Chapter Eight New Mexico This
chapter gives life to a rich history of the North
American Continent Siberian Migrant Tribes (NACSMT)
or what we call today Native
Americans/Indigenous before and after the arrival of the
Spanish and the de Riberas. They
came to a land untouched by European technology and ready for
exploitation. Once
again, our thanks to the many sources available through the Internet and
the access to studies that it offers.
Like a wide,
deep, ocean history settles against the arid shores of the Southwest.
There in the high mountains of New Mexico water is a sacred
thing, giving life to everything it touches.
And it gave life to generations of NACSMT. The NACSMT
had been good stewards of the water and the land.
They intended on leaving it as they found it. Pre-historic and later,
historic events left their telltale signs on the windswept lands of New
Mexico and its many peoples. However,
before beginning the subject at hand we must discuss humans, mankind,
and its behavior as it relates to conduct and general relations between
humans. Why?
This is due to political correctness and its adherent’s
sleight-of-hand. It is one
thing to accept as wrong what a group or groups of human beings have
suffered at the hands of another. It
is quite a different thing to paint those offended groups as somehow
more ethical or honorable than others, simply because they suffered
these offenses. After all,
we are all humans and as such given to human failings. As
often happens, there are those who we read something and misunderstand
or misinterpret the intent of the writer.
Therefore, let me state clearly and unequivocally that I
do not condone what happened to any of the New World entrants,
particularly the NACSMT. War
is an ugly, evil thing and so are its results.
Mistreatment of anyone at anytime under any
circumstances is not acceptable and should
not be tolerated. We
humans are classed by our learned
scientific community as a branch of the “Great Apes.” They
describe us as having erect posture, bipedal locomotion, with manual
dexterity. We are said to
have increased the use of tools and exhibited a general trend toward
larger, more complex brains. As
a result, the societies in which we have lived and worked are complex
and ever changing. This view
of the human being is utilitarian and appears to be devoid of human
essence. This is to say that
it doesn’t touch upon the Great Ape’s “humanity.”
Let us flesh out the deeper meaning of what it is to be the
“Greatest of Apes.” Now
to the taking of a great leap for mankind! Our
“Humanity” or our “human essence” is said to be a virtue associated with basic ethics of altruism derived from the human
condition. We are informed
that humanity differs from mere justice in that there is a level of
altruism towards individuals included in humanity more so than
the fairness found in justice. That
is to say that humanity and acts of love, altruism, and social
intelligence are typically person-to-person strengths, while human
fairness is generally expanded and/or extended to all. This presupposes that we, the “Greatest of the Great
Apes,” is capable of understanding the meaning of existence beyond the
most basic aspects of that existence and is able to express this deeper
meaning and understanding through positive attributes and interactions.
To this I say, where is this human and the humanity we speak of?
Can we name one human group capable of this “virtue”?
If history is any indicator of past Great Ape performance, that
human does not, and has not resided on this planet.
In fact, the proposed virtue associated with basic ethics of
altruism derived from the human condition has had little impact upon
this entire blue ball found in our universe. Peterson & Seligman in Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
(2004) would have us believe that humanity is one of six virtues which
are consistent across all cultures.
It is proposed that the concept began with the development of
"humane" or "humanist" philosophy during the
Renaissance. Its
predecessors are found in 13th-Century C.E. scholasticism which stresses
a concept of basic human dignity inspired by Aristotelism. It is also considered a part of
the concept of humanitarianism in the early modern period, and resulted
in modern notions such as "human rights." Peterson
and Seligman have attempted to present a measure of humanist ideals of
virtue in an empirical, rigorously scientific manner.
These define strengths and virtues as "core virtues"
made up of twenty-four measurable character strengths.
They define character strengths as satisfying the majority of ten
established criteria. In
essence they view character strengths as fulfilling and intrinsically
valuable. In an ethical
sense they involve gifts, skills, aptitudes, and expertise which can be
squandered. However,
character strengths and virtues supposedly cannot be. The
following represents a grouping of those core virtues. 1.
Strengths of Wisdom and Knowledge: Cognitive
strengths that entail the acquisition and skillful use of knowledge. 1.1
Creativity & Imagination (originality, ingenuity): Thinking of novel
and productive ways to conceptualize and do things. 1.2
Curiosity (interest, novelty-seeking, and openness to experience):
Taking an interest in ongoing experience for its own sake; exploring and
discovering. 1.3
Open-mindedness (holistic judgment, critical thinking): Thinking things
through and examining them from all sides; weighing all evidence fairly. 1.4
Love of learning: Mastering new skills, topics, and bodies of knowledge,
whether on one’s own or formally. 1.5
Holistic perspective (wisdom): Being able to provide wise counsel to
others; having ways of looking at the world that make sense to oneself
and to other people. 2.
Strengths of Courage: Emotional
strengths that involve the exercise of will to accomplish goals in the
face of opposition, external and internal. 2.6
Bravery (valor): Not shrinking from threat, challenge, difficulty, or
pain; acting on convictions even if unpopular. 2.7
Persistence (perseverance, industriousness): Finishing what one starts;
persisting in a course of action in spite of obstacles. 2.8
Integrity (authenticity, honesty): Presenting oneself in a genuine way;
taking responsibility for one’s feeling and actions. 2.9
Vitality (zest, enthusiasm, vigor, energy): Approaching life with
optimism and energy; feeling alive and motivated. 3.
Strengths of Humanity: interpersonal
strengths that involve supporting and befriending others. 3.10
Love & Compassion: Valuing close relations with others, in
particular those in which sharing and caring are reciprocated. 3.11
Kindness (generosity, nurturance, care, compassion, altruistic love,
“niceness”): Doing favors and good deeds for others. 3.12
Social intelligence (emotional intelligence, personal intelligence):
Being aware of the motives and feelings of other people and oneself. 4.
Strengths of Justice: strengths
that underlie healthy and harmonious community life. 4.13
Citizenship (social responsibility, loyalty, teamwork): Working well as
a member of a group or team; being loyal to the group. 4.14
Fairness: Treating all people the same according to notions of fairness
and justice; not letting personal feelings bias decisions about others. 4.15
Leadership: Encouraging a group of which one is a member to get things
done and at the same maintain time good relations within the group. 5.
Strengths of Temperance: strengths that
protect against unhealthy excess and egotism. 5.
16 Forgiveness and mercy: Forgiving those who have done wrong; accepting
the shortcomings of others; giving people a second chance; not being
vengeful. 5.17
Humility/Modesty: Letting one’s accomplishments speak for themselves;
not regarding one’s self, as more special than one is. 5.
18 Prudence: Being careful about one’s choices; not taking undue
risks; not saying or doing things that might later be regretted. 5.19
Self-regulation (self-control): Regulating what one feels and does;
being disciplined; controlling one’s appetites and emotions
(equanimity). 6.
