching him over his desires to root out political corruption; threatening to wear wires in a bid to entrap and remove him under the 25th Amendment; claiming obstruction of justice over rightful decisions to fire subordinates as he sees fit; illegally leaking information about the most sensitive of subjects concerning his policies while simultaneously invoking state secrecy to prevent the revelation of systematic ruling class corruption and criminality; and often engaging in outright insubordination.
On this last count, we learned that military leaders would publicly flout their commander-in-chief, overrule him on broadly popular policies like pulling troops out of aimless and endless wars or protecting American cities from rioting mobs, and openly entertain scenarios of forcibly removing him from office. 

We learned that our courts—up to the highest court in the land—would hold such a president to a different standard than other presidents. When the government itself dropped its case against one of the president’s chief advisors—ensnared in some of the previously described machinations—the judge overseeing the case stepped in as prosecutor himself to continue the persecution. Traitors to the ruling class are treated as below the law. 

The ruling class’s hatred of the president, and its efforts to destroy him, were of course a proxy for its desire to destroy what he represents. What he represents is not just the policies it despises, but the people it despises. This includes the 71 million commonsense, patriotic, traditional Americans who voted for him. Some adored the president. Others backed him as the ultimate middle finger pointed at a ruling class that frowned hatefully down upon them while claiming to be virtuous and magnanimous. 

Indeed, we learned that much of our ruling class believes those Americans to be deplorable, irredeemable, racist, bigoted, backwards, Russia-supporting traitors and Nazis. 

We learned that the ruling class would hound such opponents of its rule in public, pursue their families, friends, and colleagues, and destroy them reputationally, financially, and legally. 

We learned that the ruling class’s Big Tech oligarchs would muzzle such Americans. 

We learned that the ruling class’s communications arm—the media—in hock with federal officials, would engage in rampant, sophisticated information warfare efforts against them. 

We learned that the ruling class’s Big Business and Woke Capital titans would seek to enforce their new religion in the workplace, lest any dissenting Americans slip past their HR departments. 

We learned that the ruling class would excuse, if not underwrite and cheer on, rioters as they looted and burned our cities—so long as it kept the ruling class in power. 

We learned that the ruling class was so cynical, it would leverage a pandemic to impose total control over the public, suspend the rights of political foes while privileging political friends, and systematically undermine the integrity of the voting process. 

This brings us to today. 

The Fix 

Today, half the country may never trust an election again, not because of the pending outcome, but because of the process by which we arrived at it. 

Everyone knows about chicanery in Democrat machine-run districts. But never has there been anything like what transpired at the apex of the perpetual coup on November 3rd. In the middle of an election night on which the president made historic gains with blacks and Hispanics and romped in the two bellwether states of Florida and Ohio; in which his Republican colleagues stunned pollsters by dominating Democrats in toss-up and even Democrat-favored races; in which the president was up by large margins in every major battleground state, suddenly, without explanation, the counting stopped. 

Were the machines kicking into gear to conjure up the votes needed to stop the catastrophe of the president winning re-election? Certainly such things had been done before in isolation, but in the urban centers of several states all at once? Could a fix of this magnitude really be in? 

The media had to that point refused to put clear Trump victories in the win column, while declaring Biden the winner in hotly contested states—ensuring Biden would not trail in the electoral college. Was this a conscious effort to set the narrative, or another coincidence? 

In the wee hours of the morning, suddenly tens of thousands of votes started to be reported from the bluest cities in the battleground states, some dumps apparently consisting of 100% Joe Biden votes, contradicting prior totals from those areas.

In the coming hours and days, parties fought and even defied court orders that Republicans be permitted to oversee the counting. Why were they hiding the counters?
 

Evidence grew of alleged “voting irregularities,” altered ballots, illegal ballots, dirty voter rolls, software “glitches,” unlawful ballot harvesting, and statistically improbable outcomes. 

A mass of recounts, audits, and related litigation are now pending. 

Every single one of these battleground states might have broken Joe Biden’s way in a normal election in which Americans cast their votes in person, with proper identification. 

But the foregoing has cast a shadow over our elections: the way in which the election count unfolded, seemingly breaking entirely in Biden’s favor after an election night freeze; the anecdotal and in some cases more robust evidence of corruption and fraud. Our faith in the integrity of our elections, and our republic itself, have been shaken. 

Never Forget 

That the media took it upon itself to coronate Joe Biden as the winner well before the counting was done, the recounts and audits undertaken, and the litigation adjudicated gave the further appearance that the fix was in. That certain world leaders—surely rooting for a return of “America Last” globalism—called to congratulate the former vice president, and that he stood up his transition so quickly, only further suggested a hasty effort to ram this election through. 

Anything that might arise subsequently to challenge the narrative will now be dismissed as an attempt to “undermine our democracy [never a republic],” “suppress the vote [by tossing illegal ones],” and “steal the election [obtain a legal, certifiable, official final tally].” If you express a desire to count legitimate votes, discard illegitimate ones, and get an accounting as to the how, why, and extent of any illegitimacy—to ensure your vote is not diluted and your voting rights are therefore not violated—you will be gulaged on social media and beyond. The fever dreams the ruling class previously telegraphed about dragging the president from the Oval Office will of course intensify the longer the process takes. 

Meanwhile, while Joe Biden is calling for “healing”—after an election in which he compared the president for whom 71 million people voted to Goebbels, called the only reporters who scrutinized him Russian traitors, and routinely badmouthed the country as a systemically racist bastion of evil—ruling class Resisters are feverishly drawing up their enemies lists.

This is who they are. This is what they believe.
 

For four years, President Trump has achieved major victories in the face of this opposition, making the country richer and stronger than it was when he assumed office. 

But his greatest achievement has been boldly and courageously standing up to this wounded bear of a ruling class, which has now shown America its true face. Americans’ eyes are now irrevocably open to what has become of their country, and what must be overcome to take it back. 

President Trump’s predecessors—Truman on the bureaucracy, or Eisenhower on the military-industrial complex, or Nixon on the corrupted media—scratched the surface of the challenges we face. But none exposed it so openly, and in such breadth and depth. 

If the history is written by the ultimate victors—and the house almost always wins—it may well be that this entire story is missed. Certainly, it will be misrepresented, warped, and glossed over in the most outrageous of ways. It will probably be censored too. 

Nevertheless, we must write it: For posterity, and for our fellow countrymen, in the here and now, more motivated than ever before to reclaim this land we love.

Ben Weingarten is a Claremont Institute Fellow, Senior Contributor at the Federalist, and a 2019 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow of the Fund for American Studies, under the auspices of which he is writing a book on U.S.-China policy and its bold transformation under the Trump administration. He is the author of American Ingrate: Ilhan Omar and the Progressive-Islamist Takeover of the Democratic Party. 

 



 

Adriana Galván

The UCLA College is pleased to announce the appointments of Adriana Galván as dean of undergraduate education effective July 1. A member of the UCLA faculty since 2008, Galván is professor of psychology and holds the Wendell Jeffrey and Bernice Wenzel Term Chair in Behavioral Neuroscience.

She is director of the Developmental Neuroscience Lab at UCLA; a faculty affiliate of the UCLA Brain Research Institute and the UCLA Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program; an executive committee member of the UCLA Staglin Center for Cognitive Neuroscience; and co-director of the NICHD T32 Predoctoral Training Program in Adolescent Brain and Behavioral Development.

Galván’s research, funded by the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and numerous private foundations, focuses on adolescent brain development and behavior, particularly in the domains of learning, motivation and decision-making.

Galván has served in various leadership and advisory roles in the Department of Psychology, the Division of Life Sciences, the UCLA Academic Senate and UC-systemwide. She earned her B.A. in neuroscience and behavior at Barnard College, Columbia University, and her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Cornell University. For more information, please visit the following link.

Galván will serve alongside the other four deans of the College who lead their respective divisions—Humanities, Life Sciences, Physical Sciences and Social Sciences. They all share responsibility for issues and functions that span the College, with one of them serving as senior dean.


This email was sent to mimilozano@aol.com | Unsubscribe
UCLA External Affairs
10889 Wilshire Blvd. Ste 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90024 US



NOVEMBER 


Alexandra Oliver-Davila, First Latina to lead Boston Public Schools, November 18, 2020
Corridos: “Singing Newspapers” and Community Organizers
Bolivian Indigenous Aymara Women Mountain Climbers



Alexandra Oliver-Davila, 
First Latina to lead Boston School Board
Elected Chairperson,
November 18, 2020


Alexandra Oliver-Davila, ChairpersonAlexandra Oliver-Dávila is a BPS parent. For more than 20 years, Alex has worked to create a community that supports Latino youth, values their input, and believes in their ability to create positive social change. Serving as Executive Director since 1999, Alex has transformed Sociedad Latina into a cutting-edge, data-driven, creative youth development organization. Under her leadership, Sociedad Latina has increased and diversified its budget, expanded board membership, increased the number of youth and families it works with and expanded programming.

Through her grassroots community-based approach, Alex has forged cross-sector collaborations with dozens of partners, including colleges, hospitals, businesses, foundations and schools. This broad network of partnerships has enabled Sociedad Latina to leverage resources and offer youth greater access and opportunities to thrive. In addition, Alex serves as a Community Advisory Board representative for Children's Hospital Boston, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, New England Baptist Hospital, Beth Israel and the Boston After School and Beyond. Alex also serves as the Vice-Chair of the Boston Public School Committee, a trustee of Emmanuel College, a trustee of the Anna B Stearns Foundation, a board member of the Coalition of Schools of Educating Boys of Color (COSEBOC) and was the previous co-chair of the Greater Boston Latino Network (GBLN).

In recognition for her hard work and dedication to the Latino community in Boston, Alex has received a number of honors and recognitions over the years. In 2018, Alex was selected by The Partnership to participate in the Next Generation Executive Leadership program and was named one of Boston’s Most 100 Influential People of Color by Get Konnected. In 2016 Alex was named one of YW’s 150 Women of Influence. Alex has been honored several times on El Planeta’s Powermeter 100 Most Powerful People for Massachusetts’ Latinos. In 2012, Alex received an Honorary Doctorate from Emmanuel College and the Hispanic Heritage Leadership Award from the National Football League. In 2007, Alex was honored as a Barr Foundation Fellow – a program that recognizes Boston’s most gifted and experienced leaders. She also received the Freedom House Community Leader Award in 2006 and the Boston Celtics’ Hero Among Us Award in 2002. During her career, Alex has also received honors from Mayor Thomas Menino, the Boston Police Department, and Boston City Council. Alex holds a Bachelor’s Degree from Emmanuel College and a Master’s in Public Policy from Tufts University.

Email: aoliverdavila@bostonpublicschools.org

Sent by Gil Sanchez gilsanchez01@aol.com 



POLITICAL SALSA Y MÁS with SAL BALDENEGRO 8.22.20 “CORRIDOS: SINGING NEWSPAPERS AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS””

August 22, 2020 by Tia Tenopia

Corridos: “singing newspapers” and community organizers…

 

http://3mfm1l4cvej73ntxf81gi3av.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/Teatro-Campesino-La-Carpa_300.jpg

The corrido, which tells a true story in song, has served us well over the years. It has informed and inspired us and has moved us to action. Corrido expert Celestino Fernández describes the corrido as “a descriptive narrative, a running account, written in verse, like poetry, and put to music. The emphasis is on the words and story, not on the music or voice.” (Source 1) Corrido scholar María Herrera-Sobek notes that the corrido is thriving in Mexico and in the United States. (Source 2)  

Luis Valdez’s La Carpa de los Rasquachis is an extended play based on the corrido musical tradition.

The corrido, which tells a true story in song, has served us well over the years. It has informed and inspired us and has moved us to action. Corrido expert Celestino Fernández describes the corrido as “a descriptive narrative, a running account, written in verse, like poetry, and put to music. The emphasis is on the words and story, not on the music or voice.” (Source 1) Corrido scholar María Herrera-Sobek notes that the corrido is thriving in Mexico and in the United States. (Source 2)

In a 1990 essay I stated that, “Before the days of radio and television … corridos actually served the purpose of informing people of events that were going on, a kind of a ‘singing newspaper’.” (Source 3) Fernández also uses a newspaper analogy: “Much like the editorial page of the local newspaper, the corrido takes a topic of importance and accurately and precisely documents the essential points, interprets them, and then provides commentary, advice, or recommendations.” (Source 1) The corrido also has been, and continues to be, a political vehicle, a means of organizing communities and of opposing attacks on our culture.

Foundational aspects of the corrido…

The Mexican corrido derives from the Spanish romances, “…short poems of regular meter and assonance which capture an intense and dramatic moment—of sorrow, of defeat, of parting, of return—in simple and direct language…” Romances in turn evolved from the cantares de gestas, “songs of great deeds.” (Source 4). Herrera-Sobek also notes the nexus between the corrido and the canción de gesta. (Source 2)


Folklorist Americo Paredes chronicled corridos about the Texas Mexico border.  

According to James Stamm, many Spanish romances of the XV century have as their theme, “…dramatic moments of the conflict between Moors and Christians in frontier (border) encounters (fronterizo ballads).” (Source 4) Anthropologist Américo Paredes, devotes a sizable portion of his classic collection of Texas Mexican/Chicano corridos to corridos that deal with XIX and XX century fronterizo (i.e., border) conflict between Texas-Mexicans and white/Anglo Americans. (Source 5) Fernández also notes that, “People have written and sung corridos on specific border themes, often of political and cultural clashes, since the nineteenth century.” (Source 1)

Both the Spanish romances/cantares de gestas and Mexican/Chicano corridos originated and flourished during intense periods of nationalism and cultural unity. In Spain this was during the first centuries of its existence as a cultural entity. In Mexico (and Mexican-dominant parts of the U.S.) these were the periods immediately before, during, and after the Mexican Revolution (1910 on). Fernández refers to the period from 1836 to the late 1930s as the “corrido century” for the U.S.-Mexico border. (Source 1) In the 1960s and the 1970s the Chicano Movement—whose foundation was an intense sense of nationalism and of cultural identity—produced an immense amount of literature, including songs and corridos.

Corridos have some common characteristics: They usually have verses of four or six lines, with established rhyme schemes, and are written in the popular vernacular, from a working-class perspective. Old-style corridos contain twenty or thirty verses, while modern corridos tend to be eight or ten verses. Corridos usually have an Opening (“This is the corrido of…”), a Middle (the story details), and a Closing (“The corrido ends here…”). Traditional corridos were performed simply by one individual accompanied by a guitar. Today corridos are performed in various musical genres, from mariachi to norteño. (Source 1)  

Folklorist Americo Paredes chronicled corridos about the Texas Mexico border.  
The Chicano Movement of the 1960s and 1970s gave corridistas great material with which to work.

The Chicano Movement of the 1960s and 1970s gave corridistas great material to work with—real heroes and heroines, a plethora of local issues, and broader movements such as the farm worker struggle and the fight to reclaim stolen land in New Mexico. Space limitations prohibit a full discussion of the immense and important role of corridos in our history. But the following examples give a good sense of their historical role in combatting negative depictions of Mexican Americans and as community organizing vehicles.

Corridos go to war…

World War I…

Mexican Americans served in great numbers in WW I. Historian Carole Christian, suggests that Mexican Americans were actually overrepresented in the WW I ranks due to Draft boards being very aggressive in getting Mexican Americans into the military. (Source 6) The corrido “Laredo,” popular circa 1920, describes the hostility that Mexican people in Laredo (Texas) experienced. But, in spite of that hostility, says the song, Mexican Americans fought valiantly, many losing their lives, under the U.S. flag in WW I, bringing honor and pride to the community. (Source 5)

http://3mfm1l4cvej73ntxf81gi3av.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/Texas-Mexcian-CancioneroFU-215x300.jpg

World War II…

About 750,000 Mexican Americans served in the military during World War II. Many of these didn’t wait to be drafted—they enlisted. “Soldado Raso” (simple, or common, soldier)—highlighting the bravery and patriotism of Mexicans/Chicanos—was a song of pride and inspiration for Mexican Americans going to war. WW II veteran and author Raúl Morín asserts that “Everywhere that Mexicans would gather, here and overseas (during WW II)…” they would sing “Soldado Raso.” (Source 7) “Los soldados olvidados de la Segunda Guerra Mundial” (The forgotten WW II soldiers) discussed below also references the immense contributions of Mexican Americans during WW II.

“Soldado Raso” was a popular song about Chicanos going off to World War Two.  

Vietnam…

Mexican Americans were overrepresented in Vietnam. According to Census reports, Mexican Americans comprised 11.8% of the population of the five (5) Southwestern states, yet the fatality rate of Chicanos from these states was over 19%. However, Chicanos with English last names are not represented by this figure nor are Chicanos from states other than the five (5) Southwestern states. “El hijo del soldado raso” (The son of the Soldado Raso) references the participation of Mexican Americans in the Vietnam War. (Source 8)

Corridos go to work…  

Mexican Americans have a very rich union-labor history. Much of that history has been memorialized in corridos and songs. The United Farm Workers struggle inspired many of these. The UFW’s Teatro Campesino (Farm Worker Theater) produced “¡Huelga En General!,” an LP album of their songs. Two members of the Teatro Campesino, Daniel Valdez and Augustín Lira, each produced an LP album containing songs referencing the farm worker struggle. Lalo Guerrero (the “father of Chicano Music”), wrote several corridos about the UFW struggle. Los Angeles schoolteacher José Luis Orozco produced an LP album that paid tribute to the UFW struggle. (Source 3)  

http://3mfm1l4cvej73ntxf81gi3av.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/Clifton-Morenci2_300.jpg Mining, a major industry in Arizona and other southwestern states, was dominated by Mexican American workers. Many corridos memorialize the dynamics of the workers fighting to obtain fair wages, safety regulations, and overall decent treatment and comment on the social dynamics of the times, such as housing discrimination, etc. A sampling:  

The “1903 Strike Corrido” is about a strike in Clifton, Arizona.

“El Corrido de San Pedro” about the Mexican neighborhood in the Arizona mining town of Hayden-Winkelman. “El Corrido de Morenci” about the eastern-Arizona mining town of Morenci. “El Corrido de la huelga” about the 1983 United Steelworkers Union strike against Phelps Dodge. “El corrido del minero,” which speaks to the hard lives of copper miners.