Strengths of Transcendence: strengths that forge connections to the larger universe and provide
meaning in life. 6.
20 Appreciation of beauty and excellence (awe, wonder, elevation):
Appreciating beauty, excellence, and/or skilled performance in various
domains of life. 6.
21 Gratitude: Being aware of and thankful of the good things that
happen; taking time to express thanks. 6.22
Hope (optimism, future-mindedness, future orientation): Expecting the
best in the future and working to achieve it. 6.23
Humor (playfulness): Liking to laugh and tease; bringing smiles to other
people; seeing the light side. 6.
24. Spirituality (religiousness, faith, purpose): Having coherent
beliefs about the higher purpose, the meaning of life, and the meaning
of the universe. When
one reviews the aforementioned, one must question what humanity the
authors are referencing. If
the planet’s history of mankind is any indication of the virtue held
by its humans, something is terribly wrong with this construct.
So, let us examine the virtuous humans. One source states that since the rise of the state some
5,000 years ago, military activity has occurred over much of the globe. The
advent of gunpowder and the acceleration of technological advances led
to modern warfare. According
to Conway W. Henderson, "One source claims that 14,500 wars
have taken place between 3500 B.C.E. and the Late-20th Century C.E.,
costing 3.5 billion lives, leaving only 300 years of peace
(Beer 1981: 20)." Let
us examine humans and their love of War.
For simplicity’s sake, a second source defines war as “an
active conflict that has claimed more than 1,000 lives.”
The most pressing question becomes, has the earth ever had peace?
The answer might trouble you.
According to this source, only 268 out of the past 3,400 years
have seen peace for humankind. This
represents just 8 percent of recorded history.
This begs the next question.
How many have died as a result of all wars?
There have supposedly been at least 108 million people killed in
wars of the 20th Century C.E. alone. The
total number killed in wars throughout all of human history is
estimated at 150 million to 1 billion. Statistics
aside, wars have numerous effects upon populations including the
decreasing of the birthrate. This
results when men leave their wives, they march off to war, and kill one
another. During World War
II, it is estimated that the birthrate was reduced and caused a
population deficit of more than 20 million people.
Obviously, there are many other negative impacts of war which we
do not have time to explore at this juncture. Another
important question to be considered is how many people around the world
serve in the military? One
recent source estimates that the combined armed forces of the entire
world stands at approximately 21.3 million. It
is China who has the world's largest army, with 2.4 million men and
women under arms. America
comes in second at 1.4 million. India
maintains an army of 1.3 million. North
Korea stands at 1 million and Russia at over 900,000. 14
of the world's 20 largest militaries are in developing nations. Another
important question is how many wars are taking place at any given time?
Sources provide that during the beginning of 2003, there were 30
wars going on around the world. These
conflicts included Afghanistan, Algeria, Burundi, China, Colombia, the
Congo, India, Indonesia, Israel, Iraq, Liberia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru,
the Philippines, Russia, Somalia, Sudan, and Uganda.
That was just twelve years ago.
Can you imagine how many wars are happening today? People
might question mankind’s aggressive nature and ask if there a genetic
reason why we make war? Experts
say that the simple answer is there is no single "war gene" in
humans. However there are
combinations of genes which might predispose an individual toward
violence. Scientists offer
that aggression is a product of biology and environment. In
this so-called civilized world, sources of aggressive dispositions might
include domestic violence, violence depicted in and by the media,
threats from perceived enemies, and the nature of combat training. On
might ask, is war essentially a male activity? Some
information provided claims that approximately 95-96 percent of today's
worldwide military personnel are male. It
is thought that this is a reflection of modern culture and our biology. Others
claim that between fifteen and seventeen percent of American military
personnel are females. Here
one might ask does a military support position held by females
constitute an act of warfare. Many
ask the question, can women fight as effectively and efficiently as men?
The answer is, yes. First,
it is suggested by some that fewer women are "natural
killers." Secondly, it
is a fact that women on average are smaller than men.
However, there are many women who possess the psychological
makeup and physical ability to make war. And
frankly, there are many men without these characteristics. To
be sure, women have in the past demonstrated valor in combat conditions. Given
the ugliness and deprivations brought about by war, why are civilians
attracted to it? Some say
that war is often characterized as honorable and noble. It
can be also be viewed by many as a contest between nations, a chance to
compete and be declared the victor. To
be sure, the basic outcomes of war and its associated violence can be
applied to all tribes, cultures, and nations at one time or another.
It is brutal, ugly, and fruitless.
All have engaged in it and all guilty of these outcomes.
This includes the NACSMT. The
term "Tribe" is contested by some as it is rooted in
colonialism. Herein is the
problem for me as I write this chapter.
When histories of geographic areas are written, inevitably one
must explain the peoples who live or lived there and under what
conditions they did so. If
modern European states are or were involved in such geographic areas,
there is a tendency to view their participation as strictly one of
invasion and colonization of the place.
I can accept that the first wave of NACSMT would be seen as
entering an empty place, therefore, migrants who settled there.
I can also accept that the next wave of NACSMT, the latest
entrants, would be seen as invaders and colonizers, just as applied to
Europeans. I’m sure that
some will call me anti-NACSMT for this view.
Oh well! Let us
proceed. As
the term “Tribe” has no shared referent for what the word or phrase denotes or stands for, one is
faced with a dilemma.
This includes whether the term is used in political form, kinship
relations or shared culture. Thus,
the term becomes subjective and unreliable in its context.
Some argue that it conveys a negative connotation of a timeless
unchanging past, as if the past and its experiences have no value.
This is the view of the modernist and his/her view of today’s
mega-state environment. To
avoid these negative implications, there are those who have chosen to
substitute the term with other terms such as "ethnic group",
or “nation” as if this remedies the problems associated with context
and non-objectivity. In
relation to this chapter, I have chosen to apply “NACSMT” to those
called by others “Native-American” or “Indigenous.”
This I see as simple, correct, and acceptable. It
was estimated recently that there were over one hundred and fifty
million tribal individuals worldwide.
These constituted approximately forty percent of indigenous
individuals at the time. Post-colonial
thinking and political correctness suggests that although nearly all
tribal people are also indigenous, there are some who are not indigenous
to the locals where they now live. These
suggest that it is important to make the distinction between tribal and
indigenous because tribal peoples have a special status acknowledged in
international law. My
preferred view is that all human tribes should have the same status.
Relative to this, one must ask the questions: Does anyone truly
own the land? When does a
tribe lose the right of ownership of the land?
What of the concept of the right of conquest? Historically
or developmentally, a tribe is viewed as a social group which existed
before the development of, or outside of, today’s states.
Those that share this definition view a “tribe” as a distinct
people, dependent on their land for their livelihood and who are largely
self-sufficient, not integrated into a national society.
This definition begs the question does the definition still apply
to modern changes to the status of the tribe?
What if the tribe is no longer largely self-sufficient or has
become integrated into society, albeit, on a limited basis? The
aforementioned description for the term is perhaps the most readily
understood and used by the general public in America.
This definition is readily applied to those Siberian tribal
peoples (NACSMT) that migrated to the North American Continent from
Siberia and settled the land. It
is also applied to those later groups of NACSMT which entered under
subsequent invasions (Migrations) and colonized (Settled) those regions
already inhabited by earlier arriving NACSMT.
I find it odd that the second and third migration waves of NACSMT
are referred to as migrants and not invaders/colonizers.
All other non-NACSMT tribes are referred to as invaders and
colonizers. Go figure. Survival
International at one point in time stated that it was the world’s only
organization dedicated to Indigenous rights. It
has its own definition for tribal people: "those which have
followed ways of life for many generations that are largely
self-sufficient, and are clearly different from the mainstream and
dominant society". This
definition, however, would not apply in countries in the Middle East,
where entire populations are members of one tribe or another and
therefore tribalism itself is dominant and mainstream. Here
I must offer that, how an organization wishes to apply a label to itself
and others is its own business and concern.
However, every organization is formed with vision, mission, and
values statements whether implicit or explicit.
These might not necessarily be fair or equitable to all involved.
One might say some organizations are self-serving and given to
adjusting the truth to enable the proper interpretation of outcomes as
they relate to their stakeholders. This
I find unfair to the other members of a society and/or the remainder of
the human race. Many
use the term "tribal society" to refer to societies organized
largely on the basis of social, especially familial, descent groups.
A customary tribe in these terms would be one which is a
face-to-face community, relatively bound by kinship relations,
reciprocal exchange, and strong ties to a place.
Let me take only one element of this description and explore it.
I hold strong ties to Santa Barbara, California.
Does this make me a part of a tribe of others who also love Santa
Barbara? I would think not. In
short, I view all groups of mankind as tribes of one kind or another.
No tribe should be held as above or below the others. One
definition for tribalism is “the state of being organized in, or
advocating for, a tribe or tribes.”
Relative to conformity, tribalism may also refer in popular
cultural terms to a way of thinking or behaving in which people are more
loyal to their tribe than to their friends, their country, or any other
social group. This appears
logical to me. Tribalism
has been defined by one source in describing the engaged theory as a
“way of being” based upon variable combinations of kinship-based
organization, reciprocal exchange, manual production, oral
communication, and analogical enquiry.
They offer that ontologically, tribalism is oriented around
the valences (Attractive coverings) of analogy, genealogy and mythology.
This means that customary tribes have their social foundations in
some variation of these tribal orientations, while at the same time
often taking on traditional practices (including through religions of
the book such as Christianity and Islam), and modern practices,
including monetary exchange, mobile communications, and modern
education. I
have provided the aforementioned in an effort to offer a wider view of
mankind, its varied living and cultural structures, its true face, and
the face which many would like it to have.
As the facts suggest, its true face is one covered with war paint
and given to actions that have often resulted in the death and
destruction of others. Further,
I would suggest that each NACSMT migration following the first NACSMT
entry into North America was in fact an invasion and colonialization of
the lands held by those having lived there previously.
Therefore, this I see as the basis for further discussion of the
NACSMT. I’m
not a historian. This
provides me with tremendous freedom to research and present information
based upon the facts, not what others want to hear.
This is my family history. It
involves my family and my Spanish progenitors.
Good or bad, their history is what it is.
They were of European tribes which migrated like other
tribes into a geographic land mass (North America) and took possession
of it. This is no different
from other human tribes that migrated into the North American Continent,
settled, and exerted control over their environment.
Here, I suggest that one should apply the facts equally. Allow
me to clarify my position on these matters lest the reader misinterpret
my opinions. The obvious
questions are: Was the taking possession of the land done at the expense
of other? The answer is,
yes! Did they do things
perfectly? The answer is,
no! Were the other tribes
that they were in competition with for those lands and its resources
perfect humans devoid of evil and greed?
The answer is, no! In
essence, humans will be human. After
all, all tribes are human. Fortunately,
I don’t have a publisher to which I’m responsible and accountable
for a finished product in which they have the ultimate say-so.
I’m also not an academic teaching in an institution of higher
learning. Therefore, I have
no pressures brought upon me by department chairs, college or university
administrators, or other stakeholders to ensure that I remain
politically correct. There
are no members of NACSMT (Native-American or Indigenous peoples)
exerting undo pressure upon me or providing financial incentives (Casino
owning tribes) with which to obtain concessions from me on presenting
material in a way which is more palatable to them.
There are no individuals or groups of European extraction that
have or are applying pressure of any kind on the input or outcomes of
this chapter. Finally, there
are no Black tribes or other Asian tribal peoples exerting pressure upon
me. To
be sure, American history (History for dummies) is now often presented
briefly and simplistically in order to accommodate the intended
audience. People no longer
read with the intensity they once did.
Our culture is now less paper-based friendly and more digital
“Internet” driven in informational delivery areas.
Unfortunately for all, this chapter will be neither, simple nor
palatable for some. So let
us begin. Once
upon a time there were no humans on the North American Continent.
None of the tribes of the earth had yet reached it.
It was beautiful and teeming with life.
Then, the NACSMT or those who are now called “Indigenous” or
“Native-Americans” arrived. The
term “Indigenous” is currently used when applying a label to
“Native-Americans.” In
its strictest sense it means, “Originating or occurring naturally in a
particular place; native.” Neither
applies, as these originated in Siberia and either migrated to, or
invaded and colonized the Americas. The
term “Native” means, “Being the place or environment in which a
person was born or a thing came into being: one's native land.”
Clearly the first portion would apply to all who have been born
in North America. However, I
would argue that NACSMT did not come into being in the Americas.
They came into being in Siberia and migrated/settled or later
invaded/colonized the Americas. To
clarify, there are no Indigenous or Native peoples to the North American
continent. No human came
into being there. Instead,
we are told by the scientific community that now specialize in the study
of human DNA that peoples of many kinds migrated onto the
continent from other places. Therefore,
we are all migrants. However,
to be fair, the first NACSMT did migrate and settle earlier, with the
second and third waves of NACSMT invading and colonizing. These
scientific specialists suggest that all humans on the planet result
from coming into being in Africa. We
are told that they then migrating out of Africa, populating the
entire planet. Thus, we
Americans are all the result of migrations/invasions from other places
to this place.
Therefore,
we must set aside the fact that some tribes migrated or invaded
the North American Continent earlier than others. It
should not be necessary to give preferential treatment to any human
tribe. If this is not the
case, all should return to Africa and end themselves there. The
United States is a relatively new nation. It
is now in the throes of tribal finger pointing and blame for all of the
current failings of the nation. The
European tribes are asked to accept blame for their inappropriate
actions against the other non-European tribes.