Two corridos are embedded in the documentary movie “Los Mineros,” which focuses on labor struggles of Mexican American miners in Arizona from 1903 to 1946. The “1903 Strike Corrido” is about a strike in Clifton, Arizona centered on fighting the “Mexican Wage” system whereby Mexican miners were paid less than white/Anglo miners for the same work. “Los Mineros Corrido” relates how after almost 50 years of struggle, Mexican American copper miners in Arizona miners achieved decent working conditions. (Source 9)

Corridos as organizers…

The UFW and miners-union songs and corridos served to inspire workers and to generate support for the unions involved. “El Corrido de Gregorio Cortez” and “El Corrido de Juan Reyna” were vehicles to organize the Mexican community. Cortez and Reyna were arrested for murder in the 1900s (Cortez in 1901 in Texas, Reyna in 1930 in California). The authorities considered Cortez and Reyna heartless killers, but the corridos portrayed Cortez and Reyna as having acted in self-defense and served to develop community support movements, and in Reyna’s case, to raise money for his legal defense. (Source 5)

“Los soldados olvidados de la Segunda Guerra Mundial” (The forgotten soldiers of WW II) was written by José “Pepe” Villarino and performed by “Los Románticos” as part of the 2007 Defend the Honor movement to protest a Ken Burns documentary on WW II that was aired on PBS that omitted entirely any mention of Mexican Americans. The song encouraged people to protest to PBS. (Source 10)  

http://3mfm1l4cvej73ntxf81gi3av.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/El-Paso-SkylinePD2-e1565392259365.jpg      Corridos are still inspiring and educating us…  

“El Llanto de El Paso, Texas” is a corrido about the 2019 racially motivated mass shooting of Mexican Americans in El Paso, Texas.  

Fernández notes that, “Corridos continue to share the news of the day, bringing this folk tradition into contemporary times.” (Source 1) Fernández gives some examples of these:

“Las Mujeres de Juárez” by Los Tigres del Norte is one of the numerous corridos that address the murders of over 300 women in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico during the 1990s.

“El Corrido de José Antonio Elena Rodríguez” by Celestino Fernández, in collaboration with Guillermo Sáenz, memorializes the murder of 16-year-old José Elena in 2012 by a U.S. Border Patrol agent who fired 16 bullets through the U.S.-Mexico border fence, from Nogales, Arizona into Nogales, Sonora, hitting José Elena 13 times.

Josué Rodríguez and Alejandro Ramos performed the corrido “El Llanto de El Paso, Texas” at a vigil three days after the 2019 racially motivated mass shooting of Mexican Americans at an El Paso, Texas, Walmart.

The murder of George Floyd by the police and the subsequent national and global demonstrations against police brutality have inspired several corridos. Among them are “No puedo respirar/El corrido de George Floyd” by Ayalas Band and “8 Minutos de Infierno” by Pedro Rivera, and an a capella home recording of “El Corrido de George Floyd” by Humberto Reyes.

Several corridos address the Covid-19 pandemic. Fernández suggests that the most popular of these might be the satirical and humorous “El Corrido del Coranvirus” by Los Tres Tristes Tigres. (Source 1)

Fernández asserts that the period from 1836 to the late 1930s has been dubbed the “corrido century” for the U.S.-Mexico border, and he predicts that a rival “corrido century” may be in the making. Let’s hope he’s right. c/s

Special Thanks to Christine Marín, Celestino Fernández, and José “Pepe” Villarino for their assistance.

_________________________________________________

Copyright 2020 by Salomon Baldenegro. You can reach Sal by writing: Salomonrb@msn.com

Source 1 Celestino Fernández, “Running Tales for the Times,” Border Lore: Heritage and culture of the U.S. Southwest and Northern Mexico, August 7, 2020.

Source 2 María Herrera-Sobek, The Mexican Corrido: A Feminist Analysis, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.

Source 3 Salomón R. Baldenegro, Chicano/Mexican Music as Literature: An Essay in Two Parts, Unpublished, 1990.

Source 4 James R. Stamm, A Short History of Spanish Literature, Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Co., 1967.

Source 5 Américo Paredes, A Texas-Mexican Cancionero, Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1976.

Source 6 Carole E. Christian, Joining the American Mainstream: Texas’s Mexican Americans During World War I, The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, Vol. 92, No. 4, April, 1989.

Source 7 Raúl Morín, Among the Valiant: Mexican-Americans in WW II and the Korean War, Los Angeles:  Borden Publishing Co., 1963.

Source 8 Freddy Gómez, Juan A Perez, “El Hijo Del Soldado Raso,” N.D.

Source 9 Los Mineros, Galán Productions, 1991.

Source 10 José ‘Pepe’ Villarino, “Los soldados olvidados de la Segunda Guerra Mundial,” Los Románticos, from the CD of the same name, 2007.

Photo of La Carpa de los Rasquachis and Chicano protesters copyrighted by Barrio Dog Productions, Inc. Photo of book cover used under face use proviso of the copyright law. All other photos in the public domain.

Filed Under: Blogs, Political Salsa y Más Tagged With: Political Salsa y Mas with Sal Baldenegro, Salomon Baldenegro

http://latinopia.com/blogs/political-salsa-y-mas-with-sal-baldenegro-8-22-20-corridos-singing-newspapers
-and-community-organizers/

 



Bolivian Indigenous Aymara Women 

That dress is the "typical" indigenous people women wear. However, it is based on XVI century Spanish women attire !... adopted by the Aymara women as well as the shawl and later on the hat.  That is their real name, INCA is the title of their king only !! They are all Aymara and their language is Aymara, they do not speak Inca, there is n such thing !


  OCTOBER  2020


October Table of Contents
California Fires
Hispanic American Incomes Are Rising Faster Than Anybody Else’s
by Noah Smith  

The $2.6 Trillion U.S. Latino Market: The Largest And Fastest Growing Blindspot Of The American Economy



The New York Times

California Fires

A member of the Lomakatsi Restoration Project conducts a prescribed burn to enhance
 a culturally-important oak habitat following ecological forestry thinning in Southern Oregon’s Colestin Valley.

Lomakatsi Restoration Project

Today, we’re sharing a deeper dive about how Indigenous Californians’ use of fire has long been dismissed. Now, though, as record-breaking wildfires continue to burn in California, there’s growing recognition of their expertise:

When Belinda Brown was a child, she would rise early in the morning every spring and fall to help her father and grandfather light the fields of the XL Ranch Indian reservation outside of Alturas, Calif. She would take a metal rake to the grasses and watch as flames spread.

“Fire was absolutely a part of what we did all the time,” she said. “It wasn’t a fearful thing.”

Long before California was California, Native Americans used fire to keep the lands where they lived healthy. That meant intentionally burning excess vegetation at regular intervals, during times of the year when the weather would keep blazes smaller and cooler than the destructive wildfires burning today.

The work requires a deep understanding of how winds would spread flames down a particular hillside or when lighting a fire in a forest would foster the growth of certain plants, and that knowledge has been passed down through ceremony and practice. But until recently, it has been mostly dismissed as unscientific.

Now, as more Americans are being forced to confront the realities of climate change, firefighting experts and policymakers are increasingly turning to fundamental ecological principles that have long guided Indigenous communities.

“I keep saying we’re getting that ‘I told you so’ award,” Ms. Brown, a member of the Kosealekte Band of the Ajumawi-Atsuge Nation in Northern California, said with a weary smile. “My prayer is that ignorance won’t stop us again.”

Today, she is the tribal partnerships director for Lomakatsi Restoration Project, a nonprofit organization that works with tribal communities in Oregon and Northern California to make life in forested areas more sustainable. That includes efforts to repair fire-adapted ecosystems, many of which, she said, have gone too long without burning.


Belinda Brown, the tribal director for the Lomakatsi Restoration Project,
 doing prescribed burn maintenance around her home.
Lomakatsi Restoration Project

Ms. Brown appeared recently in front of a Zoom background showing blue sky. In reality, she was speaking from inside an office in Modoc County, a region that was engulfed in smoke.

More than five million acres have burned on the West Coast this year, including a staggering four million in California, where four of the five largest fires ever recorded here started in August or September.

Officials and experts have coalesced around the need to abandon longstanding policies requiring that every fire be extinguished and to significantly increase the use of prescribed burning. The practice involves determining which areas are overgrown and when conditions like wind direction and air moisture are right to intentionally ignite less intense fires that can be carefully managed.

In the southeastern United States, prescribed fire is already used to treat millions of acres every year, which experts have credited with sparing communities from the kind of devastation that has become a tragic routine in California.

But it has been difficult to introduce those practices in the West, where the landscape and climate are essentially incomparable.

Dar Mims, a meteorologist for the California Air Resources Board and an expert on prescribed burning, said that perhaps the biggest challenge for the state’s policymakers has been convincing the public that burning large swaths of land on purpose is the best way to keep them safe, when they have been told for generations to fear fire of any kind.

This challenge is compounded by the fact that many have been allowed to move into areas that are at risk of burning, with the expectation that their property will be protected at any cost.

“It’s like making the battleship turn,” he said. “It takes time.” Still, officials and Indigenous community advocates have described this year as a wake-up call.


A home destroyed by the L.N.U. Lightning Complex in August. Four of the five largest fires 
recorded in California happened this year. L
an C. Bates for The New York Times


Last month, Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon, Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Maria Cantwell of Washington introduced legislation that would fund significantly more prescribed fire.

In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom has acknowledged that the state’s forests should be better maintained, even as he pushed back against President Trump’s characterizations that destructive wildfires are the result of insufficient work by state officials to keep forests cleared.

Mr. Newsom has touted a new partnership with the United States Forest Service, which controls most of the state’s forest land, with the goal of treating one million acres per year, including with prescribed fire. All of that, officials have said, will require building better coordination with tribes.

“Our commitment at the Forest Service is to work with tribal partners to achieve healthy and resilient landscapes,” Barnie Gyant, deputy regional forester for the Forest Service’s Pacific Southwest Region, said in a statement. “Native American tribes, tribal governments, traditional practitioners and their communities bring thousands of years of traditional ecological knowledge to our partnership.”

They are not starting totally from scratch.  Lomakatsi, for instance, has for years worked with the Forest Service, as well as other nonprofit groups like the Nature Conservancy, tribes and private landowners, on long-term projects aimed at restoring large areas, typically tens of thousands of acres across multiple jurisdictions.

The organization hires and trains workers, including young Native Americans, who help treat about 16,000 acres per year with a combination of fixes including prescribed fire, native grass seeding and strategic tree thinning — which can even make some money back, if the logs are sold.

Marko Bey, the organization’s executive director, said much of his job involves cobbling together millions of dollars from funding sources to pay for the projects. Recently, it has become easier to make the case that sustainability efforts are a good investment.

“Fire suppression is an open checkbook,” he said.  Still, for many Native Americans, the recognition is a kind of bittersweet validation.  Over the course of California’s long colonial history, native Californians were violently and systematically stripped of the ability to tend the land they had lived on for centuries as white settlers pursued gold, timber and territory.

This dark history unfolded while modern firefighting agencies and techniques were formed under the heavy influence of Europeans who wanted to maximize timber hauls, said Mary Huffman, director of the Indigenous Peoples Burning Network.

“We developed this real commitment to keeping fire out,” she said, “and of course that was completely backwards from what Indigenous people had done for thousands and thousands of years.”

This dark history unfolded while modern firefighting agencies and techniques were formed under the heavy influence of Europeans who wanted to maximize timber hauls, said Mary Huffman, director of the Indigenous Peoples Burning Network.

“We developed this real commitment to keeping fire out,” she said, “and of course that was completely backwards from what Indigenous people had done for thousands and thousands of years.”

Still, officials and Indigenous community advocates have described this year as a wake-up call.   Last month, Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon, Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Maria Cantwell of Washington introduced legislation that would fund significantly more prescribed fire.

In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom has acknowledged that the state’s forests should be better maintained, even as he pushed back against President Trump’s characterizations that destructive wildfires are the result of insufficient work by state officials to keep forests cleared. 

Mr. Newsom has touted a new partnership with the United States Forest Service, which controls most of the state’s forest land, with the goal of treating one million acres per year, including with prescribed fire. All of that, officials have said, will require building better coordination with tribes.

“Our commitment at the Forest Service is to work with tribal partners to achieve healthy and resilient landscapes,” Barnie Gyant, deputy regional forester for the Forest Service’s Pacific Southwest Region, said in a statement. “Native American tribes, tribal governments, traditional practitioners and their communities bring thousands of years of traditional ecological knowledge to our partnership.”  They are not starting totally from scratch.

Lomakatsi, for instance, has for years worked with the Forest Service, as well as other nonprofit groups like the Nature Conservancy, tribes and private landowners, on long-term projects aimed at restoring large areas, typically tens of thousands of acres across multiple jurisdictions.

The organization hires and trains workers, including young Native Americans, who help treat about 16,000 acres per year with a combination of fixes including prescribed fire, native grass seeding and strategic tree thinning — which can even make some money back, if the logs are sold.

Marko Bey, the organization’s executive director, said much of his job involves cobbling together millions of dollars from funding sources to pay for the projects. Recently, it has become easier to make the case that sustainability efforts are a good investment.  “Fire suppression is an open checkbook,” he said.  

Still, for many Native Americans, the recognition is a kind of bittersweet validation.  Over the course of California’s long colonial history, native Californians were violently and systematically stripped of the ability to tend the land they had lived on for centuries as white settlers pursued gold, timber and territory.

This dark history unfolded while modern firefighting agencies and techniques were formed under the heavy influence of Europeans who wanted to maximize timber hauls, said Mary Huffman, director of the Indigenous Peoples Burning Network.  “We developed this real commitment to keeping fire out,” she said, “and of course that was completely backwards from what Indigenous people had done for thousands and thousands of years.”

“We developed this real commitment to keeping fire out,” she said, “and of course that was completely backwards from what Indigenous people had done for thousands and thousands of years.”

A 1920 article written by William B. Greeley in The Timberman dismisses light burning as practiced by “the Indians in various western pine forests long before the advent of the white man” as fallacy — propaganda that, if heeded, would lead to the destruction of lucrative trees.

Bill Tripp, the director of natural resources and environmental policy for the Karuk Tribe Department of Natural Resources, wrote in a piece for The Guardian that Karuk people were shot for burning as recently as the 1930s.

The idea of prescribed burning remained polarizing for decades, as federal and state firefighting agencies were built up around the idea that wildfire was an enemy to be defeated using military-style tactics, not a tool that could help prevent destruction.



The efforts to suppress wildfires, particularly in the American West have often resembled military campaigns.
— as seen here in Oregon in 1955 —
 
J R Eyerman/The LIFE Picture Collection, via Getty Images

 

Dr. Huffman said it was important to distinguish between the heavily regulated prescribed burning purely to mitigate the risk of destructive wildfires and the cultural burning that has been practiced by Indigenous people around the world for a variety of purposes.
But the two share important commonalities: “They know exactly why they’re burning, how they’re doing it and who’s doing it,” Dr. Huffman said.

That means knowledge of specific terrain is crucial, which underscores a clear advantage Indigenous fire officials have over firefighters coming in from other states or even overseas.

[Read about how the Danny Manning, assistant fire chief for the Greenville Rancheria, who also works as a cultural specialist with the Forest Service, said he had noticed shifts over roughly the last decade in the relationship between federal and tribal fire officials.

“There used to be stubbornness on both sides and now it’s different,” he said. “The tribes out here are getting a lot more organized, too.”

Mr. Manning, whse ancestry is Mountain Maidu, Navajo and Sioux, has spent his career fighting fire in the summers and doing cultural and prescribed burning in the fall and sporing. When it is fire season, he will work for 14 days straight and then return home for a rest.

As of a few weeks ago, he said he had been out seven times this year. It’s been more intense every fire season,” he said. “Everybody’s looking at them and seeing we need to do something besides put them out.”

Gilbert Sanchez 
gilsanche01@gmail.com
 





XXX


Hispanic American Incomes 

Are Rising Faster Than Anybody Else’s

They seem to be on a path to success taken by other immigrants.

By Noah Smith , October 6, 2020

 


The U.S. has no shortage of bad news, but there are still a few bright spots to be found. One is the steady economic progress enjoyed by Hispanic Americans over the past two decades. Though much remains to be done, Hispanics are coming closer to enjoying an American dream long denied to them. 

From 2014 through 2019, as the U.S. economy expanded and incomes rose, Hispanic Americans logged faster income growth than any of the country’s other main racial groups:

Of course, that growth was from a relatively low base; the absolute size of the income gap between Whites and Hispanics shrank by only about $2,700 during the boom and still stands at almost $20,000 for median households. But rapid income growth is boosting more Hispanics into the middle class, raising living standards and creating a widespread feeling of upward mobility

Part of this surely has to do with the end of mass immigration from Latin America. Since 2007, what was once a flood of immigrants from Mexico has slowed to a trickle. Immigrants tend to make less money than their native-born children, as they lack social connections and often speak limited English. This is especially true of undocumented immigrants, who tend to have low educational attainment. And undocumented immigration has fallen far faster than other types. The end of mass migration from Mexico will thus make Hispanic average incomes rise as the upward mobility of the second generation shines through in the statistics.

But Hispanic progress isn’t just a function of averages. In 2018, economists Raj Chetty, Nathaniel Hendren, Maggie Jones and Sonya Porter evaluated the intergenerational mobility of U.S. racial groups and concluded: “Hispanic Americans are moving up significantly in the income distribution across generations … and may close most of the gap between their incomes and those of whites.”

Other reports have found similar results. In particular, economic gaps between Mexican and White Americans, which had stubbornly persisted for generations, are finally closing

Why? One reason is that Hispanic kids are also getting much more education. In 2012, Hispanic college enrollment rates surpassed those of Whites. In the year 2000, more than 30% of Hispanics dropped out of high school; by 2016 it was only 10%. Like many recent immigrant groups, Hispanics have been using education as a ladder into the middle class.

Another possible reason is geographic mobility. Hispanic immigrants have tended to cluster in the Southwest of the U.S., close to the Mexican border. But in recent years, they have increasingly diffused across the country; Chicago, for example, is now about one-third Hispanic. Research shows leaving traditional economic enclaves tends to help people move up in American society, perhaps because doing so lets people make a broader range of social connections and expand their personal horizons.

So Hispanic immigrants appear to be following the path of past U.S. immigrant groups — working hard, getting an education, moving around the country and seeing their incomes rise from generation to generation. But huge challenges remain. One obvious task is to reduce the racial discrimination many Hispanics still face. Inflammatory rhetoric such as President Donald Trump’s seems likely to exacerbate that problem.