These non-European tribes also claim that the European-based
tribal advancements in technology and economic advancement are by and
large due to their efforts as they were derived from slave labor and the
taking of lands and property rightfully belonging to them. Those
descendents of the European tribes counter with the response that
without them, their technology, and expertise there would have been no
progress. Therefore, the
fruits of that progress rightfully should remain with them, their
offspring, and those others creating more wealth.
As the plot thickens, all of today’s American tribes (Both
NACSMT and Non-NACSMT) continue to jockey for position using government
institutions and the media to obtain what they see as their just
rewards, even at the expense of others. As
these solutions are not practical, America and its many tribes must
attend to other solutions to resolve our longstanding differences.
It is also suggested that one must accept that for some problems
there are no perfect solutions. Thus,
we might consider a series of accommodations to relieve the emotional
and material aspects of those differences and move on with it.
Given the nature of the grievances, tribal competition, and
reduced resources for which all vie the ultimate end-game appears to be
that of an inevitable collision course.
In any event, we must push past these difficulties and continue
with our chapter. One
study of DNA taken from dozens of human groups labeled as
“Native-American” (Spanning from Canada to the tip of South America)
has assisted in clarifying a question which has long puzzled scientists.
When did humans arrive in the Americas?
Harvard-led researchers have proven that they came in successive
waves (Migrations/Invasions) more than 15,000 years ago. Note: An
international team of researchers including members of the Institute of
Cytology and Genetics, a part of the Russian Academy of Sciences, has
concluded that the genetic home of the first Americans was Altai in
Central Asia, where Russia, China, Mongolia and Kazakhstan come together.
This would suggest that these NACSMT peoples were for a time
indigenous to those regions. Approximately
20-25 thousand years ago, the ancestors of what we call today, the
Native-Americans, originated there.
They then migrated and colonized Siberia. They
later migrated/invaded the North America Continent and settled/colonized
it. Notes: Further
analysis reveals that “First Americans” (One population of NACSMT)
crossed a land bridge from Siberia during the last Ice Age.
This approach would assume that there were other groups which
became Americans through later invasions.
These Siberian Mongoloid tribes are descended from
populations that lived in northern and central Asia about 15,000 to
20,000 years ago and through a series of migrations and invasions
entered the North American Continent and then settled or colonized
multiple areas across it. This
group of Siberian tribes (NACSMTs) gave rise to most of those we today
label as Native-Americans or Indigenous.
At this juncture, it might be said that one person’s indigenous
are another person’s migrants or invaders.
I’m sure this would depend greatly upon one’s desired
political and economic outcomes given a particular agenda. Further
findings suggest that there were at least two subsequent migrations
(invasions) by NACSMT. These
humans then mixed with the founding group (First Americans).
They left traces of their genes in the DNA of present-day
populations in Alaska, Greenland, and Canada.
The two later groups of NACSMT would then become the 2nd and 3rd
wave of North Americans. In
order to pay proper respect to these early migrants to the Americas, I
will now refer to them as the NACSMT
rather than Indigenous or Native-American. There
exist common themes in the major stages of the history of human
migration and settlement of Siberia.
Unfortunately, current archeological, anatomical, linguistic and
genetic data does not provide a complete story.
Precise findings related to the anatomically modern humans in the
Old World Arctic are still not available.
However, it is proposed that the first people lived in Siberia
during the Upper Paleolithic as early as 45,000
B.C.E.-40,000 B.C.E. The
Archaeological evidence indicates that the settlement of Siberia was a
complex and lengthy process. Migrations
originating from southern Russia, Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and
Mongolia are the most logical conclusions for the origin of these
tribes. The
term "mongoloid" was introduced by early ethnology primarily
to describe various Central and East Asian populations.
It is one of the proposed three major races (Caucasoid,
Mongoloid, and Negroid) of humanity.
Mongoloid is also used to refer to the general physical type of
some or all of the populations of East Asia, Central Asia, Southeast
Asia, Eastern Russia, the Arctic, the Americas, parts of the Pacific
Islands, and parts of South Asia. As to those labeled, Native-Americans (NACSMT),
Genetic studies strongly suggest the certainty of the Siberian
Hypothesis. Y-chromosome DNA
analysis has revealed that a substantial majority of NACSMT
belong to the otherwise fairly rare
haplogroup Q. Q also happens
to be common in Siberia, especially among some of the smaller indigenous
groups there. Among the Ket,
Haplogroup Q reaches a 95 percent frequency.
However, this could represent genetic drift, as the Ket
population is very small at around 1,500. The Y-DNA Haplogroup R1 is the second most important haplogroup
among those labeled “Indigenous” peoples of the Americas.
R1’s frequency is highest in the Americas among the Algonquian
peoples of the northeastern United States and eastern Canada.
R1 is rare in eastern Siberia.
However, it is widespread among certain south-central Siberian
groups. It should be noted
that Haplogroup R1 among certain NACSMT
tribes is reported to have come from south-central Siberia.
However, it may be a result of recent European admixture and its
origin remains uncertain. The third major Y-DNA haplogroup found among
NACSMT tribes is Haplogroup C.
C is also relatively widespread in Siberia.
It is even more common in the Pacific and among indigenous
Australians. There are
scholars who attribute Haplogroup C to the first out-of-Africa migration
which took the coastal route along Southern Asia and into Southeast Asia
and Australia some 50,000 years ago.
However, North American migrant Siberian tribes such as some Na-Dené,
Algonquian, or Siouan-speaking populations, Siberians, and Central
Asians share the more restricted C3 sub-haplogroup.
Many Pacific groups have the C2 sub-haplogroup.
Australians Aborigines are represented by the C4 sub-haplogroup. The first of three “NACSMT”
migrations to the Western Hemisphere and initial settlement of the
Americas appears to have been only from this ancestral Beringian
population. Other lines of
evidence including linguistics and have long suggested that the Na-Dené
people (those who speak Athabascan and related languages) arrived in a
second wave. This is set at
around 8,000 B.C.E. Linguist
Edward Vajda has linked the Na-Dené languages to the Ket language of
Central Siberia. The Dené-Yeniseian hypothesis remains controversial.
Genetically, the Na-Dené show some particularities that also
indicate that their “migration occurred from the Russian Far East
after the initial Paleo-Indian colonization.”
A third migration stream is suggested which originated in Siberia
and ended in the Americas. According
to both linguistic and genetic evidence the ancestors of the
“Eskimo-Aleut” peoples seems to date back to around 4,000
B.C.E. Some Y-DNA markers show a closer connection between
NACSMT and the indigenous inhabitants of
south-central Siberian than to those of the northern or eastern parts of
the region. In addition, it
appears that certain mitochondrial DNA markers also show descent along
the maternal line. As stated
earlier, one study specifically indicates strong genetic linkages
between NACSMT and the indigenous
inhabitants of the southern Altai Mountains, a rugged area situated near
the intersection of southern Siberia, western Mongolia, and eastern
Kazakhstan. This
research would suggest that North America was reached by human
populations by crossing the Bering land bridge during the last glacial
period (Some contend that the end of the age is defined as 9,700 calendar years BCE
(before the Common Era).
Others offer that the Pleistocene Epoch is typically defined as the time
period that began about 1.8 million years ago and lasted until about
11,700 years ago. The most
recent Ice Age occurred then, as glaciers covered huge parts of the
planet Earth. The
so-called Paleo-Indian period is accepted to have lasted until about
10,000 years ago (The beginning of the Archaic or Meso-Indian period.).
Paleo-Indians are a classification term given to those first
peoples (NACSMT) who migrated into the Americas during the final glacial
episodes of the late Pleistocene period. From
16,500 B.C.E.-13,500 B.C.E., ice-free corridors developed along the Pacific coast
and valleys of North America. These
corridors enabled animals to migrate south into the interior.
These were followed by humans.
The humans (NACSMT) walked or used primitive boats along the
coastline. There
is also evidence which suggests that big-animal hunters crossed the
Bering Strait from Eurasia into North America over a land and ice bridge
that existed between 45,000 B.C.E.-12,000 B.C.E. These
small, isolated groups of hunter-gatherers (NACSMT) migrated
alongside herds of large herbivores far into Alaska.
There are stone tools, particularly projectile points and
scrapers, which have come to be used as primary evidence of the earliest
human activity in the Americas.
These crafted lithic flaked tools are currently used by
archaeologists and anthropologists in order to classify cultural
periods. To
finalize, there exists scientific evidence which links NACSMT
to Asian peoples, specifically to eastern Siberian
populations. These migrants/invaders
(Labeled Indigenous peoples) to the Americas have been linked to
Siberian populations by: ·
Linguistic factors ·
Distribution of blood types ·
Genetic composition (As
reflected by molecular data, such as DNA) The
preceding clarification was necessary in order to contextualize the
migration/invasion of various NACSMT human
tribes onto the North American continent. Notes: Now
we will discuss the United States’, Southwest.
It was here that my progenitors came in 1599 C.E. As to the
American Southwest, today's anthropologists use the term "Basketmakers"
when they refer to these NACSMT
or prehistoric desert dwellers.
Living in the Four Corners area they were influenced by the
Mongollon people (Other NACSMT). They
lived in the Southwest from approximately 300
C.E. until sometime around 1300
C.E. Mongollon people
invaded the area 1300 years before the Spaniards. It
is reported that they left 300 years before Don Juan de Oñate y Salazar (1550 C.E.-1626 C.E.)
and his Spaniards arrived to claim New Mexico for the Spanish Crown. To
this point in the discussion, we can see that the NACSMT did what many other human tribes do, they migrated and/or invaded.
As we shall see, some ran from more hostile tribes (Other NACSMT),
others migrated to where food was plentiful.
Still others migrated/invaded to explore and learn from their new
surroundings. Now, we shall begin to explore those NACSMT
which migrated/invaded to the areas in which the Spanish would also
later invade. There
were several Mogollon groups (NACSMT) clustered within roughly one
hundred miles east and west of the New Mexico and Arizona border and
extending some distance southward into Chihuahua and Sonora.
These westernmost groups with their Brownware Ceramics gave one
definition to the Mogollon culture.
Another of their groups which was closely related culturally, the
Jornado Mogollon, spanned another two hundred miles eastward, very near
to the Great Plains. They
also extended themselves some distance southward, into Chihuahua.
These Mogollon groups were then widely separated into different
environments. They
progressed at different rates through three basic phases of cultural
development (Others might say savagery, barbarism, and civilization).
Later, they became known as the Anasazi. By
500 C.E., the Anasazi (Also
NACSMT) would invade areas with more
predictable water supplies. These
included the Rio Grande Valley, along the Pecos River. They
also conquered the present-day Zuni and Acoma lands of west central New
Mexico. To be sure, these
NACSMT did in fact invade and war
against one another. Later,
the Anasazi would move from their high-walled towns to become the Pueblo
Indians. The peoples (Also
NACSMT) of the nineteen New Mexico
Indian pueblos can trace their beginnings to the Anasazi. This
word "pueblo" refers to a unique Indian culture of the
Southwest. They shared
common cultural elements with them. New
Mexico prehistoric treasures are their creations. Each
pueblo presided over its own government.
Each of the nineteen pueblos had their own social order and
religious practices. The
most obvious link that the peoples of the pueblos shared was language. When
the Spanish arrived they found one of five distinct languages Tewa, Tiwa,
Towa, Keresan or Zunian, being spoken at each pueblo.
My Spanish ancestors, the De Riberas, understood that the word
“Pueblo” referred to a group of tribes. As
the Four Corners Anasazi cultures declined, the river valleys west of
their hunting grounds became flooded with Anasazi refugees.
Sometime after 1130 C.E. and before 1180 C.E.,
the "Ancient Ones," or "Anasazi" the Navajo
developed into a vast, civilized culture.
Their world stretched from northern Mexico to southern Colorado. When
the Spanish arrived, they found permanent mud-brick settlements all
along the Rio Grande and near other waterways. Calling
them "pueblos," after the villages or pueblos they left behind
in Spain, the Spanish dedicated each one to a Catholic saint. In
this way each village had patron saint for protection and worship. These
amazing Pueblo cliff dwellings, pit houses, ancient kivas, and abandoned
cities litter the ancient trade routes of the Southwest. They
exist today as mysterious symbols etched in rock standing as monuments
to a glorious past of highly developed native cultures. It
is estimated that around the 1100s
C.E. or almost five hundred years before the Spaniards arrived, the
first Puebloans began building rock and mud villages in the Pecos
valley. Over the next two
centuries, more than two dozen villages were erected including one where
the Pecos Pueblo stands today. By
the 14th Century C.E., small
villages were abandoned and the Pecos Pueblo expanded. By
the year 1450 C.E., the complex was a well-planned frontier fortress, five
stories high, with a population of approximately two thousand Puebloan (NACSMT)
members. It
must be noted here that a few NACSMT (Indigenous) societies in the
regions of North America closest to the Mesoamerican and South American
cultures practiced human sacrifice.
Mesoamerica is the region and cultural area in the Americas,
extending approximately from central Mexico to Belize, Guatemala, El
Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and northern Costa Rica. There,
pre-Columbian societies flourished before the Spanish colonization of
the Americas in the 15th and 16th
centuries C.E. Archaeologists
have found evidence of human sacrifice among the Anasazi at Chaco
Canyon, New Mexico and Cahokia, Illinois.