Another challenge is building Hispanic wealth. Although income gaps between Hispanics and Whites are narrowing, wealth gaps remain substantial. As of 2016, White households in the lower and middle income groups each had about 3 times as much wealth as their Hispanic counterparts, and the gap has not been closing. Add income disparities, and the picture becomes even starker — in 2016, the median Hispanic family had a net worth of only $20,720, less than one-eighth that of Whites. 

Homeownership, the traditional vehicle of wealth-building for the U.S. middle class, has something to do with this. White American households continue to be far more likely to own their own houses:

If Hispanic incomes keep catching up, then this situation will change over time. But it will take many decades. A national program to assist first-time homebuyers, combined with a huge program of homebuilding — similar to what the WW2 generation got with the G.I. Bill and the creation of the suburbs — is the logical way for the government to help Hispanic Americans build wealth. 

But despite these challenges, Hispanic Americans have been moving up the economic ladder. Their steady climb shows the American dream, while perhaps less powerful than it used to be, is not yet dead. That’s something to celebrate.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:  Noah Smith at nsmith150@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net

 

 



XXX

The $2.6 Trillion U.S. Latino Market: 
The Largest And Fastest Growing Blindspot Of The American Economy

By: Sean Salas, Forbes – Sep 27, 2020

The $2.6 Trillion U.S. Latino Market: The Largest And Fastest Growing Blindspot Of The American Economy

By: Sean Salas, Forbes – Sep 27, 2020

The U.S. Latino market is “growing GDP at 8.6%, faster than China, faster than India, and nobody talks about it,” said Sol Trujillo, Co-Founder of L’Attitude, to a panel of world renowned journalists and economists.

Per the recently published 2020 LDC U.S. Latino GDP Report, the size of the U.S. Latino market measured by GDP was $2.6 Trillion in 2018, up almost 9% from $2.3 Trillion in 2017.  If the U.S. Latino market was its own country, it would be the 8th largest economy in the world and the largest Latino market in the world, larger than Brazil and more than twice the size of Mexico.  When compared to the non-Latino U.S. cohort, the Latino cohort grew 4.5 times faster in terms of GDP, implying most of the U.S. growth came from the Latino population.  Put another way, had it not been for strong growth in the U.S. Latino market, the U.S. economy would have likely contracted between 2017 and 2018.

Driving growth in the U.S. economy is a young and educated Latino labor force. Latino employees entering the labor force offset declines from the outgoing Baby Boomers.  Latino Donor Collaborative reports Latinos were responsible for 78% of the net new jobs in the labor force since the Great Recession. Furthermore, Latino household growth was 23.2% in 2010-18, compared to 3.8% for that of non-Latino households. Given the higher population growth of Latinos relative to non-Latino demographics, this demonstrates how important Latinos are, not only today, but also in the future growth of the economy.

Despite the size and growth of the U.S. Latino market, this segment of the economy continues to be a big blind spot for many decision-makers in C-suite positions. Most Americans in the U.S. don’t understand the potential and current contribution of the Latino market.  For instance, there is a big misconception of the narrative that involves Latinos and education, according to the President and CEO of the Hispanic Scholarship Fund, Fidel Vargas.  Mr. Vargas explains, when asked “what is the ratio between Asian Americans and Latinos that go to college?” — most Americans respond it is 3 Asian Americans for every 1 Latino in college.  The reality is it is 2.5 Latinos for every Asian American.  The real narrative showcasing the high proportion of Latinos among college educated students presents a massive investment opportunity for companies. Do you think long-term investment decisions would change if executives better understood the value inherent in the U.S. Latino market?

In between the lines of these statistics is a clear sense of resilience among Latinos.  Latinos are among the most undercapitalized and under-resourced in the U.S. For example, Latino businesses were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 and 50%+ less likely to receive government relief under the Payment Protection Program, compared to White-owned businesses, per a reportpublished by the Stanford Latino Entrepreneurship Initiative.  Latinas have been worse off than their male counterparts, comprising less than 1% of those who receive venture capital.  And yet, Latinas are the fastest growing entrepreneur demographic in the U.S.  “We know that Latinas start the most companies; but imagine what they could do if they had the support, the access, the capital and the mentorship,” says Beatriz Acevedo, CEO and Co-Founder of Suma Wealth.

L’Attitude intends to shed light to the biggest blind spot of the American economy.  L’Attitude was co-founded in 2018 by international business executive Sol Trujillo and NAHREP CEO Gary Acosta, and internationally acclaimed producer Emilio Estefan joined the partnership in 2019.  The conference convenes Fortune 100 executives, top policymakers, and industry leaders for 4 days to discuss the U.S. Latino market opportunity, referred to as The New Mainstream Economy.

By: Sean Salas, Forbes – Sep 27, 2020

 


SEPTEMBER  


Happy Hispanic Heritage Month!
 
Let’s recognize and celebrate the contributions of Hispanics in the U.S.

September 2020 Update 
Joseph Castro, new Chancellor of California State University 
Juan Sánchez Muñoz, new chancellor of the University of California, Merced. 
Milagros (Milly) Peña, new president, Purchase College, part of State University of New York.

DFW Hispanic 100 To Honor Viola Delgado & Anette Landeros
Rosa Rosales, served as the 48th LULAC National President.
Remembering
Delta Air Lines flight 15, 9/11/01




NYTimes Interview of Joseph Castro by Jill Cowan


NYTimes Interview of Joseph Castro
By Jill Cowan
Jill Cowan
September 25, 2020

Earlier this week, the California State University announced its next leader: Joseph Castro, who has served as president of Cal State Fresno since 2013.

He’ll be the eighth person to become chancellor of the nation’s largest four-year public university system, but he’ll be the first Californian and the first Mexican-American in the post. He’ll start in the new job on Jan. 4.

In addition to lauding Dr. Castro’s deep experience, many education advocates and other leaders said his perspective would reflect those of the students he serves; 43 percent identified as Hispanic or Latinx, according to data from fall 2019. That’s 207,441 people.

Almost a third of the students are the first in their families to attend college and half of undergraduates receive Pell grants, which help low-income students go to college.

“This is an awful time for everybody, but in particular for young people starting out, especially if they’re poor and first-generation,” Lillian Kimbell, who is chair of the university’s board, told me. “And I think Joe is such a champion of those students.”

Leading a system with 23 campuses across a huge, geographically and demographically diverse state during a pandemic that has upended education is a complex challenge. I talked to Dr. Castro about how he’s approaching it, and what he hopes to accomplish.

Here’s our conversation, lightly edited and condensed:
QUESTION: Tell me first about what it means to you to become chancellor of one of the nation’s biggest public education institutions.

I’m thrilled to be a chancellor of the C.S.U., especially during this consequential time.  The C.S.U. is the largest. But I think it’s the most important institution in the United States because of the students that we serve. We support students from all different backgrounds to get quality degrees in a timely way and become leaders.  And to be the first Californian to serve as chancellor is very meaningful.

QUESTION: Can you talk about your personal background and how that has shaped your work and how you relate to students?

I was born here in the San Joaquin Valley, not far from Fresno State. I’m the grandson of immigrants from Mexico. They came here about 100 years ago. My great-grandfather helped to build the railroad through the Valley. He brought my great-grandmother and my grandfather, who was about 2 years old at the time, and who helped to raise me.

My grandfather told me all the stories of growing up and how for several of his early years, they lived in tents along the railroad. And that was how my family started in Hanford.

I’m the son of a single mother, a beautician, and they all cared about education — my mother and my grandparents — even though they hadn’t gone to college. I had the opportunity to go to U.C. Berkeley, and that changed my entire life. And for me, that is why I’m in higher education and why I’m serving today.
I feel like I need to pay that gift forward.

QUESTION: Can you talk about your personal background and how that has shaped your work and how you relate to students?

I was born here in the San Joaquin Valley, not far from Fresno State. I’m the grandson of immigrants from Mexico. They came here about 100 years ago. My great-grandfather helped to build the railroad through the Valley. He brought my great-grandmother and my grandfather, who was about 2 years old at the time, and who helped to raise me.

My grandfather told me all the stories of growing up and how for several of his early years, they lived in tents along the railroad. And that was how my family started in Hanford.

I’m the son of a single mother, a beautician, and they all cared about education — my mother and my grandparents — even though they hadn’t gone to college. I had the opportunity to go to U.C. Berkeley, and that changed my entire life. And for me, that is why I’m in higher education and why I’m serving today.
I feel like I need to pay that gift forward.

QUESTION:  What are some of your top priorities?
I’ve worked closely with Chancellor White on Graduation Initiative 2025. It outlines ambitious goals to increase graduation rates and eliminate achievement gaps between groups. So that will continue as forcefully as possible.
Then there’s the health and safety of our communities, especially during the pandemic.

And then I’ve already begun conversations with legislative leaders and the governor about funding for the C.S.U. I want to inspire them to invest as much as possible and to begin to increase the budget over time, then to look for ways to identify new resources from private individuals and businesses through partnerships and foundations, and so forth.

Then I’d also like to inspire the use of technology in the smartest way, most strategic way possible. That would be driven by our students and faculty and staff.

QUESTION: I know the C.S.U. board endorsed Proposition 16, which would repeal the state’s ban on affirmative action. Do you share that view?

I support Proposition 16. I believe that it would be good for the C.S.U. and for California because it will expand opportunities for students, especially from underrepresented backgrounds, and especially now, as we’re talking about racial justice. Black lives matter.

The university plays such an important role in preparing a new generation of leaders who understand that and support that, from all different backgrounds. And that helps make better policy decisions. I think it makes for a more cohesive society as well — more vibrant.

[What to know about the statewide propositions on your ballot.]

The C.S.U. was pretty far out front in deciding to move almost all classes online for the fall semester, and then for spring. Covid seems like it’ll continue to be a huge undertaking for all kinds of institutions. What decisions are you weighing going forward?

I think that our system has made really good decisions based on health expert advice. We have acted early and decisively, and I think that’s helped here. Fresno State: our enrollment is up 6 percent. We have the largest enrollment in our history during Covid. 

So I think that planning, for families, is a chance to do what they need to lean into education for the spring. I anticipate based on the conversations I’ve had with the chancellor and the other presidents, that it will look pretty similar to what we’re doing in the fall.

Some campuses, like ours, will have some in-person courses. We have baseline testing and now monthly testing. We use an app for folks to determine if they’re healthy enough to come to campus. We’ll do temperature checking. We use P.P.E. and we have relatively few students in the residential halls.

Those have all been good decisions for Fresno and each campus is having to make those kinds of judgments. We’ve learned a lot and I think we’re getting smarter about these things.

You mentioned technology earlier. Do you envision many of these changes staying in place even after the pandemic?

Yeah, there is a tremendous amount of innovation occurring right now at each campus, and it’s happening under stressful circumstances.  Once we remove the stress of the pandemic, I actually believe we’re going to be in a new place where we’re offering more courses virtually because students will want that and faculty will want to teach the courses that way.  So I don’t see us going backward to where we were in March. I see us going forward to a new place — an exciting place
.

In addition:

  • Juan Sánchez Muñoz, president of the University of Houston Downtown, in Texas, has been appointed chancellor of the University of California, Merced.
  • Milagros (Milly) Peña, dean of the College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences at the University of California, Riverside, has been selected as president of Purchase College, part of the State University of New York.

Gilbert Sanchez gilsanche01@gmail.com

 



XXX


Juan Sánchez Muñoz named chancellor of UC Merced
May 20, 2020
Chris de Hoyos

 

The Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities applauds the Board of Regents of The University of California for appointing Juan Sánchez Muñoz, Ph.D., to serve as the chancellor for UC Merced, effective July 2020.

Muñoz, a UC alum, becomes the fourth chancellor to hold the position at UC Merced and replaces Nathan Brostrom who was appointed as the interim chancellor as of Aug. 15, 2019, succeeding Chancellor Dorothy Leland, who stepped down from the position.

Muñoz is the president of University of Houston-Downtown, a HACU-member institution. He has served as president of UHD since 2017.

Prior to UHD, Muñoz served as the senior vice president for institutional diversity, equity and community engagement and vice provost for undergraduate education and student affairs at Texas Tech University.

Muñoz has an extensive background in higher education. He has served as a member of HACU’s Governing Board since October 2018.

“HACU commends the UC Board of Regents for taking a first step in remedying the dearth of Latino representation in leadership positions across the UC campuses,” said HACU President and CEO Antonio R. Flores. "Dr. Juan Sánchez Muñoz is a proven leader whose exemplary service as a HACU board member demonstrates his commitment to the mission of Championing Hispanic Success in Higher Education. We congratulate him on being selected to serve as the next chancellor of UC Merced."

Muñoz returns to California where he previously was a secondary school teacher, a community college adviser, instructor, and an assistant professor at California State University, Fullerton in the department of secondary education.

He earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology from UC Santa Barbara and a Master of Arts in Mexican American studies from California State University, Los Angeles and a doctorate in curriculum and instruction in the Division of Urban Schooling from UCLA.

Sent by Gilbert Sanchez

 



XXX


Milagros “Milly” Peña 
SUNY appoints Purchase College’s first Hispanic president

May 29, 2020

 

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Trustees of the nation’s largest university system on Friday appointed the first Hispanic, female president to lead one of its top-rated colleges.

The State University of New York Board of Trustees voted unanimously to name Milagros “Milly” Peña as the new president of Purchase College after a nationwide search.

Peña is currently a dean at the College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at the University of California, Riverside and a sociologist. She was also the first in her family to attend college and receive a high school diploma.

“I was drawn to Purchase for its distinctive strength in the liberal arts and the arts and the diverse and inclusive community that values individuality and fully embraces the motto ‘think wide open,’” Peña said in a release Friday.

Her appointment makes her the sixth president of Purchase College and the first of Hispanic heritage. Peña grew up in Manhattan as the daughter of Dominican immigrants.

“One our highest priorities is to equip our campuses with strong, proven leaders, with exemplary track records who possess the deepest commitment to education necessary to deliver the world-class education our students deserve and expect,” said SUNY Chairman Merryl H. Tisch.

 

https://apnews.com/article/02c977ed84dd68aef7639f120de0fa80 

 



XXX


DFW Hispanic 100 To Honor 
Viola Delgado & Anette Landeros

Awardees to receive Latina Living Legend & Emerging Latina Leader Awards

DALLAS, TX, Oct.1, 2020 -- The DFW Hispanic 100, a network of Dallas/Ft. Worth area Hispanic women leaders working to increase business and leadership opportunities for Latinas, will honor Viola Delgado with its 2020 Latina Living Legend (LLL) Award and Anette Landeros with its Emerging Latina Leader Award (ELLA).  

The LLL award recognizes the lifetime commitment of a DFW area Latina who has distinguished herself through her profession, active community and civic participation, volunteerism, and/or philanthropic endeavors.

 "Viola has dedicated a lifetime to expressing and sharing the vibrant legacy of the Hispanic community through her art," said Linda Valdez-Thompson, President of the DFW Hispanic 100. "Through her public art, her curatorial work and her own exhibits, Delgado has addressed the need in the community for more voices to tell the story of women of color."

 Viola Delgado is not only a gifted artist, she is also well known as a tireless community activist and philanthropist. Throughout her career, she has donated works for silent auctions, fundraisers and public facilities well over of $100,000. She has donated to such institutions and organizations as African American Museum, Latino Culture Center, Cara Mia, Junior Player, Big Thought, Truitt Elementary Mural, Dallas Public Library Central Branch, Guadalupe Catholic Church, Good Shepard Catholic Church, City of Dallas City Hall, Dallas Challenge, SAFIR, Old Settle Recreation Center (McKinney, Texas), Texas A&M in Kingsville, Texas, Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure (Dallas Hispanics for the Cure), La Pena El Corazon Exhibit Fundraisers (Austin, Texas), Dallas Children's Hospital, Erin Kelso Liver Transplant Foundation, North Texas Food Bank, Amnesty International. These donations have helped raise thousands of dollars for causes that promote multiculturalism and several important community initiatives for equity and access to services.

 She has served on the Public Art Committee, La Reunion Advisory Committee, ARTE, and several other art-related organizations. Delgado has also guided and mentored generations of young and emerging artists through her work in different organizations and local schools.

 Viola's research into the culture and history of a project have made her a sought-after artist for several public and commercial projects in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. Her murals can be found at the Latino Cultural Center, Dallas; Stevens Park and Tolbert Elementary Schools, Dallas; the Dallas West Library Courtyard and Vickery Village/Buckner Baptist Children's Home, Dallas. Some of her extraordinary medallions are in the International Terminal D at the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport and the Lake June and Rowlett Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Stations. The Dallas Observer named her DFW International Airport medallion as one of 10 points of interest. She has also curated exhibits at the Latino Cultural Center for six years.  

The ELLA award recognizes a Latina professional making an impact on women and girls through her engagement and leadership in her community and profession.  

"Anette deeply believes in mentorship and aims to pass onto the new generations the empowerment of knowing how to navigate opportunities for personal and professional growth," added Valdez-Thompson. "She aims to create the personal and professional networks to help others thrive both in her corporate role and in her community efforts. Her volunteer efforts are centered on her passion of leveling the professional playing field for women and communities of color."

 As the President and CEO of the Fort Worth Hispanic Chamber of Commerce (FWHCC), Anette Landeros is dedicated to providing valuable programming to businesses, championing the importance of workforce development, and creating opportunities for the economic mobility for all chamber members. Since being recently named to this role in July of 2019, Anette has been working diligently to strengthen the chamber's partnerships and community outreach. Anette is currently leading the Chamber in their Fort Worth Forward 2020 Strategic Plan and the recently launched Business BounceBack B3 initiative to assist businesses that have been negatively impacted by COVID-19. Previously, Anette led teams of federal auditors in evaluating program performance and regulatory compliance for the Office of Inspector General at the United States Department of Transportation. Anette has worked on award-winning reports that have broadly impacted the transportation industry. Additionally, Anette Soto Landeros is currently the Immediate Past State Chair of the Hispanic Women's Network of Texas, an organization committed to the advancement of women in public, corporate, and civic arenas. Anette remains the youngest person elected to lead the organization's state-wide mission and provided direction for chapters located in 8 different cities throughout Texas.  