Archaeologists working at Chaco Canyon have found evidence that
the elite (who appeared to be Mesoamericans, not Indigenous) butchered
humans and boiled them into stews. The
Pueblo Indians, who are most probably descendants of the Anasazi, have
expressed their outrage at the thought of being accused of cannibalism.
However, in fairness to the archaeologists involved, they were
theorizing that the Pueblo’s ancestors had been the victims of human
sacrifice, not the practitioners. Unfortunately,
scientists are forced by their scientific educational discipline to
report the findings of their research.
At times, this reporting may cause some discomfort to those who
may have ancestors impacted by those findings.
As politically incorrect as this is, these poor unfortunates are
duty bound to report the facts. As
much as this distresses the adherents to the “Noble Savage”
scenario, those facts are a necessary part of modern scientific study
and research. Also,
archaeologists working at Sleeping Ute Mountain in Colorado excavated an
Anasazi site, found signs of cannibalism, a stone tool kit possibly used
to remove human flesh from bones, and preserved human fecal matter
possibly containing human blood from victims.
The final determination has not been made on this matter.
One can only guess what the future holds for the final results of
this research. From
the north, came the Southwest's latest-arriving human tribes, the
Athapascans or Apachean family (Also NACSMT).
They invaded into a relatively placid land where they were
divided into two related groups: Modern-day, Apache and Navajo. These
tribes fought out territorial differences and colonized. The
Apachean family is also known as ápachu, means “Enemy.”
These migrating Athabascan-speaking peoples invaded the American
Southwest from the far north of Canada sometime in the Late-1300’s
C.E. and early 1400’s C.E.
or some three hundred years before the Spanish
These tribal groups both hunted and gathered.
Most scholars agree that the ancestors of the Navajo and Apache
originally lived in western Canada, probably on the northern Plains of
Alberta before invading south and colonizing the Southwest. Findings
from archaeology suggest four different migration routes used by
these NACSMT: An intermountain route through western Colorado and
eastern Utah; A Rocky Mountain route through central Colorado; A High
Plains route through eastern Colorado; and a Plains border route through
Kansas. Their
newly colonized American home territories included Arizona, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, Texas, and the Great Plains.
Their languages became known as Chiricahua, Jicarilla, Lipan,
Plains Apache, Mescalero and Western Apache.
The Zuni, a Pueblo people, gave them the name “Enemy.” Here,
I must defend the NACSMT. Their
reasons for killing or making war were simple. They raided each other
for horses, women, and sometimes over control of lands.
Later, the NACSMT would develop and enlarge their living areas
and create national boundaries. In
order to defend these, border wars would arise. By
1599 C.E.,
their chief enemies were the Spanish.
Later, the Comanche (Also NACSMT), Mexicans, and Americanos began
to make war against them. This
was no easy matter for these new invaders as the Apache were known as
great warriors and intelligent tacticians in battles. The
Navajo and Apache colonists, as well as, other nomadic and semi-nomadic
groups enriched New Mexico's NACSMT legacy. The
word Navajo for this NACSMT tribe comes
from the phrase Tewa Navahu, meaning “highly cultivated lands.” The
Navajo reside in New Mexico and Arizona. Archaeologists
believe that the Navajo people first invaded what they now consider
their ancestral homeland around 1025
C.E. When the Navajo
first invaded they survived as hunters and gatherers.
Before long they joined the Apaches and began raiding the Pueblo
Indians for food, women, and slaves.
When the Spanish invaded the area they called them Apaches de
Navajo. This was in an
attempt to distinguish the Navajo from their neighbors the Apaches. Notes:
The Mogollon were an
ancient NACSMT culture which migrated into the present-day United
States-Mexican border region of southern New Mexico and Arizona and
northern Sonora and Chihuahua states in Mexico.
These NACSMT are one of the four major archaeological Prehistoric
Southwestern cultural divisions of the American Southwest and Northern
Mexico. They lived in the
southwest from approximately 300 C.E. until sometime around 1300
C.E. Mogollon origins are a matter of intense research.
One view holds that the Mogollon emerged from a preceding
"Desert Archaic" tradition that links Mogollon ancestry with
the first (late Pleistocene) prehistoric human migration into, and
occupation of, the area around 9000
B.C.E. This model
suggests that cultural distinctions emerged in the region when these NACSMT populations grew large enough to establish villages, and later, larger
communities. A second
hypothesis suggests that the Mogollon were descendants of early farmers
who invaded from farming regions in Central Mexico around 3500
B.C.E. and displacing descendants of the antecedent Desert Archaic
peoples. A third view
suggests that during the time of the shift from hunter/gather society to
agriculture the Cochise culture (the early pit-house, late Desert
Archaic, antecedents of the Mogollon) had been invaders into the
area about 5000 B.C.E. This
view would suggest that they were not linked to the earlier inhabitants,
but were receptive to cultural dissemination from other NACSMT tribes. Gradually,
through contact with the Pueblo Indians the Navajo learned to farm,
weave, paint, and make both pottery and baskets.
They lived in small homes called hogans.
At this time they were generally cone shaped and held up by logs
and poles. The Navajo originally
began their tribes in the 1500’s
C.E. They traded maize
(corn crops) and woven cotton items such as blankets for items such as
bison meat and various materials that they could use to make tools and
weapons. As
stated earlier, Apaches and the Navajos (NACSMT)
shared
a common Athapascan heritage. Among
New Mexico's non-Pueblo Indians, the Navajo Nation was by far the
largest group of NACSMT in New Mexico.
Most of these lived on the almost 7,500 square miles of surreal
mesa lands in the State's northwestern quadrant. These
mastered the loom and became proficient silver workers, while the
Apaches became skilled at basket weaving. The Navajo homes were
very simple, just a small shelter of wooden sticks, mud, and tree bark. Known
as hogans, these homes and their doors faced the east to ensure an
abundance of sunshine.
Over
time, with environmental or other stresses, it is suggested that warfare
(Raiding and retaliation for raids) became commonplace, considered an
almost a normal occurrence. Typically,
this involved the capture of horses, sheep, and women which enhancement
the status of each tribe. When the Spaniards
arrived (Invaded) the NACSMT territory in the 1600’s
C.E., the Navajo began using the Spanish Churra sheep for clothing
and food. They also
strategically placed trading posts within the Spanish towns to barter
with their handmade items, to obtain items they needed, and gather
intelligence on their Spanish guests which they would use for war. As the Navajo raids
continued on the camps of the Spaniards (Late-
16th Century C.E. through 1821 C.E.), and later the
Mexicans (1821 C.E. through 1846
C.E.), the Spaniards took military action against this
NACSMT tribe. Spanish
warfare was used to intimidate them. Eventually,
approximately two thirds of Navajo surrendered. These
enforced actions by the Hispanos caused the Navajo to move to new
territories including Utah. Those
who refused to surrender hid in the mountains and the canyons to avoid
being detained and restrained. Later (1846
C.E. to Present), the Americanos would invade and colonize the land.