Anette is a recognized change-agent and energetic leader that has spent nearly a decade committed to the growth and success of Latinas within the Latino community and the Hispanic Women's Network of Texas specifically. She has cultivated a valuable network of corporate and community relationships by modeling a strong sense of integrity and demonstrating a tremendous work ethic.  

Delgado's and Landeros' contributions to Dallas area Latinos will be recognized during a virtual event on October 1st, 2020. The proceeds benefit the H100 and its Latina Giving Circle.

 Past honorees of the Latina Living Legend award have included some of the most prominent Latina leaders in North Texas such as the honorable Anita N. Martinez, Gloria Campos, Adelfa B. Callejo, Dr. Gloria Contreras, Dolores Gomez Barzune, Dr. Catalina Garcia, Sheriff Lupe Valdez, Dr. Michele Bobadilla, Bea Salazar, Mercedes Olivera who was honored posthumously, and Lupita Colmenero.

 To register visit: https://www.dfwhispanic100.org/

 About The Hispanic 100

The Hispanic 100 is a network of Dallas-area Hispanic women leaders who are committed to increasing business development opportunities for Hispanic, women-owned businesses and to promoting Hispanic women's leadership roles in the private and public sectors. The organization's endowment fund supports Latina educational and social initiatives. For more information and sponsorship opportunities, visit www.dfwhispanic100.org.  

Contact: Maryanne Piña-Frodsham  
maryannep@careermp.com
 
817.791.0755 

SOURCE Hispanic 100
Sent by Latina Style, Inc. 
www.latinastyle.com 





XXX

Happy Hispanic Heritage Month! 
Let’s recognize and celebrate the contributions of Hispanics in the U.S.


This week, we would like to introduce and highlight the story of a very passionate LULAC advocate, Rosa Rosales, who served as the 48th LULAC National President.



As a member, Rosa has been involved with the organization for over three decades. She has served in many roles, including most recently, National Vice President for the Southwest. 

She was re-elected to a record-breaking fourth term, she served for four years as LULAC Texas State Director, and she was the first woman district director for District 15--the largest district in the nation.



Rosales has nurtured her children and family in LULAC, and we are excited to share some of their stories too! Listen to her sons, Rodolfo Rosales and Gabriel Y. Rosales, and her grandaughter, Bianca Rosales at our Hispanic Heritage Month celebration site: LULAC.org/heritage

Listen to her  tell their stories: 

https://lulac.org/heritage/stories/?utm_content=Link+208945&utm_campaign=Programs&utm_source=Do
+you+know+about+Rosa+Rosales%3F&utm_medium=Email
 

 



XXX

DELTA AIR LINES FLIGHT 15, 9/11/01


This incredible story is from a flight attendant on Delta Flight 15:

On the morning of Tuesday, September 11, we were about 5 hours out of Frankfurt, flying over the North Atlantic.

All of a sudden the curtains parted and I was told to go to the cockpit, immediately, to see the captain.
As soon as I got there I noticed that the crew had that “All Business” look on their faces. The captain handed me a printed message. It was from Delta’s main office in Atlanta and simply read, “All airways over the Continental United States are closed to commercial air traffic. Land ASAP at the nearest airport. Advise your destination.”

No one said a word about what this could mean. We knew it was a serious situation and we needed to find terra firma quickly. The captain determined that the nearest airport was 400 miles behind us in Gander, Newfoundland.

He requested approval for a route change from the Canadian traffic controller and approval was granted immediately — no questions asked. We found out later, of course, why there was no hesitation in approving our request.
While the flight crew prepared the airplane for landing, another message arrived from Atlanta telling us about some terrorist activity in the New York area. A few minutes later word came in about the hijackings.
We decided to LIE to the passengers while we were still in the air. We told them the plane had a simple instrument problem and that we needed to land at the nearest airport in Gander, Newfoundland, to have it checked out.

We promised to give more information after landing in Gander. There was much grumbling among the passengers, but that’s nothing new! Forty minutes later, we landed in Gander. Local time at Gander was 12:30 PM …. that’s 11:00 AM EST.

There were already about 20 other airplanes on the ground from all over the world that had taken this detour on their way to the US.
After we parked on the ramp, the captain made the following announcement: “Ladies and gentlemen, you must be wondering if all these airplanes around us have the same instrument problem as we have. The reality is that we are here for another reason.”

Then he went on to explain the little bit we knew about the situation in the US. There were loud gasps and stares of disbelief. The captain informed passengers that Ground control in Gander told us to stay put.
The Canadian Government was in charge of our situation and no one was allowed to get off the aircraft. No one on the ground was allowed to come near any of the air crafts. Only airport police would come around periodically, look us over and go on to the next airplane.

In the next hour or so more planes landed and Gander ended up with 53 airplanes from all over the world, 27 of which were US commercial jets.
Meanwhile, bits of news started to come in over the aircraft radio and for the first time we learned that airplanes were flown into the World Trade Center in New York and into the Pentagon in DC.

People were trying to use their cell phones, but were unable to connect due to a different cell system in Canada . Some did get through, but were only able to get to the Canadian operator who would tell them that the lines to the U.S. were either blocked or jammed.

Sometime in the evening the news filtered to us that the World Trade Center buildings had collapsed and that a fourth hijacking had resulted in a crash. By now the passengers were emotionally and physically exhausted, not to mention frightened, but everyone stayed amazingly calm.

We had only to look out the window at the 52 other stranded aircraft to realize that we were not the only ones in this predicament.
We had been told earlier that they would be allowing people off the planes one plane at a time. At 6 PM, Gander airport told us that our turn to deplane would be 11 am the next morning.  
Passengers were not happy, but they simply resigned themselves to this news without much noise and started to prepare themselves to spend the night on the airplane.

Gander had promised us medical attention, if needed, water, and lavatory servicing.
And they were true to their word.

Fortunately we had no medical situations to worry about. We did have a young lady who was 33 weeks into her pregnancy. We took REALLY good care of her. The night passed without incident despite the uncomfortable sleeping arrangements.
About 10:30 on the morning of the 12th a convoy of school buses showed up. We got off the plane and were taken to the terminal where we went through Immigration and Customs and then had to register with the Red Cross.
After that we (the crew) were separated from the passengers and were taken in vans to a small hotel.
We had no idea where our passengers were going. We learned from the Red Cross that the town of Gander has a population of 10,400 people and they had about 10,500 passengers to take care of from all the airplanes that were forced into Gander!
We were told to just relax at the hotel and we would be contacted when the US airports opened again, but not to expect that call for a while.
We found out the total scope of the terror back home only after getting to our hotel and turning on the TV, 24 hours after it all started.

Meanwhile, we had lots of time on our hands and found that the people of Gander were extremely friendly. They started calling us the “plane people.” We enjoyed their hospitality, explored the town of Gander and ended up having a pretty good time.
Two days later, we got that call and were taken back to the Gander airport. Back on the plane, we were reunited with the passengers and found out what they had been doing for the past two days.
What we found out was incredible…..

Gander and all the surrounding communities (within about a 75 Kilometer radius) had closed all high schools, meeting halls, lodges, and any other large gathering places. They converted all these facilities to mass lodging areas for all the stranded travelers.
Some had cots set up, some had mats with sleeping bags and pillows set up.
ALL the high school students were required to volunteer their time to take care of the “guests.”
Our 218 passengers ended up in a town called Lewisporte, about 45 kilometers from Gander where they were put up in a high school. If any women wanted to be in a women-only facility, that was arranged.
Families were kept together. All the elderly passengers were taken to private homes.

Remember that young pregnant lady? She was put up in a private home right across the street from a 24-hour Urgent Care facility. There was a dentist on call and both male and female nurses remained with the crowd for the duration.
Phone calls and e-mails to the U.S. and around the world were available to everyone once a day.
During the day, passengers were offered “Excursion” trips.
Some people went on boat cruises of the lakes and harbors. Some went for hikes in the local forests.
Local bakeries stayed open to make fresh bread for the guests.
Food was prepared by all the residents and brought to the schools. People were driven to restaurants of their choice and offered wonderful meals. Everyone was given tokens for local laundry mats to wash their clothes, since luggage was still on the aircraft.

In other words, every single need was met for those stranded travelers.
  Passengers were crying while telling us these stories. Finally, when they were told that U.S. airports had reopened, they were delivered to the airport right on time and without a single passenger missing or late. The local Red Cross had all the information about the whereabouts of each and every passenger and knew which plane they needed to be on and when all the planes were leaving. They coordinated everything beautifully.
It was absolutely incredible.

When passengers came on board, it was like they had been on a cruise. Everyone knew each other by name. They were swapping stories of their stay, impressing each other with who had the better time.
Our flight back to Atlanta looked like a chartered party flight. The crew just stayed out of their way. It was mind-boggling.  Passengers had totally bonded and were calling each other by their first names, exchanging phone numbers, addresses, and email addresses.
And then a very unusual thing happened.

One of our passengers approached me and asked if he could make an announcement over the PA system. We never, ever allow that. But this time was different. I said “of course” and handed him the mike. He picked up the PA and reminded everyone about what they had just gone through in the last few days.
  He reminded them of the hospitality they had received at the hands of total strangers.
  He continued by saying that he would like to do something in return for the good folks of Lewisporte.
“He said he was going to set up a Trust Fund under the name of DELTA 15 (our flight number). The purpose of the trust fund is to provide college scholarships for the high school students of Lewisporte.

He asked for donations of any amount from his fellow travelers. When the paper with donations got back to us with the amounts, names, phone numbers and addresses, the total was for more than $14,000!
“The gentleman, a MD from Virginia , promised to match the donations and to start the administrative work on the scholarship. He also said that he would forward this proposal to Delta Corporate and ask them to donate as well.

As I write this account, the trust fund is at more than $1.5 million and has assisted 134 students in college education.
“I just wanted to share this story because we need good stories right now. [This gives the writer] a little bit of hope to know that some people in a faraway place were kind to some strangers who literally dropped in on them.
It reminds me how much good there is in the world.”
“In spite of all the rotten things we see going on in today’s world this story confirms that there are still a lot of good people in the world and when things get bad, they will come forward. Let’s not forget THIS fact.

Sent by Jan Mallet who writes: This is one of those stories that need to be shared. Please do so…  janmallet2@gmail.com 


AUGUST 


M
The 1619 Project
Hillsdale College: The Great American Story: A Land of Hope
Hillsdale College: The Second World Wars, DVD Box Set

VERSUS 

 

 HILLSDALE COLLEGE   
Free Online course

"The Great American Story: 
A Land of Hope"


         Following extracts from Wikipedia 

  >  "The 1619 Project is an ongoing project developed by The New York Times Magazine in 2019 with the goal of re-examining the legacy of slavery in the United States and timed for the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first Africans in Virginia. It is an interactive project by Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for The New York Times, with contributions by the paper's writers, including essays on the history of different aspects of contemporary American life which the authors believe have "roots in slavery and its aftermath."[1] It also includes poems, short fiction, and a photo essay.[2] Originally conceived of as a special issue for August 20, 2019, it was soon turned into a full-fledged project, including a special broadsheet section in the newspaper, live events, and a multi-episode podcast series.[3]"

  >  "The project was envisioned with the condition that almost all of the contributions would be from African-American contributors, deeming the perspective of black writers an essential element of the story to be told.[17]"

  >  "When twelve Civil War historians and political scientists who research the Civil War composed a letter to The New York Times Magazine expressing their concerns about the project's "limited historical view" and "problematic treatment of major issues and personalities", New York Times Magazine editor in chief Jake Silverstein responded, but the magazine declined to publish either the original letter or the response. 

The scholars, led by Allen C. Guelzo of Princeton University, subsequently published the exchange in another venue.[37]"

  >  "On March 11, 2020, Silverstein authored an "update" in the form of a "clarification" on The New York Times' website, correcting part of Hannah-Jones's essay to state that "protecting slavery was a primary motivation for some of the colonists", when the original version had stated it was "one primary reason the colonists fought the American Revolution".[38] 

Historian Gordon Wood wrote a reply to Silverstein which the New York Times did not publish. In his reply, he stated, "I have spent my career studying the American Revolution and cannot accept the view that 'one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.'

I don’t know of any colonist who said that they wanted independence [from the British] in order to preserve their slaves."[39]"


Dear Fellow American,  Too many young Americans do not learn what makes America an exceptional nation and a beacon of liberty for the world. Too many young Americans are taught that our nation’s past holds no positive lessons which we can apply moving forward. So, is it any wonder that so many younger Americans today feel an increasing attraction to socialism and other ideas destructive of liberty?

Hillsdale College has been engaging On the battlefield of education from the beginning. Earlier this year, we produced a free online course entitled, “The Great American Story: A Land of Hope.” And I’m asking for your help in promoting it to millions of Americans—especially younger Americans—and to expand our other critical outreach efforts on behalf of liberty nationwide.

Taught by historian Wilfred McClay and based on his recently published history of America, “The Great American Story: A Land of Hope” presents a full, unbiased account of America’s past. Hillsdale’s goal in producing and promoting it is to restore the kind of intelligent patriotism—especially among our young people—that is essential to preserving free government.

This is the surest means of preserving liberty. And, this is why Hillsdale makes every online course available free of charge to any citizen wishing to learn.

“The Great American Story: A Land of Hope” is a powerful counterweight to The New York Times’ “1619 Project,” which is injecting the idea that America is an essentially unjust nation into the curricula of America’s K-12 schools.

Of course, producing a new online course and making it available free of charge requires significant resources—and promoting the course nationwide, which is essential, costs even more. But your support is critical to our success.

As you know, Hillsdale College refuses to accept one penny of government funding—not even indirectly in the form of federal or state student loans and grants. That’s why Hillsdale can remain true to its mission on behalf of liberty, free of so many bureaucratic regulations that burden other colleges and universities.

This independence also means that all of Hillsdale’s work—especially its national outreach efforts on behalf of liberty, which includes free online courses—is entirely dependent on the support of private citizens, like you, who understand the importance of education to liberty.

We deeply appreciate your partnership in promoting the kind of intelligent patriotism—especially among younger Americans— essential to preserving free government. 

Warm regards, Larry P. Arnn, President, Hillsdale College
https://secured.hillsdale.edu/hillsdale/support-great-american-story
      Pursuing Truth—Defending Liberty Since 1844


                            
                    ALSO PRODUCED by Hillsdale College: The Second World Wars, DVD Box Set

Throughout our nation’s history, brave men and women have fought to secure and preserve American liberty. It is an incredible history. One that we must understand and pass on to the next generation of Americans.

One of the best ways to do that is with Hillsdale’s online course, “The Second World Wars,” now available in a DVD box set for viewing at home or in a small group, with a gift of $100 or more. You might also find it useful for a homeschool curriculum. Do you know someone who is unfamiliar with American history or who wants to know more? This DVD makes a perfect gift!

In “The Second World Wars” DVD set, you’ll receive an expert analysis from Hillsdale College President Larry P. Arnn and renowned military historian Victor Davis Hanson. The course covers the two competing views of human nature that drove this conflict; it reveals the strategies employed by the Allies to gain supremacy in the air, at sea, and on land; and, it explains the impact and legacy of World War II. The “Second World Wars” DVD box set helps Americans understand the triumphs and tragedies that defined the greatest armed conflict in human history.

For a tax-deductible gift of $100 or more, you will receive your very own copy of the DVD box set. Not only that, your gift will help produce and promote new free Hillsdale courses similar to “The Second World Wars.” And it will help Hillsdale College expand its educational efforts to teach millions of Americans about the principles of liberty through educational outreach to millions through Imprimis, classical charter schools, digital media, and of course, online courses.

Hillsdale College
http://www.hillsdale.edu
donorservices@hillsdale.edu
(517) 437-7341
33 E. College St. Hills

 


JULY 

M

M


Read President Trump’s Pro-America Independence Day Speech From Mount Rushmore

July 3, 2020

 

The following story is brought to you courtesy of The Federalist. Click the link to visit their page and see more stories.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you very much. And Gov. Noem, Secretary Bernhardt — very much appreciate it — members of Congress, distinguished guests, and a very special hello to South Dakota. (Applause.)

As we begin this Fourth of July weekend, the first lady and I wish each and every one of you a very, very Happy Independence Day. Thank you. (Applause.)

Let us show our appreciation to the South Dakota Army and Air National Guard, and the U.S. Air Force for inspiring us with that magnificent display of American air power — (applause) — and of course, our gratitude, as always, to the legendary and very talented Blue Angels. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

Let us also send our deepest thanks to our wonderful veterans, law enforcement, first responders, and the doctors, nurses, and scientists working tirelessly to kill the virus. They’re working hard. (Applause.) I want to thank them very, very much.

We’re grateful as well to your state’s congressional delegation: Sens. John Thune — John, thank you very much — (applause) — Sen. Mike Rounds — (applause) — thank you, Mike — and Dusty Johnson, congressman. Hi, Dusty. Thank you. (Applause.) And all others with us tonight from Congress, thank you very much for coming. We appreciate it.

There could be no better place to celebrate America’s independence than beneath this magnificent, incredible, majestic mountain and monument to the greatest Americans who have ever lived.

Today, we pay tribute to the exceptional lives and extraordinary legacies of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt. (Applause.) I am here as your president to proclaim before the country and before the world: This monument will never be desecrated — (applause) — these heroes will never be defaced, their legacy will never, ever be destroyed, their achievements will never be forgotten, and Mount Rushmore will stand forever as an eternal tribute to our forefathers and to our freedom. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA!

THE PRESIDENT: We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4, 1776. At those words, every American heart should swell with pride. Every American family should cheer with delight. And every American patriot should be filled with joy, because each of you lives in the most magnificent country in the history of the world, and it will soon be greater than ever before. (Applause.)

Our Founders launched not only a revolution in government, but a revolution in the pursuit of justice, equality, liberty, and prosperity. No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America. And no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. (Applause.)

It was all made possible by the courage of 56 patriots who gathered in Philadelphia 244 years ago and signed the Declaration of Independence. (Applause.) They enshrined a divine truth that changed the world forever when they said: “All men are created equal.”

These immortal words set in motion the unstoppable march of freedom. Our Founders boldly declared that we are all endowed with the same divine rights — given [to] us by our Creator in Heaven. And that which God has given us, we will allow no one, ever, to take away — ever. (Applause.)

Seventeen seventy-six represented the culmination of thousands of years of Western civilization and the triumph not only of spirit, but of wisdom, philosophy, and reason.

And yet, as we meet here tonight, there is a growing danger that threatens every blessing our ancestors fought so hard for, struggled, they bled to secure.

Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children.

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our Founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities. Many of these people have no idea why they are doing this, but some know exactly what they are doing. They think the American people are weak and soft and submissive. But no, the American people are strong and proud, and they will not allow our country, and all of its values, history, and culture, to be taken from them. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA!

THE PRESIDENT: One of their political weapons is “cancel culture” — driving people from their jobs, shaming dissenters, and demanding total submission from anyone who disagrees. This is the very definition of totalitarianism, and it is completely alien to our culture and our values, and it has absolutely no place in the United States of America. (Applause.) This attack on our liberty, our magnificent liberty, must be stopped, and it will be stopped very quickly. We will expose this dangerous movement, protect our nation’s children, end this radical assault, and preserve our beloved American way of life. (Applause.)

In our schools, our newsrooms, even our corporate boardrooms, there is a new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance. If you do not speak its language, perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow its commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted, and punished. It’s not going to happen to us. (Applause.)

Make no mistake: this left-wing cultural revolution is designed to overthrow the American Revolution. In so doing, they would destroy the very civilization that rescued billions from poverty, disease, violence, and hunger, and that lifted humanity to new heights of achievement, discovery, and progress.

To make this possible, they are determined to tear down every statue, symbol, and memory of our national heritage.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Not on my watch! (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: True. That’s very true, actually. (Laughter.) That is why I am deploying federal law enforcement to protect our monuments, arrest the rioters, and prosecute offenders to the fullest extent of the law. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: I am pleased to report that yesterday, federal agents arrested the suspected ringleader of the attack on the statue of Andrew Jackson in Washington, D.C. — (applause) — and, in addition, hundreds more have been arrested. (Applause.)

Under the executive order I signed last week — pertaining to the Veterans’ Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act and other laws — people who damage or deface federal statues or monuments will get a minimum of 10 years in prison. (Applause.) And obviously, that includes our beautiful Mount Rushmore. (Applause.)

Our people have a great memory. They will never forget the destruction of statues and monuments to George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, abolitionists, and many others.

The violent mayhem we have seen in the streets of cities that are run by liberal Democrats, in every case, is the predictable result of years of extreme indoctrination and bias in education, journalism, and other cultural institutions.

Against every law of society and nature, our children are taught in school to hate their own country, and to believe that the men and women who built it were not heroes, but that were villains. The radical view of American history is a web of lies — all perspective is removed, every virtue is obscured, every motive is twisted, every fact is distorted, and every flaw is magnified until the history is purged and the record is disfigured beyond all recognition.

This movement is openly attacking the legacies of every person on Mount Rushmore. They defile the memory of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, and Roosevelt. Today, we will set history and history’s record straight. (Applause.)

Before these figures were immortalized in stone, they were American giants in full flesh and blood, gallant men whose intrepid deeds unleashed the greatest leap of human advancement the world has ever known. Tonight, I will tell you and, most importantly, the youth of our nation, the true stories of these great, great men.

From head to toe, George Washington represented the strength, grace, and dignity of the American people. From a small volunteer force of citizen farmers, he created the Continental Army out of nothing and rallied them to stand against the most powerful military on Earth.

Through eight long years, through the brutal winter at Valley Forge, through setback after setback on the field of battle, he led those patriots to ultimate triumph. When the Army had dwindled to a few thousand men at Christmas of 1776, when defeat seemed absolutely certain, he took what remained of his forces on a daring nighttime crossing of the Delaware River.

They marched through nine miles of frigid darkness, many without boots on their feet, leaving a trail of blood in the snow. In the morning, they seized victory at Trenton. After forcing the surrender of the most powerful empire on the planet at Yorktown, Gen. Washington did not claim power, but simply returned to Mount Vernon as a private citizen.

When called upon again, he presided over the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, and was unanimously elected our first president. (Applause.) When he stepped down after two terms, his former adversary King George called him “the greatest man of the age.” He remains first in our hearts to this day. For as long as Americans love this land, we will honor and cherish the father of our country, George Washington. (Applause.) He will never be removed, abolished, and most of all, he will never be forgotten. (Applause.)

Thomas Jefferson — the great Thomas Jefferson — was 33 years old when he traveled north to Pennsylvania and brilliantly authored one of the greatest treasures of human history, the Declaration of Independence. He also drafted Virginia’s Constitution, and conceived and wrote the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, a model for our cherished First Amendment.

After serving as the first secretary of state, and then vice president, he was elected to the presidency. He ordered American warriors to crush the Barbary pirates, he doubled the size of our nation with the Louisiana Purchase, and he sent the famous explorers Lewis and Clark into the west on a daring expedition to the Pacific Ocean.

He was an architect, an inventor, a diplomat, a scholar, the founder of one of the world’s great universities, and an ardent defender of liberty. Americans will forever admire the author of American freedom, Thomas Jefferson. (Applause.) And he, too, will never, ever be abandoned by us. (Applause.)

Abraham Lincoln, the savior of our union, was a self-taught country lawyer who grew up in a log cabin on the American frontier.

The first Republican president, he rose to high office from obscurity, based on a force and clarity of his anti-slavery convictions. Very, very strong convictions.

He signed the law that built the Transcontinental Railroad; he signed the Homestead Act, given to some incredible scholars — as simply defined, ordinary citizens free land to settle anywhere in the American West; and he led the country through the darkest hours of American history, giving every ounce of strength that he had to ensure that government of the people, by the people, and for the people did not perish from this Earth. (Applause.)

He served as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces during our bloodiest war, the struggle that saved our union and extinguished the evil of slavery. Over 600,000 died in that war; more than 20,000 were killed or wounded in a single day at Antietam. At Gettysburg, 157 years ago, the Union bravely withstood an assault of nearly 15,000 men and threw back Pickett’s charge.

Lincoln won the Civil War; he issued the Emancipation Proclamation; he led the passage of the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery for all time — (applause) — and ultimately, his determination to preserve our nation and our union cost him his life. For as long as we live, Americans will uphold and revere the immortal memory of President Abraham Lincoln. (Applause.)

Theodore Roosevelt exemplified the unbridled confidence of our national culture and identity. He saw the towering grandeur of America’s mission in the world and he pursued it with overwhelming energy and zeal.

As a lieutenant colonel during the Spanish-American War, he led the famous Rough Riders to defeat the enemy at San Juan Hill. He cleaned up corruption as police commissioner of New York City, then served as the governor of New York, vice president, and at 42 years old, became the youngest-ever president of the United States. (Applause.)

He sent our great new naval fleet around the globe to announce America’s arrival as a world power. He gave us many of our national parks, including the Grand Canyon; he oversaw the construction of the awe-inspiring Panama Canal; and he is the only person ever awarded both the Nobel Peace Prize and the Congressional Medal of Honor. He was — (applause) — American freedom personified in full. The American people will never relinquish the bold, beautiful, and untamed spirit of Theodore Roosevelt. (Applause.)

No movement that seeks to dismantle these treasured American legacies can possibly have a love of America at its heart. Can’t have it. No person who remains quiet at the destruction of this resplendent heritage can possibly lead us to a better future.

The radical ideology attacking our country advances under the banner of social justice. But in truth, it would demolish both justice and society. It would transform justice into an instrument of division and vengeance, and it would turn our free and inclusive society into a place of repression, domination, and exclusion.

They want to silence us, but we will not be silenced. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA!

AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you!

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.

We will state the truth in full, without apology: We declare that the United States of America is the most just and exceptional nation ever to exist on Earth.

We are proud of the fact — (applause) — that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and we understand — (applause) — that these values have dramatically advanced the cause of peace and justice throughout the world.

We know that the American family is the bedrock of American life. (Applause.)

We recognize the solemn right and moral duty of every nation to secure its borders. (Applause.) And we are building the wall. (Applause.)

We remember that governments exist to protect the safety and happiness of their own people. A nation must care for its own citizens first. We must take care of America first. It’s time. (Applause.)

We believe in equal opportunity, equal justice, and equal treatment for citizens of every race, background, religion, and creed. Every child, of every color — born and unborn — is made in the holy image of God. (Applause.)

We want free and open debate, not speech codes and cancel culture.

We embrace tolerance, not prejudice.

We support the courageous men and women of law enforcement. (Applause.) We will never abolish our police or our great Second Amendment, which gives us the right to keep and bear arms. (Applause.)

We believe that our children should be taught to love their country, honor our history, and respect our great American flag. (Applause.)

We stand tall, we stand proud, and we only kneel to Almighty God. (Applause.)

This is who we are. This is what we believe. And these are the values that will guide us as we strive to build an even better and greater future.

Those who seek to erase our heritage want Americans to forget our pride and our great dignity, so that we can no longer understand ourselves or America’s destiny. In toppling the heroes of 1776, they seek to dissolve the bonds of love and loyalty that we feel for our country, and that we feel for each other. Their goal is not a better America, their goal is the end of America.

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: In its place, they want power for themselves. But just as patriots did in centuries past, the American people will stand in their way — and we will win, and win quickly and with great dignity. (Applause.)

We will never let them rip America’s heroes from our monuments, or from our hearts. By tearing down Washington and Jefferson, these radicals would tear down the very heritage for which men gave their lives to win the Civil War; they would erase the memory that inspired those soldiers to go to their deaths, singing these words of the Battle Hymn of the Republic: “As He died to make men Holy, let us die to make men free, while God is marching on.” (Applause.)

They would tear down the principles that propelled the abolition of slavery in America and, ultimately, around the world, ending an evil institution that had plagued humanity for thousands and thousands of years. Our opponents would tear apart the very documents that Martin Luther King used to express his dream, and the ideas that were the foundation of the righteous movement for civil rights. They would tear down the beliefs, culture, and identity that have made America the most vibrant and tolerant society in the history of the Earth.

My fellow Americans, it is time to speak up loudly and strongly and powerfully and defend the integrity of our country. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA!

THE PRESIDENT: It is time for our politicians to summon the bravery and determination of our American ancestors. It is time. (Applause.) It is time to plant our flag and protect the greatest of this nation, for citizens of every race, in every city, and every part of this glorious land. For the sake of our honor, for the sake of our children, for the sake of our union, we must protect and preserve our history, our heritage, and our great heroes. (Applause.)

Here tonight, before the eyes of our forefathers, Americans declare again, as we did 244 years ago, that we will not be tyrannized, we will not be demeaned, and we will not be intimidated by bad, evil people. It will not happen. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA!

THE PRESIDENT: We will proclaim the ideals of the Declaration of Independence, and we will never surrender the spirit and the courage and the cause of July 4, 1776.

Upon this ground, we will stand firm and unwavering. In the face of lies meant to divide us, demoralize us, and diminish us, we will show that the story of America unites us, inspires us, includes us all, and makes everyone free.

We must demand that our children are taught once again to see America as did Rev. Martin Luther King, when he said that the Founders had signed “a promissory note” to every future generation. Dr. King saw that the mission of justice required us to fully embrace our founding ideals. Those ideals are so important to us — the founding ideals. He called on his fellow citizens not to rip down their heritage, but to live up to their heritage. (Applause.)

Above all, our children, from every community, must be taught that to be American is to inherit the spirit of the most adventurous and confident people ever to walk the face of the Earth.

Americans are the people who pursued our manifest destiny across the ocean, into the uncharted wilderness, over the tallest mountains, and then into the skies and even into the stars.

We are the country of Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, and Frederick Douglass. We are the land of Wild Bill Hickock and Buffalo Bill Cody. (Applause.) We are the nation that gave rise to the Wright Brothers, the Tuskegee Airmen — (applause) — Harriet Tubman, Clara Barton, Jesse Owens, George Patton — Gen. George Patton — the great Louis Armstrong, Alan Shepard, Elvis Presley, and Mohammad Ali. (Applause.) And only America could have produced them all. (Applause.) No other place.

We are the culture that put up the Hoover Dam, laid down the highways, and sculpted the skyline of Manhattan. We are the people who dreamed a spectacular dream — it was called: Las Vegas, in the Nevada desert; who built up Miami from the Florida marsh; and who carved our heroes into the face of Mount Rushmore. (Applause.)

Americans harnessed electricity, split the atom, and gave the world the telephone and the internet. We settled the Wild West, won two World Wars, landed American astronauts on the Moon — and one day very soon, we will plant our flag on Mars.

We gave the world the poetry of Walt Whitman, the stories of Mark Twain, the songs of Irving Berlin, the voice of Ella Fitzgerald, the style of Frank Sinatra — (applause) — the comedy of Bob Hope, the power of the Saturn V rocket, the toughness of the Ford F-150 — (applause) — and the awesome might of the American aircraft carriers.

Americans must never lose sight of this miraculous story. You should never lose sight of it, because nobody has ever done it like we have done it. So today, under the authority vested in me as President of the United States — (applause) — I am announcing the creation of a new monument to the giants of our past. I am signing an executive order to establish the National Garden of American Heroes, a vast outdoor park that will feature the statues of the greatest Americans to ever live. (Applause.)

From this night and from this magnificent place, let us go forward united in our purpose and rededicated in our resolve. We will raise the next generation of American patriots. We will write the next thrilling chapter of the American adventure. And we will teach our children to know that they live in a land of legends, that nothing can stop them, and that no one can hold them down. (Applause.) They will know that in America, you can do anything, you can be anything, and together, we can achieve anything. (Applause.)

Uplifted by the titans of Mount Rushmore, we will find unity that no one expected; we will make strides that no one thought possible. This country will be everything that our citizens have hoped for, for so many years, and that our enemies fear — because we will never forget that American freedom exists for American greatness. And that’s what we have: American greatness. (Applause.)

Centuries from now, our legacy will be the cities we built, the champions we forged, the good we did, and the monuments we created to inspire us all.

My fellow citizens: America’s destiny is in our sights. America’s heroes are embedded in our hearts. America’s future is in our hands. And ladies and gentlemen: the best is yet to come. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: USA! USA! USA!

THE PRESIDENT: This has been a great honor for the first lady and myself to be with you. I love your state. I love this country. I’d like to wish everybody a very happy Fourth of July. To all, God bless you, God bless your families, God bless our great military, and God bless America. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

https://thecongressionalinsider.com/read-president-trumps-pro-america-independence
-day-speech-from-mount-rushmore/
 


M




France's Cathedrals on Fire: 'The Final Stage of De-Christianization'?
by Giulio Meotti
July 25, 2020

If France keeps failing to protect its Christian identity, France as we know it will cease to exist. The recent fire at the Cathedral of St. Peter and St. Paul of Nantes on July 18 is believed to have been started deliberately. Only a year ago, a massive blaze nearly totally gutted the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris. After that, the historic Church of Saint-Sulpice in Paris caught fire, as well as the Basilica of Saint Denis. Pictured: Firefighters work to put out the flames at the Cathedral of Nantes on July 18, 2020. (Photo by Sebastien Salom-Gomis/AFP via Getty Images)

A leading curator of New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art, Keith Christiansen, was criticized for posting on Instagram a painting of Alexandre Lenoir saving France's monuments from the ravages of the French Revolution. Christiansen wrote: "Alexandre Lenoir battling the revolutionary zealots bent on destroying the royal tombs in Saint Denis. How many great works of art have been lost to the desire to rid ourselves of a past of which we don't approve. And how grateful we are to people like Lenoir who realized that their value — both artistic and historical — extended beyond a defining moment of social and political upheaval and change".

Christiansen was criticizing the current removal and desecration of historic monuments. He could not have known that, a few weeks later, another French cathedral would be vandalized and an ancient organ, which had survived Lenoir's revolutionary zealots, destroyed by the blaze.

The fire at the Cathedral of St. Peter and St. Paul of Nantes is believed to have been started deliberately. It was only a year ago that a massive blaze nearly totally gutted the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris. After that, the historic Church of Saint-Sulpice in Paris caught fire, as well as the Basilica of Saint Denis (the same depicted in the painting posted by Christiansen).

"The fire in Nantes Cathedral, after Notre-Dame de Paris, should make our elites reflect on the great disorder and the great change, decivilization is underway", Philippe de Villiers, the author and former French minister commented.

"In France there is a low-noise destruction of the Christian roots", said the philosopher Michel Onfray. "There are about one or two anti-Christian acts a day and it takes a burning cathedral to start talking about it".

Six major French cathedrals and churches have caught fire during the last year and a half: Notre Dame, Nantes, Rennes, Saint-Sulpice, Lavaur and Pontoise. Perhaps that is why historian Rémi Brague called the fire at Notre Dame "our 9/11". The Observatory of Religious Heritage listed a total of 20 French churches that caught fire in just one year.

Little publicized and less condemned, attacks against Christian places of worship in France are multiplying and reaching alarming proportions. The Nantes fire was simply the latest in a succession of church destructions that have been going on for years and have apparently not scandalized anyone.

Four years ago, the Saint-Nicolas Basilica in Nantes was almost destroyed by fire. It had completed a renovation in 2014 and was in perfect condition. The first reports in the French media about the vandalism of churches were published ten years ago. Last year, there was one week in which four French churches were desecrated.

Cardinal Robert Sarah, a Guinean prelate of the Catholic Church, wrote: "The desecration continues to grow in Europe. Recent acts on statues of the Virgin Mary in French churches show how much these gestures are the result of barbaric hatred. They call for reactions. Catholics can no longer remain silent".

Cardinal Sarah added:

"Desecration and vandalism in churches are the sad reflection of a sick civilization that gets caught up in the net of evil. Bishops, priests, faithful must keep strength and courage".

Some secular public figures have spoken out against the attacks. "Hands off my church!" read the title of a French petition of writers, journalists, politicians and university professors, who demanded the protection of churches.

Religious affairs expert Nina Shea wrote that the perpetrators are anarchists, thieves, militant leftists, Satanists and Islamists, who all share the same hate for France and Western civilization. Anti-Semitism seems to go hand-in-hand with anti-Christian sentiment. In France, synagogues are protected "like fortresses"; Jewish schools have been targeted by terror attacks, and Jews have been advised not to wear any religious symbols for their own safety.

Anti-Christian incidents have risen by 285% between 2008 and 2019.

The magazine Reveue des deux mondes called the attacks on churches "the tragedy of French churches". In addition, more than 5,000 French churches are threatened because of their decaying structures. 875 France's churches were vandalized in 2018. In 2019, 1,052 anti-Christian acts took place.

"I think there is a rising hostility in France against Christianity and the symbols of Christianity", noted Ellen Fantini, director of the Vienna-based Observatory of Intolerance and Discrimination Against Christians in Europe.