This NACSMT tribe eventually
settled into a reservation on Fort Sumter in the Late-1800’s
C.E. By then, they had
begun raising sheep, providing them with a prosperous and profitable
life. The
most widely accepted origin theory suggests Apache was borrowed and
transliterated from the Zuni word ʔa·paču meaning
"Navajos" (the plural of paču "Navajo").
A second theory suggests the term comes from Yavapai ʔpačə
meaning "enemy." The
Zuni and Yavapai sources are less certain because de Oñate used the
term before he had encountered any Zuni or Yavapai.
By the 1640s C.E., the
Spanish applied the term to southern Athabaskan peoples from the Chama
on the east to the San Juan on the west.
The ultimate origin is uncertain and lost to Spanish history. For
centuries, these were constantly at enmity with the Spaniards and later
the Mexicans. The first
Apache raids on Sonora took have taken place during the Late-17th
Century C.E. against the Spanish Empire. The
Jicarilla Apache Nation is
located in the mountains and rugged mesas of northern New Mexico.
The Mescalero Apache
Tribe has three sub-bands that comprise the Tribe: the Mescalero Apache,
the Chiricahua Apache, and the Lipan Apache. Prior
to the Americano Reservation Period, the Mescalero people were nomadic
hunters and gathers and roamed freely across the Southwest. Another of the NACSMT,
the Cheyenne,
would come onto the scene. Their
language is of the Algonquian language family. They
comprise two Native American groups, the Só'taeo'o or Só'taétaneo'o
(more commonly spelled as Suhtai or Sutaio) and the Tsétsêhéstâhese
(also spelled Tsitsistas). Their
oral tradition offers that they lived far to the northeast in what is
now known as Canada. It
would appear that there was a time of great sickness causing this people
to leave their homeland and invade south. This
NACSMT refers to this as the “ancient time.” It
was a period when they were happy in their native lands but were
decimated by terrible disease. They
next invaded and colonized the marshy areas between
Ontario and what is now known as Minnesota. According
to their tradition, they were living by a large body of water. Prior
to living in Minnesota, they did not farm instead this tribe lived by
fishing, hunting, and gathering wild plant foods.
It was there that they learned farming from the other NACSMT in
the area. The tribe called
this the “time of the dogs.” This
was when dogs were used as beasts of burden. It
was while in Minnesota that the Cheyenne made one of their first
contacts with Europeans. The
earliest known written historical record of the Cheyenne comes to us
from the Mid-17th Century C.E., when a group of Cheyenne visited the French
Fort Crevecoeur, near present-day Peoria, Illinois.
The Cheyenne at this time lived between the Mississippi River and
Mille Lacs Lake in present-day Minnesota. By
about 1635 C.E., the tribe
began its slow invasion westward toward the Great Plains. Their
invasion may have been motivated in part by the westward expansion of
the neighboring Sioux, Iroquois, and Anishinaabe tribes. However,
the many villages that made up the Cheyenne did not move all at once,
rather they invaded piecemeal. Archaeological
data offers that it may have taken over two centuries for the different
groups to invade west of the Mississippi River and into the Great
Plains. Notes:
The Pawnee tribal land
had at one time included most of what is now Nebraska. It
had been reduced to only the land between the Platte the Republican
Rivers. The right to this
land was challenged by the larger Plains tribes, the Comanche, Cheyenne,
Utes, Arapahoes, and especially the Sioux. By
the 1870's C.E., the Pawnee Nation numbered approximately 4,000. By 1873
C.E., a Sioux war party ambushed a Pawnee hunting party in southern
Nebraska. They killed
approximately 150 of their enemy, including Sky Chief, before an army
detachment was able to come to their rescue.
The site is known as Massacre Canyon. The Cheyenne is one of
the groups of indigenous people of the Great Plains and their language
is of the Algonquian language family. They
were at times allied with the Lakota and Arapaho. Nothing in the Cheyenne
legends recalls migration to the North American Continent. Oral
tradition offers that the first Cheyenne lived under ground and were led
to the surface by one of their more adventuresome people, who, following
a small source of light, discovered the world above them. It
is suspected that the Cheyenne were originally from North of the
Missouri River on a large lake. They
lived in the area of what is now Minnesota at the time they first came
in contact with Europeans. The
Cheyenne occupied a region populated by the Algonquin speaking people. It
is reported that they began their tribal invasions from the shores of
the Great Lakes or the upper Mississippi River area.
They appear in historical records on a map attributed to Joliet
and drawn about 1673 C.E. More
definite is a visit of a group of Indians, named "Chaa" or
Cheyenne to the LaSalle Expedition while they were building Fort
Crevecoeur on the Illinois in February, 1680
C.E. They
invaded west across the Mississippi River and into North and South
Dakota in the Early-18th Century
C.E. The Cheyenne Nation
or Tsêhéstáno was at one time composed of ten bands which spread
across the Great Plains from southern Colorado to the Black Hills in
South Dakota. By 1700
C.E., many of the Cheyenne bands were living in the Sheyenne River
Valley in eastern North Dakota. More
bands continued invading west across the Mississippi River and into
North and South Dakota in the Early-18th
Century C.E. Here, they
further adopted a farming life-style of the tribes of that region
planting corn, beans, and squash. There
they lived in villages constructed of semi-subterranean earth lodges. The
Plains Cree, Plains Ojibwa, and Assiniboine began forcing the Cheyenne
farther west by the Mid-1700s C.E.
The Cheyenne then re-established themselves in the Black Hills
area of South Dakota and the Powder River Country of present-day
Montana. While there it has
been noted that they acquired more horses and became nomadic buffalo
hunters from the first American Indian groups to adopt the horse who
acquired horses from the Spanish in exchange for buckskins and or slaves
for buffalo hunting. Notes: By the 1600s
C.E., there were Spanish missions and settlers living on ranches in
New Mexico just to the west of Texas.
There the Pueblo and Navaho Indians also lived.
The Spanish of New Mexico allowed the Indians to learn about
horses working on the Spanish ranches.
The Spanish government had laws making it illegal for an Indian
to own a horse or a gun. Yet,
the Indians learned how to train and ride a horse.
They also learned how to use horses to carry packs. In 1680
C.E., the Pueblo Indians revolted against the Spanish was savage and
well-planned, driving the Spanish from New Mexico.