"Every day, at least two churches are profaned", French MP Valerie Boyer told the Sun.

Gilbert Collard, MP of the National Rally party, compared the fire in Nantes with the recent decision by the Turkish authorities to convert the former Cathedral of Hagia Sophia into a mosque. "The symbols go up in flames", he said.

In recent years, French churches have also been targeted by a series of provocations and attacks by Islamists. Dalil Boubakeur, rector of the Grand Mosque in Paris and the president of the French Council of Muslim Faith, asked France to turn the country's empty churches into mosques. In Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, in northern France, two Islamic State terrorists killed Father Jacques Hamel during a morning Mass. The shock was immediate and immense. Islamists were also planning to strike Notre-Dame de Paris and actually did succeed in conducting an ISIS-inspired terrorist attack on Strasbourg's Christmas Market.

Boubakeur's proposal reflects a realistic understanding of French Christian patrimony. "Abandoned, desecrated, transformed, churches are turned into performance halls, discos, restaurants, wine cellars... Everything to escape demolition", noted the journalist Marie de Greef-Madelin in the magazine Valeurs Actuelles. These transformations are sometimes called the "second life of France's churches". "At the current rate, France will lose 10% of its churches and chapels by 2030", predicts Édouard de Lamaze, president of the Observatory of Religious Heritage. "Either because they will be sold or because they will be destroyed".

The Basilica of Saint Denis, burial place of French kings, is already a Christian museum in an Islamized suburb of Paris, and the Cathedral of Notre-Dame, before the fire, had become a museum for tourists. "We have reached the final stage of de-Christianization", commented the political analyst Jerome Fourquet, as if the fires at its major cathedrals were a symbol of France's dispossession of a territory, a history and an identity.

"How much worse can it get depends on what line activists are willing to draw for themselves", noted Ellen Fantini, director of Vienna's Observatory of Intolerance and Discrimination Against Christians in Europe. "Will they stop at burning an empty church? Will they stop at decapitating statues?"

"We are at a crossroads" said the French author Alain Finkielkraut. "We must try everything, while it is still possible, to save our civilization. Our civilization is the Greek, Roman, Judeo-Christian heritage".

Europe is not an abstract construction. Its identity is determined by many sources. Christian identity is obviously the most important. If France keeps failing to protect it, France as we know it will cease to exist; it will become a different place entirely.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved.

This message may contain copyrighted material which is being made available for research of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, social justice issues, etc., and constitutes a "fair use" of such copyrighted material per section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this message is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research/educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 


JUNE 


The Reality of Global Depopulation
Family Statistics

M



THE REALITY OF GLOBAL DEPOPULATION
International Organization for the Family

Shocking new research has emerged showing the “jaw dropping” reality of global depopulation that has been occurring for decades now. According to a study funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and published last week in the British medical journal The Lancet, human fertility has plummeted to shockingly low levels, raising profound questions about how society will cope in just a few years.

How serious of a problem is depopulation becoming? By 2100, Italy’s population is projected to decline from 61 million to just 28 million. Japan and Spain will see their populations fall by over 50 percent. China’s population will decline by about 40 percent. Half of all nations are already below the replacement rate and by 2100 virtually every country on the planet will be experiencing population decline.

IOF has been sounding the alarm about population decline – sometimes referred to as a “demographic winter” – for years now. Our founder, Dr. Allan Carlson, is a world-renowned expert on the issue who has written about this dangerous phenomenon for decades, including most recently in a feature article for IOF’s iFamNews.com. In his most recent article, Dr. Carlson writes, “If current trends continue, strange shifts in the structure of populations will also occur. In 1950, 25 new births occurred for every person turning 80 years old. By 2100, only one. Where those over age 80 numbered 141 million in 2017, their cohort shall climb to 866 million by the end of this century, as the very old—briefly--inherit the earth.”

The demographic winter that the world is now experiencing raises profound questions for society about our future. Dr. Carlson mentions some of those here: “Who will provide and pay for the health care of the elderly? How will “pay-as-you-go” social security systems be funded when the numbers of workers plummet and recipients soar? What happens when immigrants—currently summoned in by some already aging nations to care for their old—no longer exist, from anywhere?”

IOF Is Fighting To Save Humanity

This sharp decline in population is no accident or natural phenomenon. It is the result of an intentional, incessant assault on the natural family. Again, Dr. Carlson writes, “This birth dearth is the result of decades of propaganda and social engineering funded, early on, by the Rockefeller Foundation and more recently by, among others, the Gates Foundation. This campaign has attacked motherhood as a burden or disease, funded aggressive campaigns of abortion and birth control, and assaulted the legal structures protecting the natural family.”

The only way to save humanity and to ensure a vibrant, robust future is to promote the natural family and enact policies that uplift and encourage the procreative institutions that bring the two halves of humanity together – marriage, respect for life, encouraging married couples to bear children, paying a “family wage” sufficient to support families with children, and providing support for child care and education alternatives that allow parents to control the upbringing of their children, among other policies.

IOF is leading the fight on these issues against the likes of billionaire leftist George Soros and population control zealots such as Bill Gates. Our opponents have billions to spend. We don’t have their billions, but we do have truth and the grassroots on our side.

TO HELP . . . please contact . .
Brian Brown  bbrown@profam.org 
Int. Organization for the Family
934 North Main Street
Rockford, Illinois 61103 
phone: 815-964-5819


FAMILY STATISTICS . . . .  children from fatherless homes are . . . 
5    X's more likely to commit suicide
32  X's more likely to run away
20  X's more likely to have behavior disorders
14  X's more likely to be involved in sexual abuse or commit rape
10  X's more likely to be involved in drug abuse

 

APRIL 


Youtube: Nuestra Herencia Hispánica  
Culture shock when going back to US Comments by Carl Camp

M


Youtube: Nuestra Herencia Hispánica  
Conference presentation by Pablo Victoria. historiador colombiano

 


M


Culture shock when going back to US
Comments by Carl Camp

campce@gmail.com
 

 


Mimi, This will surprise you !
People in the US have a strong tendency to oversimplify when it comes to other cultures.
For people of the US there is only one Mexico, for Mexicans in Mexico there are many Mexicos !
Not all Mexicans are the same even if they share the same passport or birth certificate.
Not all Mexican Natives are the same, there are many and have different culture, language, religion and isonomy.
All "racial" groups are represented. Mexico is also a country with many immigrants from other continents... therefore there is a great diversity.
In general, Mexico is not a racist country, unfortunately some are learning that from the US.
People of my generation are color blind. I have a personal anecdote, my best friend from kindergarden until he got married is one example. I had gone to the US for the first time just before his wedding and when I returned I said to him, "Irving eres Negro". In reality he was a mulatto, (his mother white and his father black), but he looked just like Barak Obama. 

Weather tends to make people behave differently depending on which region they are from. Our State division is artificial although it may have one two or more ethnic groups inhabiting it.
This is such a complex topic, the best way to learn about Mexico is to travel to the various regions. Spanish speakers will notice the different accents and expressions used in each. There is a richness of vocabulary in the Spanish spoken in the various regions.

The inhabitants are not homogeneous, there is quite a diversity.
The main differences in Mexicans are urban or country background.
And the differences between rich and poor in economic terms are relative.
This video should be self-explanatory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fswsaCp055g

The goals, outlook of life, needs are different for everyone and everyone is free to be as they like. Free university education is available to all that want it. There is no keeping up with the Jones..!
Happiness is also relative, money is not necessary to achieve happiness -it is only an instrument to acquire certain necessary things.
This is an example of the people of one region of the State of Jalisco mostly Spanish immigrants. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSszaVMqi0E&t=582s  
This example of franceses in Veracruz: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwt2brqdc-w
and others:
 
Obesity is due to high consumption of "American" soft drinks !!
There are many more Mexicos... it never gets boring !
Carlos

 

MARCH 

M

How to Refer to . . .  what you are:

 



The National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington recently removed and apologized for a racist page on its website.  7/22/2020  . . . .
Jarrett Stepman 


Jarrett Stepman, contributor to The Daily Signal and co-host of The Right Side of History podcast. Send an email to Jarrett. Author of  "The War on History: The Conspiracy to Rewrite America's Past."
One would reasonably expect to learn about history at a history museum.  Unfortunately, at some museums, it seems you’re increasingly likely to receive an ideological sermon instead.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture recently created an online portal called “Talking About Race.”

It was doing that, the museum said, to promote conversations about race that begin with “honesty, respect for others, and an openness to ideas and information that provide new perspectives.”

Two regimes are fighting an ideological war in America today. But what side are you on? And how can you sharpen up on how to defend your position? Learn more now >>

On that page was a since-deleted graphic on “whiteness” that was not only offensive to, well, pretty much everyone, but was also quite racist.

“White dominant culture, or whiteness, refers to the ways white people and their traditions, attitudes, and ways of life have been normalized over time and are now considered standard practices in the United States,” the graphic read. “And since white people still hold most of the institutional power in America, we have all internalized some aspects of white culture—including people of color.”

And what are those “aspects of white culture”?

There were some negative ones, like “master and control nature,” and the hilarious “steak and potatoes; ‘bland is best.’”

But there were countless others that simply seemed like good life practices, regardless of one’s skin tone, things such as “self-reliance,” “adherence to rigid time schedules,” “delayed gratification,” and commitment to the “nuclear family.”

Elsewhere on the web page, the museum labels “white supremacy” as an ideology in which white people are deemed “superior to nonwhite people.”

But the graphic, likely unintentionally, seemed to be promoting white supremacy by insinuating that nonwhite people are lazy, irresponsible, and perhaps have internalized “whiteness” qualities such as being “polite.”

After the chart was spotted and posted by Claremont Institute President Ryan Williams on Twitter, an online backlash prompted the museum to remove it and apologize.

“It is important for us as a country to talk about race. We thank those who shared concerns about our ‘Talking About Race’ online portal. We need these types of frank and respectful interchanges as we as a country grapple with how we talk about race and its impact on our lives,” the statement said, according to the Miami Herald. “We erred in including the chart. We have removed it, and we apologize.”

Despite the apology, one wonders how such a graphic was deemed appropriate to put up in the first place.

Of course, the website still contains incessant attacks on “white privilege” and references to the book “White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism” by author Robin DiAngelo.

“White fragility,” according to Columbia University associate professor John McWhorter, who is black, is “about how to make certain educated white readers feel better about themselves” and actually promotes a “dehumanizing condescension toward black people.”

It’s infuriating that the Smithsonian or any other publicly funded museum would promote such material. But this sort of bias is becoming increasingly common.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture has been embroiled in controversy and accusations of bias before.

When it opened in 2016, it failed to feature an exhibit on the career of Justice Clarence Thomas, currently the only black man on the Supreme Court. The museum initially only paid tribute to Anita Hill, the woman who leveled unproven accusations of sexual harassment against him.

What the latest incident, with the “whiteness” graphic, makes clear is how public memory and history should not simply be left to museums.

Many of those calling for the removal of “offensive” statues—which these days seems to include pretty much all of them—have suggested relocating them to museums.

But how can Americans trust museums to faithfully present history and not simply foist primarily hard-left political views on those who visit them or use their materials?

We see a similar problem with The New York Times’ so-called 1619 Project, which won a Pulitzer Prize. History is bent and distorted to fit a political narrative. It’s not about education, but re-education and indoctrination.

It’s clear that American institutions—whether they are our schools or national museums—are being used as vehicles to promote “critical race theory” and other divisive doctrines.

This radical transformation is accelerating. That’s why it’s essential for Americans who still believe in the truth to inform themselves and be willing to question and confront those who are cynically promoting this cultural revolution, which if left unchallenged will tear the country apart.

 


For the first time, Latinos are the largest group 
of Californians admitted to UC 

Teresa Watanabe Staff Writer , L.A Times, California

July 16, 2020



Cuban Immigrant: “Communists” Are Trying to Take Over America
Posted On 12 Jul 2020 by Shawn

Cuban immigrant Maximo Alvarez has made a hell of a life for himself in the United States. After coming to this country over 60 years ago, Alvarez worked his way up to become president of Sunshine Gasoline Distributors, raised a beautiful family, and made the absolute most out of the American dream. He carved out of a life for himself that would have been utterly impossible in his native Cuba, where freedom is little more than a distant memory. Invited to the White House last week to be part of a roundtable discussion with Hispanic leaders, Alvarez said that he now fears that the U.S. is following Cuba down a dark path.

“I arrived in this great country and almost 60 years later, I’m sitting next to the President of the United States talking about the American dream,” Alavarez said. “The only country in the world, no other country in the world that you can start a business from the trunk of your car and within a very few years with hard work, commitment, and all the core values that we learn from this very culture of ours, we can become very important to our future. We can become those people who make the next generation better than the one before. This is the only country. Why do you think you had to close the borders?

“Because everybody in the world wants to come over here,” he continued. “Nobody’s ever forced to come over here. We come over here, in my case because my parents chose that I would not be indoctrinated by the communist country, by the totalitarian country, by the totalitarian regime. They don’t educate children. Absolutely not. And this is something that we need to understand. What is happening in our backyard today, I experienced as an 11-year-old. I remember vividly all the promises that a guy named Castro gave, and how 99% of the people swallowed the pill.”

Alvarez said that he’s concerned that today’s younger generation is beginning to fall for some of the same tricks. Not in Cuba, though. In America.

Alvarez noted that when he came to this country, he was given nothing more than opportunity. “That,” he said, “is the most valuable thing in the world.”

“That’s the America that these people are trying to destroy today by using funny terms like socialism,” he said. “They’re not, they’re communists. Don’t ever forget that. I know our president understands that because he knows, he’s been all over the world. And you’re surrounded with great people, very loyal people, and we have our back.

“My father said: ‘Don’t lose this place because you’re never going to be as lucky as me. Because if you lose this place, you have no place to go,’” he said. “So with that, please keep that in mind. And please, people, explain that to our young people who are demonstrating out there. Don’t be useful idiots. Please understand what’s happening in our country. See what happens to our parents and see what is happening to America today.”

Sometimes it takes someone from the outside to understand just how unique and unprecedented and wonderful America really is. Is it perfect? Of course not. It never will be. But if we strip it down and destroy it, we will soon understand just how much we took for granted. Take a trip to Cuba and get a sneak preview.

 


M


Ocurrió hace 100 años

 

Recomendaciones para protegerse de la influenza española hace 100 años. Se la llamaba grippe. El nombre influenza vino después y no se originó en España. A México llegó desde el norte, de soldados que volvieron de Europa de la Gran

Guerra. Ver la careta, el cigarro, la alerta para no acercarse. Limpiaban las suelas con cloro, aquí ponen ventiladores. Mientras aprendieron cómo cuidarse, murieron cientos de miles de personas. Una tragedia. 

 


M

“Mil Islas”, el paraíso de Oaxaca desconocido por los turistas

 


El Universal

Mil Islas, en el municipio de San Pedro Ixcatlán, en el estado de Oaxaca, es un lugar desconocido para la mayoría de los viajeros. Es uno de los destinos menos populares del estado, pero no por eso deja de sorprender por sus paisajes de vegetación frondosa, enclavados en la Sierra Mazateca.

Se formó debido a la construcción de la presa Miguel Alemán, la cual, en los años cincuenta, inundó comunidades de la Cuenca del Papaloapan. Así surgieron varias decenas de islas de diferentes tamaños, desde unos cuantos metros y hasta de varios kilómetros cuadrados.

En total, son aproximadamente 47,000 hectáreas lo que abarca la presa y, dependiendo de la época del año y del nivel del agua es el número de islas que emergen, ya que algunas quedan completamente cubiertas por el agua.

Varias islas se encuentran deshabitadas pero otras más son pobladas por comunidades indígenas mazatecas, provenientes de los municipios San Miguel Soyaltepec, San Pedro Ixcatlán y San José Independencia.

Mil Islas es para viajeros aventureros, pues se encontrarán con un destino de infraestructura bastante rústica y con una carretera que no es de lo mejor.

La forma más fácil de llegar es ir del puerto de Veracruz a San Miguel Soyaltepec, de donde te embarcas hasta la comunidad de Cerro Quemado, Oaxaca. Si partes de la CDMX deberás manejar casi ocho horas hasta tu destino. Si sales en auto desde el centro de Oaxaca, el viaje será de seis horas, aproximadamente.

Estas comunidades, desde hace más de 10 años, iniciaron algunos proyectos para impulsar el turismo en la zona. Sin embargo, no despegó como se hubiera querido debido a la falta de promoción turística y al poco presupuesto asignado, comparados a los de otros destinos del estado de Oaxaca. Aun así, el lugar está de impacto y es un buen sitio para relajarse, alejarse de los tumultos y vivir una nueva experiencia.

En el Centro Ecoturístico Mil Islas, en Cerro Quemado, en el municipio de San Pedro Ixcatlán, ofrecen cabañas rústicas para pasar la noche, pero también puedes animarte a acampar en alguno de los islotes. En Mil Islas solo hay tres restaurantes.

Una de las principales actividades son los paseos en lancha  para conocer el entorno y aprender cómo es la vida de sus habitantes. Si buscas una escapada por tu cuenta, en el centro ecoturístico rentan el equipo necesario para remar en kayak.

Otras formas de recorrer Cerro Quemado y apreciar sus paisajes naturales es por medio de recorridos en bicicleta o cabalgatas. Tanto los caballos como las bicicletas puedes rentarse ahí mismo.

Guías locales organizan tours para la observación de aves que habitan en la Presa Miguel Alemán. Verás gavilanes, garzas, chachalacas y patos buzos.

Hay otras  caminatas para apreciar de la flora y demás fauna del lugar habitado por reptiles: tortugas, serpientes, iguanas y boas.

Si quieres tener una mejor vista para apreciar por completo Mil Islas y tomar fotos, lo recomendable es ir a los miradores que se encuentran en Cerro Quemado.

También te llevan a explorar varias cuevas, como la caverna Cabeza de Tilpan, una formación rocosa con una profundidad de 100 metros. Hay dos maneras de poder visitarla: durante una caminata o a bordo de una lancha, aunque se recomienda la primera ya que podrás ir observando la vegetación del lugar y los diferentes cultivos que hay como de vainilla, lichi, plátano, yuca, entre otros.

https://www.rioaxaca.com/2020/07/09/mil-islas-el-paraiso-de-oaxaca-desconocido
-por-los-turistas/?fbclid=IwAR39b33IPzqzp6uflx_zGFVp1GHRNzwrGglzU7yH6tjERFInIxSvm40d8PQ
 

 


M


El espanol en Estados Unidos 

A pesar de que actualmente el inglés es la lengua más hablada y usada en los Estados Unidos de América, esto no siempre fue así, pues hubo un tiempo en el que solo se hablaban las lenguas nativas y el español. Nada de inglés. El español fue de hecho el primer idioma europeo que se habló en lo que hoy conocemos como Estados Unidos. El primer europeo en llegar al actual territorio estadounidense fue el español Juan Ponce de León en 1513. Sin embargo no fue hasta 1565 cuando se fundó la primera ciudad en lo que siglos después serían los Estados Unidos. Se trataba de la ciudad de San Agustín, en el actual estado de Florida. Y es que aunque expediciones como las de Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca, Pedro Menéndez de Avilés (fundador de la ciudad de San Agustín), Francisco de Coronado, Hernándo de Soto y Juan de Oñate, se desarrollaron durante el siglo XVI por todo el sur y oeste de los actuales Estados Unidos, no fue hasta finales del siglo siguiente cuando los españoles, y por ende su idioma, se establecieron de una forma más permanente en todo este vasto territorio. 

En concreto, la lengua española llegó mucho antes que la inglesa, sobre todo en territorios de los actuales estados de California, Arizona, Nuevo México, Texas y Florida. Los nombres de muchos otros estados son españoles o nativos, entre otros Montaña, Nevada, Orejón, Por su parte, los ingleses (sin el permiso de España-llegando cómo invasores) llegaron a territorio estadounidense en 1607, casi un siglo más tarde que los españoles, y fundaron el asentamiento de Jamestown en el estado actual de Virginia. Sin embargo, su uso no se generalizó hasta el siglo XIX, ya que el inglés no era la única lengua vehicular. De hecho, el alemán podría haber sido la lengua de la nueva nación debido a que ésta fue de uso habitual durante el siglo XVIII en el nordeste de los actuales Estados Unidos. 

El idioma español está en caída libre en EEUU pese al aumento de la inmigración latina

En Estados Unidos existe un debate constante bastante acalorado sobre la inmigración, pero hay un tema que suele pasar de largo: el idioma. Nadie habla de la posible amenaza de lengua de los inmigrantes hispanohablantes para el dominio del inglés en los Estados Unidos.

El lenguaje y la inmigración siempre han ido de la mano en los Estados Unidos, sobre todo en términos políticos. Cuando en 2006 la ciudad de Farmers Branch del estado de Texas introdujo la "normativa" de solo hablar inglés, Tim O'Hare, el alcalde por aquél entonces, la justificó diciendo que "es necesario hacer frente al tema de la inmigración ilegal en nuestra ciudad y tenemos que actuar ya".

El consejo de la ciudad de Farmers Branch votó por unanimidad para abolir la controvertida ordenanza en noviembre del año pasado, pero sigue habiendo 31 estados y cientos de ciudades en los Estados Unidos donde existen leyes locales sobre el uso exclusivo del inglés o sobre "el inglés como lengua oficial".

Mucha gente cree que la inmigración latina ha hecho que el español margine o incluso supere al inglés como lengua de uso en los Estados Unidos. Después de todo, el español es el segundo idioma más hablado en el país, después del inglés. Lo hablan 48,6 millones de personas34,8 millones son hablantes de español mayores de 5 años y de diferentes nacionalidades, 11 millones son inmigrantes latinoamericanos indocumentados y se estima que hay 2,8 millones de personas que no son latinas y que utilizan el español en casa

 

EN MAGNET
Hablar con un acento regional penaliza económicamente hasta un 20% en el sueldo

 


Los datos demográficos del censo de EE.UU prevén que para el año 2060 la población latina de los EE.UU (el grupo que más habla español) crecerá un 115 por ciento hasta llegar a los 119 millones.

Pero estas cifras no cuentan toda la historia. Como lingüista, he estudiado el bilingüismo español-inglés en Texas, California, Florida y otros estados de Estados Unidos. Puedo asegurar que el español no está conquistando el país, sino todo lo contrario: a pesar de los temores de los políticos, el español tiene una posición más bien débil en el país.

El corte de la tercera generación

¿Cómo puede ser que la población de latinos crezca tan rápido y que el número de hispanoparlantes se mantenga? La respuesta está en las peculiaridades que se pasan por alto en cuanto a los datos del censo y en la particular historia lingüística de los Estados Unidos.

Si echamos un vistazo a los tipos de inmigración durante los últimos cincuenta años, es verdad que en los Estados Unidos cada vez hay más hispanoparlantes. Desde 1965 a 2005 casi la mitad de los inmigrantes procedían de países de América Latina, algo que supuso añadir unos 30 millones de personas a la población estadounidense, la mayoría hablantes de español.


Pero es solo la mitad de la historia. Aunque los nuevos inmigrantes hablen español, la investigación demuestra que sus hijos suelen ser bilingües y que la mayoría prefieren hablar inglés. Como resultado, es probable que los nietos de los inmigrantes solamente hablen inglés. Los lingüistas llaman a este fenómeno "el patrón de las tres generaciones". Resumiendo, significa que las lenguas en Estados Unidos que no sean inglés se pierden en la segunda o en la tercera generación.

Esto es algo que se muestra en los datos del centro de estudios hispánicos. Las encuestas demuestran que en el año 2000 un 48 por ciento de las personas adultas latinas de entre 50 y 68 años hablaban "solo inglés" o tenían "un alto nivel de inglés" y que el porcentaje era del 73 por ciento en los niños latinos de entre 5 y 17 años.

Para e año 2014 dichas cifras habían pasado del 52 al 88 por ciento, respectivamente. En otras palabras, el cambio de español a inglés está ocurriendo en todo el país, con el paso del tiempo y entre generaciones.

¿Por qué el inglés es la lengua dominante?

El cambio de idioma no es un fenómeno que ocurra de forma natural, sino que se trata de una consecuencia de las presiones culturales que hacen que los hablantes se sientan presionados para dejar de hablar una lengua a favor de otra. Estas presiones incluyen las leyes restrictivas del idioma que prohíben formalmente el uso del español en ambientes educativos o gubernamentales, tal y como ocurrió en la ciudad de Farmers Branch hace 11 años.

Los colegios también son responsables del patrón de tres generaciones. Aunque los padres latinoamericanos suelan hablar a sus hijos nacidos en Estados Unidos en español, dichos niños suelen asistir a colegios donde solo se habla inglés. En dichos centros aprenden que el éxito académico se logra hablando inglés. Como resultado, los hijos de primera generación amplían su vocabulario y sus conocimientos en inglés, no en español.

 

También puede que tengan experiencias negativas hacia el español por parte de los profesores y de sus compañeros. Por ejemplo, en octubre de 2017, un profesor de un instituto de Nueva Jersey fue grabado en vídeo reprimiendo a tres estudiantes por hablar español y pidiéndoles que hablaran "americano". El hecho de que ese idioma ni exista deja el mensaje bastante claro.

La presión social para hablar inglés es tan fuerte que los padres inmigrantes latinos pueden ver como sus hijos evitan habla español en casa desde la guardería. Una generación después, aunque los abuelos sigan usando el español en casa, los nietos muchas veces les responderán en inglés.

Los numerosos blogs, páginas webs y guías dedicados a ayudar a los padres latinos a comprender el bilingüismo son un indicador de la normalidad del cambio de idiomas. De hecho, cuando les pregunto a mis alumnos latinos sobre qué idioma hablan y con quién, la respuesta es casi siempre la misma: español con los padres e inglés con el resto.

El inglés sigue al alza

Esto es algo que sigue ocurriendo en ciudades pequeñas y grandes, en la Costa Este y en la Costa Oeste, y en ciudades con poblaciones latinas grandes y pequeñas. Desde Chicago a Carolina del Sur, los hijos de los inmigrantes hispanohablantes prefieren hablar inglés. El cambio de español a inglés también ocurre en Miami, donde más del 65 por ciento de la población es latina y donde hablar español tiene claros beneficios. De hecho en Miami hay problemas para encontrar suficientes profesores que hablen español para dar clase en los colegios públicos.

El español no es la única lengua de inmigrantes que ha tenido problemas para mantener su hueco en los EE. UU. Los alemanes, los italianos, los polacos y los suecos vivieron cambios similares de idiomas en los siglos XIX y XX. Estas lenguas también fueron vistas en su día como una amenaza para la identidad americana.

Tanto entonces como ahora, el miedo entre los americanos sobre el papel del inglés en la sociedad es algo completamente infundado. En los casi 150.000 años de historia del lenguaje humano, nunca ha habido una lengua más segura que el inglés.

En el mundo existe más gente que habla chino mandarín o español como lengua materna, pero con casi 400 millones de hablantes nativos y más de 500 millones de hablantes de inglés adoptivos, el inglés tiene una posición a nivel mundial superior a cualquier otra de las 6.000 lenguas que se hablan en el mundo desde hace medio siglo.

Si el número de inmigrantes latinos desciende notablemente en los Estados Unidos, el cambio de idioma podría hacer que el español desaparezca del país. El inglés, por el contrario, no se va a ir a ninguna parte de momento. The Conversation

Imagen | Molly Adams/Flickr

Autor: Phillip M Carter, Florida International University.

Este artículo ha sido publicado originalmente en The Conversation. Puedes leer el artículo original aquí.

Traducido por Silvestre Urbón.

https://magnet.xataka.com/en-diez-minutos/idioma-espanol-esta-caida-
libre-eeuu-pese-al-aumento-inmigracion-latina

 

https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-47339095  
Materiales encontrados por C. Campos y Escalante (campce@gmail.com)

 

 


FEBRUARY


The Roots of Our Partisan Divide
A Canadian, Ernie Meggisen's view of President Trump
The



The Roots of Our Partisan Divide

February 2020

Christopher Caldwell, Senior Fellow, 
The Claremont Institute and Author, The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties

 

The following is adapted from a talk delivered on January 28, 2020, at Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., as part of the AWC Family Foundation lecture series.

American society today is divided by party and by ideology in a way it has perhaps not been since the Civil War. I have just published a book that, among other things, suggests why this is. It is called The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties. It runs from the assassination of John F. Kennedy to the election of Donald J. Trump. You can get a good idea of the drift of the narrative from its chapter titles: 1963, Race, Sex, War, Debt, Diversity, Winners, and Losers.

I can end part of the suspense right now—Democrats are the winners. Their party won the 1960s—they gained money, power, and prestige. The GOP is the party of the people who lost those things.

One of the strands of this story involves the Vietnam War. The antiquated way the Army was mustered in the 1960s wound up creating a class system. What I’m referring to here is the so-called student deferment. In the old days, university-level education was rare. At the start of the First World War, only one in 30 American men was in a college or university, so student deferments were not culturally significant. By the time of Vietnam, almost half of American men were in a college or university, and student deferment remained in effect until well into the war. So if you were rich enough to study art history, you went to Woodstock and made love. If you worked in a garage, you went to Da Nang and made war. This produced a class division that many of the college-educated mistook for a moral division, particularly once we lost the war. The rich saw themselves as having avoided service in Vietnam not because they were more privileged or—heaven forbid—less brave, but because they were more decent.

Another strand of the story involves women. Today, there are two cultures of American womanhood—the culture of married women and the culture of single women. If you poll them on political issues, they tend to differ diametrically. It was feminism that produced this rupture. For women during the Kennedy administration, by contrast, there was one culture of femininity, and it united women from cradle to grave: Ninety percent of married women and 87 percent of unmarried women believed there was such a thing as “women’s intuition.” Only 16 percent of married women and only 15 percent of unmarried women thought it was excusable in some circumstances to have an extramarital affair. Ninety-nine percent of women, when asked the ideal age for marriage, said it was sometime before age 27. None answered “never.”

But it is a third strand of the story, running all the way down to our day, that is most important for explaining our partisan polarization. It concerns how the civil rights laws of the 1960s, and particularly the Civil Rights Act of 1964, divided the country. They did so by giving birth to what was, in effect, a second constitution, which would eventually cause Americans to peel off into two different and incompatible constitutional cultures. This became obvious only over time. It happened so slowly that many people did not notice.

Because conventional wisdom today holds that the Civil Rights Act brought the country together, my book’s suggestion that it pulled the country apart has been met with outrage. The outrage has been especially pronounced among those who have not read the book. So for their benefit I should make crystal clear that my book is not a defense of segregation or Jim Crow, and that when I criticize the long-term effects of the civil rights laws of the 1960s, I do not criticize the principle of equality in general, or the movement for black equality in particular.

What I am talking about are the emergency mechanisms that, in the name of ending segregation, were established under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These gave Washington the authority to override what Americans had traditionally thought of as their ordinary democratic institutions. It was widely assumed that the emergency mechanisms would be temporary and narrowly focused. But they soon escaped democratic control altogether, and they have now become the most powerful part of our governing system.

How Civil Rights Legislation Worked

There were two noteworthy things about the civil rights legislation of 1964 and 1965.

The first was its unprecedented concentration of power. It gave Washington tools it had never before had in peacetime. It created new crimes, outlawing discrimination in almost every walk of public and private life. It revoked—or repealed—the prevailing understanding of freedom of association as protected by the First Amendment. It established agencies to hunt down these new crimes—an expanded Civil Rights Commission, an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and various offices of civil rights in the different cabinet agencies. It gave government new prerogatives, such as laying out hiring practices for all companies with more than 15 employees, filing lawsuits, conducting investigations, and ordering redress. Above all, it exposed every corner of American social, economic, and political life to direction from bureaucrats and judges.

To put it bluntly, the effect of these civil rights laws was to take a lot of decisions that had been made in the democratic parts of American government and relocate them to the bureaucracy or the judiciary. Only with that kind of arsenal, Lyndon Johnson and the drafters thought, would it be possible to root out insidious racism.

The second noteworthy thing about the civil rights legislation of the 1960s is that it was kind of a fudge. It sat uneasily not only with the First Amendment, but with the Constitution as a whole. The Voting Rights Act of 1965, passed largely to give teeth to the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal rights for all citizens, did so by creating different levels of rights for citizens of southern states like Alabama and citizens of northern states like Michigan when it came to election laws.

The goal of the civil rights laws was to bring the sham democracies of the American South into conformity with the Constitution. But nobody’s democracy is perfect, and it turned out to be much harder than anticipated to distinguish between democracy in the South and democracy elsewhere in the country. If the spirit of the law was to humiliate Southern bigots, the letter of the law put the entire country—all its institutions—under the threat of lawsuits and prosecutions for discrimination.

Still, no one was too worried about that. It is clear in retrospect that Americans outside the South understood segregation as a regional problem. As far as we can tell from polls, 70-90 percent of Americans outside the South thought that blacks in their part of the country were treated just fine, the same as anyone else. In practice, non-Southerners did not expect the new laws to be turned back on themselves.

The Broadening of Civil Rights

The problem is that when the work of the civil rights legislation was done—when de jure segregation was stopped—these new powers were not suspended or scaled back or reassessed. On the contrary, they intensified. The ability to set racial quotas for public schools was not in the original Civil Rights Act, but offices of civil rights started doing it, and there was no one strong enough to resist. Busing of schoolchildren had not been in the original plan, either, but once schools started to fall short of targets established by the bureaucracy, judges ordered it.

Affirmative action was a vague notion in the Civil Rights Act. But by the time of the Supreme Court’s 1978 Bakke decision, it was an outright system of racial preference for non-whites. In that case, the plaintiff, Alan Bakke, who had been a U.S. Marine captain in Vietnam, saw his application for medical school rejected, even though his test scores were in the 96th, 94th, 97th, and 72nd percentiles. Minority applicants, meanwhile, were admitted with, on average, scores in the 34th, 30th, 37th, and 18th percentiles. And although the Court decided that Bakke himself deserved admission, it did not do away with the affirmative action programs that kept him out. In fact, it institutionalized them, mandating “diversity”—a new concept at the time—as the law of the land.

Meanwhile other groups, many of them not even envisioned in the original legislation, got the hang of using civil rights law. Immigrant advocates, for instance: Americans never voted for bilingual education, but when the Supreme Court upheld the idea in 1974, rule writers in the offices of civil rights simply established it, and it exists to this day. Women, too: the EEOC battled Sears, Roebuck & Co. from 1973 to 1986 with every weapon at its disposal, trying to prove it guilty of sexism—ultimately failing to prove even a single instance of it.

Finally, civil rights came to dominate—and even overrule—legislation that had nothing to do with it. The most traumatic example of this was the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. This legislation was supposed to be the grand compromise on which our modern immigration policy would be built. On the one hand, about three million illegal immigrants who had mostly come north from Mexico would be given citizenship. On the other hand, draconian laws would ensure that the amnesty would not be an incentive to future migrants, and that illegal immigration would never get out of control again. So there were harsh “employer sanctions” for anyone who hired a non-citizen. But once the law passed, what happened? Illegal immigrants got their amnesty. But the penalties on illegal hiring turned out to be fake—because, to simplify just a bit, asking an employee who “looks Mexican” where he was born or about his citizenship status was held to be a violation of his civil rights. Civil rights law had made it impossible for Americans to get what they’d voted for through their representatives, leading to decades of political strife over immigration policy that continues to this day.

A more recent manifestation of the broadening of civil rights laws is the “Dear Colleague” letter sent by the Obama Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights in 2011, which sought to dictate sexual harassment policy to every college and university in the country. Another is the overturning by judges of a temporary ban on entry from certain countries linked to terrorism in the first months of the Trump administration in 2017.

These policies, qua policies, have their defenders and their detractors. The important thing for our purposes is how they were established and enforced. More and more areas of American life have been withdrawn from voters’ democratic control and delivered up to the bureaucratic and judicial emergency mechanisms of civil rights law. Civil rights law has become a second constitution, with powers that can be used to override the Constitution of 1787.

The New Constitution

In explaining the constitutional order that we see today, I’d like to focus on just two of its characteristics.

First, it has a moral element, almost a metaphysical element, that is usually more typical of theocracies than of secular republics. As we’ve discussed, civil rights law gave bureaucrats and judges emergency powers to override the normal constitutional order, bypassing democracy. But the key question is: Under what conditions is the government authorized to activate these emergency powers? It is a question that has been much studied by political thinkers in Europe. Usually when European governments of the past bypassed their constitutions by declaring emergencies, it was on the grounds of a military threat or a threat to public order. But in America, as our way of governing has evolved since 1964, emergencies are declared on a moral basis: people are suffering; their newly discovered rights are being denied. America can’t wait anymore for the ordinary democratic process to take its course.

A moral ground for invoking emergencies sounds more humane than a military one. It is not. That is because, in order to justify its special powers, the government must create a class of officially designated malefactors. With the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the justification of this strong medicine was that there was a collection of Southern politicians who were so wily and devious, and a collection of Southern sheriffs so ruthless and depraved, that one could not, and was not morally obliged to, fight fair with them.

That pattern has perpetuated itself, even as the focus of civil rights has moved to American institutions less obviously objectionable than segregation. Every intervention in the name of rights requires the identification of a malefactor. So very early on in the gay marriage debate, those who believed in traditional marriage were likened to segregationists or to those who had opposed interracial marriage.

Joe Biden recently said: “Let’s be clear: Transgender equality is the civil rights issue of our time. There is no room for compromise when it comes to basic human rights.” Now, most Americans, probably including Joe Biden, know very little about transgenderism. But this is an assertion that Americans are not going to be permitted to advance their knowledge by discussing the issue in public or to work out their differences at the ballot box. As civil rights laws have been extended by analogy into other areas of American life, the imputation of moral non-personhood has been aimed at a growing number of people who have committed no sin more grievous than believing the same things they did two years ago, and therefore standing in the way of the progressive juggernaut.

The second characteristic of the new civil rights constitution is what we can call intersectionality. This is a sociological development. As long as civil rights law was limited to protecting the rights of Southern blacks, it was a stable system. It had the logic of history behind it, which both justified and focused its application. But if other groups could be given the privilege of advancing their causes by bureaucratic fiat and judicial decree, there was the possibility of a gradual building up of vast new coalitions, maybe even electoral majorities. This was made possible because almost anyone who was not a white heterosexual male could benefit from civil rights law in some way.

Seventy years ago, India produced the first modern minority-rights based constitution with a long, enumerated list of so-called “scheduled tribes and castes.” Eventually, inter-group horse trading took up so much of the country’s attention that there emerged a grumbling group of “everyone else,” of “ordinary Indians.” These account for many of the people behind the present prime minister, Narendra Modi. Indians who like Modi say he’s the candidate of average citizens. Those who don’t like him, as most of the international media do not, call him a “Hindu nationalist.”

We have a version of the same thing happening in America. By the mid-1980s, the “intersectional” coalition of civil rights activists started using the term “people of color” to describe itself. Now, logically, if there really is such a thing as “people of color,” and if they are demanding a larger share of society’s rewards, they are ipso facto demanding that “non–people of color” get a smaller share. In the same way that the Indian constitution called forth the idea of a generic “Hindu,” the new civil rights constitution created a group of “non–people of color.” It made white people a political reality in the United States in a way they had never been.

Now we can apply this insight to parties. So overpowering is the hegemony of the civil rights constitution of 1964 over the Constitution of 1787, that the country naturally sorts itself into a party of those who have benefitted by it and a party of those who have been harmed by it.

A Party of Bigots and a Party of Totalitarians

Let’s say you’re a progressive. In fact, let’s say you are a progressive gay man in a gay marriage, with two adopted children. The civil rights version of the country is everything to you. Your whole way of life depends on it. How can you back a party or a politician who even wavers on it? Quite likely, your whole moral idea of yourself depends on it, too. You may have marched in gay pride parades carrying signs reading “Stop the Hate,” and you believe that people who opposed the campaign that made possible your way of life, your marriage, and your children, can only have done so for terrible reasons. You are on the side of the glorious marchers of Birmingham, and they are on the side of Bull Connor. To you, the other party is a party of bigots.

But say you’re a conservative person who goes to church, and your seven-year-old son is being taught about “gender fluidity” in first grade. There is no avenue for you to complain about this. You’ll be called a bigot at the very least. In fact, although you’re not a lawyer, you have a vague sense that you might get fired from your job, or fined, or that something else bad will happen. You also feel that this business has something to do with gay rights. “Sorry,” you ask, “when did I vote for this?” You begin to suspect that taking your voice away from you and taking your vote away from you is the main goal of these rights movements. To you, the other party is a party of totalitarians.

And that’s our current party system: the bigots versus the totalitarians.

If either of these constitutions were totally devoid of merit, we wouldn’t have a problem. We could be confident that the wiser of the two would win out in the end. But each of our two constitutions contains, for its adherents, a great deal worth defending to the bitter end. And unfortunately, each constitution must increasingly defend itself against the other.

When gay marriage was being advanced over the past 20 years, one of the common sayings of activists was: “The sky didn’t fall.” People would say: “Look, we’ve had gay marriage in Massachusetts for three weeks, and I’ve got news for you! The sky didn’t fall!” They were right in the short term. But I think they forgot how delicate a system a democratic constitutional republic is, how difficult it is to get the formula right, and how hard it is to see when a government begins—slowly, very slowly—to veer off course in a way that can take decades to become evident.

Then one day we discover that, although we still deny the sky is falling, we do so with a lot less confidence.


This message may contain copyrighted material which is being made available for research of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, social justice issues, etc., and constitutes a "fair use" of such copyrighted material per section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this message is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research/educational purposes. For more information go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 




A Canadian, Ernie Meggisen's view of President Trump,
who does not necessarily like President Trump


"Make no mistake...I'm not posting this for debate.  
I don’t want your commentary. . . . Unfollow or unfriend me if it makes you feel better. 
Just consider this...  When you think that your President Trump is a jerk; HE IS... He’s a New Yorker..  He’s crude and can be downright rude.  Some say he's a thin-skinned, arrogant, bombastic ass.  ..No argument, even from most republicans if they're really honest.

He gets his feelings hurt and he’s a hot head. ..He hits back; harder. ...And he probably should Tweet less. But let me tell you what else he is...And if you disagree with this that's your privilege. 

But in that case my friend, you'd be DEAD WRONG!!!  ..And here's why; 
He's a guy who DEMANDS performance.

And more . . .  importantly; RESULTS!!  

He spent his entire life in the private sector where you either produce or get your ass fired! 

He's a guy who asks lots of questions. ..And the questions he asks aren’t cloaked in fancy “political” phrases; they are “Why the hell...?” questions.

For decades, the health industry has thrown away billions of face masks after one use. ...Trump asks, “Why are we throwing them away?  Why not sterilize them and use them numerous times?” (Good question.)

He’s the guy who gets hospital ships readied in one week when it would have taken a bureaucrat weeks or months or never to get it done.

He’s the guy who gets temporary hospitals built in three days.
 
He’s the guy who gets auto industries to restructure to build ventilators in a business that’s highly regulated by agencies that move like sloths.
He’s the guy who asks “Why aren’t we using drugs that might work on people who are dying; what the hell do we have to lose?” (Another good question.) He’s the guy who restricted travel from China when the democrats and liberal media were screaming “xenophobia” and “racist.”  ..Now they’re wanting to know why he didn’t react sooner?  When he shut down the borders in the early days of the corona virus, the democrats screamed even LOUDER.  ..Then the rest of the world, including the European Union quickly restricted travel between their own member countries.
He’s the guy who campaigned on securing the border - protecting America - in the face of screaming democrats and the liberal media. ...And these SAME leaders of your democrat party (both the Clintons, Chucky Schumer, Harry Reed, Barack Obama, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi et al...)  ALL were in FAVOR of constructing the wall 'UNTIL' Trump had the fortitude to actually do it!!!
Now your comeback might be:  'Oh, he said Mexico was going to pay for it'..  Does that ring a bell?  Well let me quickly set you straight on this one:  Have you compared the old EXTREMELY one-sided NAFTA agreement (negotiated by none other than Jimmy 'peanuts' Carter) with the NEW U.S.M.C. agreement?  Well I have...And let me tell you this:  Mexico will now end up paying much MORE for your goods than you will for theirs...And why you might ask??  Because they're far more    reliant    on the U.S. than you are of them.  Yes, it will take time but the bottom line is;...They WILL end up paying for the wall just like Trump said all along!  .Admittedly as a Canadian, this new USMCA is certainly not as beneficial as NAFTA was for both my country and Mexico.  Previously our farmers had a huge monopoly over your farmers but 'fair is fair'...
 
Has Trump made mistakes? ..Of course.  You can't fault a person for being a human being.  Only ONE perfect man walk this earth 2000 years ago, Jesus!
 
Everyone I know has made mistakes and continues to make them and LEARNS from them.
 
Trump is, and has accomplished more than any U.S. President in my lifetime.  (I'm 77 years old)  ..He puts in 18 to 20 hour days. He isn’t hiding in his office; he’s out front - Briefing - ALL Americans almost everyday.
According to democrats and liberal media, when he offers hope he’s lying, and when he’s straight forward he should be hopeful. It’s a no-win situation for him every day with the haters and naysayers, but he is NOT deterred.

I’ll take THIS kind of leadership 6 days a week and TWICE on Sunday over a “polished, nice guy” politician who has seldom or never held a real private sector job in his or her adult life, reads prepared and “written by a speech-writer” speeches from a teleprompter and ONLY answers pre-scripted questions selected for him/her prior to the open forum.  (Sorry folks, but that's EXACTLY what your previous POTUS did.)

I am completely mystified as to why this man has been bombarded by the media and liberal electorate EVERY day since back in 2015 when he announced his run for the U.S. presidency.
And whether you want to believe it or not, Americans, let me tell you one more thing, if you REALLY think that Hillary would have accomplished even a fraction of the things for the betterment of the American public that POTUS Trump has, you've really got your head in the sand.

I can only wish he was MY President! - For the good of America, you'd better hope he's re-elected this November.

I DO!!!  "   ~Ernie Meggisen
 

Forwarded by Dolores Merino 

Caras y Caretas by Jose S. Alvarez, Founder




JANUARY 


Condecorada la española que dio a conocer a Gálvez en Estados Unidos

Nuestra América, una historia hispana de Estados Unidos por Fernández Armesto Felipe

Condecora da la española que dio a conocer a Gálvez en Estados Unidos

Teresa Valcarce recibe la Encomienda del Mérito Civil por lograr el homenaje con un retrato del héroe en el Senado estadounidense


«La Marca España la hacemos desde la sociedad civil. Reconocerlo puede ser un importante motivo de orgullo de ser español». Quien pronuncia esta frase al otro lado del teléfono con tanta convicción es Teresa Valcarce, una compatriota incansable que trabaja en una organización de profesores en EE.UU. -de hecho tiene doble nacionalidad-, y acaba de ser condecorada por el Gobierno de España con la Encomienda del Mérito Civil. Una medalla es agradable y ella se muestra muy feliz, pero le da vértigo pensar en el camino recorrido que ahora se le reconoce. En sus horas libres fue capaz de crear un lobby alrededor del Capitolio, que no se rindió frente a las dificultades, hasta lograr el reconocimiento oficial del héroe español Bernardo de Gálvez, por su papel decisivo en la independendia de EE.UU..

Los méritos que concurren en esta mujer conocida en Washington como «the lady of the portrait», la señora del cuadro, son tales que ese título se publicó en la portada de un suplemento del «Washington Post» el 31 de octubre de 2014, junto a una foto suya y del retrato de Gálvez pintado en Málaga por Carlos Monserrate. Meses antes, en diciembre de 2013, contábamos en ABC por primera vez su historia, cuando el retrato aún no había sido terminado.

 

Página del Washington Post de octubre de 2014

Todo comenzó cuando ella supo que un investigador español, Manuel Olmedo Checa, había encontrado un documento que demostraba que el Congreso Continental había prometido el 8 de mayo de 1783 que colgaría un retrato de Bernardo de Gálvez en su sede coo agradecimiento por su ayuda logística y militar en la independencia. Esa promesa olvidada fue reactivada por la Asociación Bernardo de Gálvez, de la que Olmedo Checa es el más conspicuo de sus miembros.

«Fueron casi dos años llamando a las puertas del Congreso de Estados Unidos, tratando de ser escuchada, revolviendo la legislación» Pero en las leyes no podía apoyarse, porque el Congreso no reconocía valor a las decisiones de la institución antecesora en el tiempo de las Trece Colonias.

«Un amigo jurista -relata Teresa Valcarce- me dio un baño de realidad cuando me dijo que mi única arma sería la persuasión porque las resoluciones de 1783 no tenían peso legal». Dicho y hecho. Después de generar toda la complicidad del mundo con Manuel Olmedo Checa, comenzó su campaña. Las puertas del congreso no se abrían y sin embargo las simpatías crecían alrededor.

«Ahora que he sido condecorada tengo que recordar a quienes me ayudaron, por supuesto Manuel Olmedo, y también las Hijas de la Revolución, porque siempre estuvieron ahí para lo que necesitara, incluso cuando me vi en la calle con el cuadro y me ofrecieron guardarlo en su museo». Le preguntaban ¿qué necesitas? ¿A quién llamamos? Y ayudaron con algunas puertas. «Son las ciudadanas más patriotas y enamoradas de la historia que he conocido nunca», añade Valcarce. No olvida tampoco a la asociación malagueña que le procuró el cuadro, la Bernardo de Gálvez, ni al que ya es su pueblo, Macharaviaya.

Un día hubo suerte y un congresista, tal vez sin ser consciente de lo que se le venía encima, la escuchó. «Fue Chris van Holen, entonces mi congresista de Maryland, el que me recibió. Cuando le conté toda la historia, se quedó boquiabierto y me espetó: repita lo que acaba de decir, desde el principio». Esa era la fuerza, la historia de una deuda contraída con un héroe de olvidado como la promesa de reconocimiento que Estados Unidos no había sabido cumplir. En un país mestizo, la historia era oro puro. «El río Hudson se llamaba antes San Antonio, el primer inmigrante en Manhattan era dominicano...»

Pero el Congreso rechazó la idea de poner el cuadro. «Con cada caída me levantaba más fuerte, porque veía mayor apoyo», rememora. Mensajes desde los dos lados del Atlántico le animaban a seguir. Y así llegó al Senado. «Fue Roberto Menéndez quien aceptó el cuadro, pero no podemos olvidar a Jeff Miller, ya retirado, porque él vio en este largo debate el momento idóneo para reactivar una moción rechazada en 2007, la de hacer a Gálvez ciudadano honorario, como ocurrió en diciembre de 2014». Y allí está el retrato, en la sala en la que el Senado recibe a mandatarios extranjeros. Teresa ha acudido alguna vez a verlo «porque llegar allí es difícil», nos dice, sin darse cuenta de que esa frase resume toda su porfía.

Entre las anécdotas de este viaje destaca que Guillermo Fesser, la mitad de Gomaespuma, también se sintió tocado por la historia de Gálvez y el ejemplo Teresa Valcarce. Ha publicado un libro titulado «Conoce a Bernardo de Gálvez» en el que ella tiene un papel nada decorativo. Con la ciudadanía honorífica y el cuadro en el Senado, lo cierto es que se ha impulsado el estudio en los colegios estadounidenses de la figura del héroe español y genuinamente americano, máxime en un momento en el que lo hispano está de actualidad. Algunos docentes emplean el libro en sus clases y allí descubren con sorpresa que «Mari Pancartas», la mujer que se manifestaba y llamaba a todas las puertas para defender a Galvez del olvido, existe en realidad. «Y a veces me laman y me siento muy orgullosa de ir a los colegios a hablar de don Bernardo y contar que, como decía María de Villota, logré lo que logré porque no sabía que era imposible».

Esta patriota incansable sigue la actualidad política española desde Washington con preocupación y tratando de explicar a sus hijos algo muy difícil de entender en un país siempre orgulloso de sus valores compartidos.

Con la condecoración recibida, esta Malagueña de adopción y orígenes gallegos se acuerda también de su familia, de su padre ya fallecido, de su madre, tan orgullosa, y de su hermana, la bromista que siempre le recuerda con sorna: «No olvides que saliste de Ferrol D. C. [entonces “del Caudillo”] a Washington D.C., y allí has triunfado».

Bernardo de Gálvez Ciudadano de honor de EE. UU.

Nació en Macharaviaya (Málaga), pero escribió su destino en América. Genuino héroe español (y americano), Bernardo de Gálvez vivió mucho y muy rápido: solo así se explica que lograse dejar tan honda huella en la Historia en tan solo 42 años de existencia.

En su juventud forjó su fuerte carácter luchando contra los apaches de México, lugar del que llegó a convertirse en Virrey. Se encargó, también, de asegurar el domino de España en el Caribe, tomando isla a isla todas las posesiones británicas, a excepción de Jamaica. Además, fue el puntal del apoyo secreto español a la independencia norteamericana, motivo por el cual hoy su retrato cuelga en una de las paredes del Senado de Estados Unidos.

De entre todas sus hazañas hay una que lo convirtió en inmortal: la conquista de Penascola, entonces Panzacola, en la costa de Luisiana. Cuando la flota comandada por José Calvo no se atrevía a pasar frente a las baterías británicas que guardaban la ciudad, Gálvez, a bordo del «Galveston», pasó, provocando la caída del bastión inglés de la Florida. Desde ese momento, lució en su escudo el lema «Yo solo», concedido por el Rey Carlos III el mismo día que lo nombró Conde.

Fue en Luisiana, ya como gobernador, donde logró tejer una red de espías con las que controló el Nuevo Mundo. Con su labia (era políglota), su carácter seductor y su vasta cultura logró dominar el arte de la diplomacia como pocos en su tiempo. Con esa misma red atrapó a los ingleses en el Misisipi, distrayéndolos, dividiendo sus esfuerzos, ayudando así a George Washington a alcanzar sus objetivos. Es algo que los americanos nunca han olvidado: una estatua de Gálvez en Washington se lo recuerda.

Found by: C. Campos y Escalante (campce@gmail.com)

Source:

https://www.abc.es/cultura/abci-condecorada-espanola-conocer-galvez-estados-unidos-201710130209
_noticia.html?fbclid=IwAR0RkBKqcso9UddJQNoPh0K40UVwdtjp_dNeZY7IuW2Z9z1x9rAEMWQcagk
 

 


M

Libro PDF - 
Nuestra América, una historia hispana de Estados Unidos
por Fernández Armesto Felipe

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1suUEUBcads
XnydwThAZ6SorkAmtCvQQq/view?usp=drivesdk

Found by: C. Campos y Escalante (campce@gmail.com)

 

 

 

                                        12/20/2020 06:47 AM