This forced the Spanish to leave quickly, leaving behind many
horses. It is reported that
the Indian nations obtained their horses by the 1680s
C.E.-1690s C.E. With
horses they were able to move out of the Great Plains to live and to
hunt more easily. The
Spanish did not return to New Mexico until the year of 1694
C.E. While the Spanish
were gone the Pueblo Indians raised large herds of these horses and
began selling and trading them to other tribes such as the Kiowa and
Comanche. The Pueblo Indians
also taught the other Indian tribes how to ride and properly raise the
horses. The use of horses by
the various tribes spread across the Southern Plains very quickly.
French traders reported that the Cheyenne Tribe in Kansas got
their first horses in the year of 1745
C.E. Horses transformed life
for the tribes of the Great Plains.
They were able to give up framing in the river valley and rely
upon hunting on the plains instead.
The evidence of this is in the Cheyenne legends which recalls the
times when they “lost the corn.”
Also, before obtaining horses they hunted buffalo on foot.
The Buffalo were not easy to hunt on foot, as they sped away
faster than the human hunter could run after them.
With a horse, the hunters could give chase and keep up with the
buffalo. Groups of hunters
would ride horses up to a heard of buffalo.
Once close enough, and before the buffalo run away they shot
arrows at them. In addition, many tribes
used buffalo traps to catch large numbers of the animals.
Even the Blackfeet women aided in the hunt.
Sometimes they made a semi-circular fence out of their dog
travois and the braves chased a herd into the trap. They then dispatch
them with arrow and lance. Another
technique involved stampeding a herd over a cliff, with hunters
stationed below. These
finished-off the buffalo. This
method continued after the use of the horse because a huge supply of
meat and skins could thus be acquired in a very short time.
One of the favorite spots used by Platte River Indians for
buffalo chase was the bluffs near present Interstate 25 in Wyoming's
Chugwater Valley. With
the help of horses the Plains Indians became more nomadic.
As nomads they always moved from place to place looking for food.
They carried everything they owned with them.
Before horses, these Indians carried everything on foot or used
dogs as beasts of burden. The
dogs were fitted with travois and carrying packs which acted as
saddlebags. Both aided in
the carrying of belongings. As
they moved out onto the plains they migrated southwestward. By the 1700s
C.E., the Cheyenne acquired horses from the Spanish and became
expert buffalo hunters and raiders. In 1717
C.E., the Cheyenne Indian Chief Orejas de Conejos (Rabbit Ear) and
his warriors roamed the area around Clayton, New Mexico.
Historians tell us that representatives from the areas
surrounding Santa Fe, the most northern part of New Spain (Now New
Mexico) met in Santa Fe with the purpose of wanting the Cheyenne to
release the Spanish prisoners they held as slaves. There,
they organized a volunteer army. Chosen
to command the army was Don Juan de Padilla, Carlos Fernandez, and Padro
Pino. 500 young men armed,
mounted, and with pack mules were selected.
They assembled for the expedition carrying firearms, lances, and
bows and arrows. The Spanish military
expedition left Santa Fe heading for the Orejas de Conejos to engage the
Comanche tribe in battle. As
the Spaniards knew this mountain by name, it must have been named before
the date the great Cheyenne Chief was killed in battle and buried on top
of the mountain that bears his name.
This defeat of the Comanches was to be one of the bloodiest
battles against southwestern Indians in western history. The expedition camped
the first night at the Pueblo of Pecos. It
then moved by way of Anton Chico to the plains in what is now
North-western Texas. There
they learned that the Comanches were camped a few leagues ahead. Preparations
were made to attack at daylight. The
Spanish found an undefended path to the teepee camp of the Comanches. Once
there, they attacked killing hundreds, taking 700 prisoners, and
liberating the Spanish captives. So
severe was the punishment of the punitive Spanish expedition that the
Comanches never again went on the warpath against the Spaniards. Having
settled the Black Hills, they introduced the horse culture to Lakota
bands about 1730 C.E. Allied
with the Arapaho, the Cheyenne pushed the Kiowa to the Southern Plains. In
turn, they were pushed west by the more numerous Lakota. While
in the Black Hills, they encountered the Arapaho who had already moved
from Minnesota into the Black Hills in the Dakotas and Wyoming first. The
Arapaho did not view the Cheyenne as intruders instead welcoming them as
friends. In time, the tribes intermarried and became confederated. Horses
had spread across the southern Plains rapidly.
French traders reported that the Cheyenne Indians in Kansas
obtained their first horses in the year of 1745
C.E. Before horses, the
Cheyenne had hunted deer and grew crops, such as squash, beans, and
corn. When they grew crops,
the Cheyenne lived in wigwams made out of birch-bark and dirt. When
they didn't have horses they used dogsleds instead. Once
they gave up farming, the Cheyenne traded animal hides with other tribes
for fish, corn, tobacco, and fruit.
After they became nomads, meaning that they never lived in one
place for a long time but kept moving instead, they lived in tepees,
which were easy to break down and rebuild. Toward
the end of the 18th Century C.E., pressure from the Teton Sioux pushed more of the
Cheyenne farther west. This
migration was also carried out piecemeal.
It is also reported that one reason why the Cheyenne and others
moved to the Great Plains is to escape from the ravages of European
diseases. By 1795
C.E., a smallpox epidemic wiped out 30 of the 32 Arikara villages,
killing approximately 3500 of their 4000 warriors. At
some point, the Tribe moved further west along the Cheyenne River,
finally settling in two areas on the Great Plains the Northern Cheyenne
near the Platte River and the Southern Cheyenne near the Arkansas River.
The Great Plains is the broad expanse of flat land, much of it
covered in prairie, steppe and grassland that lie west of the
Mississippi River tallgrass prairie states and east of the Rocky
Mountains in the United States and Canada.
This would include the Woodland areas of the Mississippi River
Valley. These areas covered
parts, but not all, of the states of Colorado, Kansas, Montana,
Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and
Wyoming, and the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Manitoba and
Saskatchewan. The
Southern Cheyenne allied with their neighbors the Arapaho, and they
fought the Kiowa, Comanche, and Apache.
But later, the five tribes made peace and became allies.
The Southern Cheyenne joined with the Arapaho, forming a large
tribe that spread out over a large area.
When American settlers arrived, the Cheyenne territory covered
Oklahoma, Montana, South Dakota, parts of Wyoming, Nebraska, Colorado,
and Kansas. By
the 19th Century C.E., as a
result of adopting the horse culture they soon developed ritual
ceremonies and tribal structures which resulted in a more centralized
approach to authority. The
Cheyenne are reported to have still maintained some villages which were
planting corn along the Missouri River in 1800
C.E. Their
tribal existence was well adapted to life on the plains. Tribal
institutions were both meaningful and well-integrated. They
implemented a practical government system and a religion or super
naturalism related directly to the environment in which they lived. They
had a satisfying economy, maintained orderly family and kinship systems,
and made alliances with other powerful, friendly tribes. There
were rivalries which developed between bands as their numbers increased
which developed into antagonism between band members and chiefs.
These finally led to the tribe dividing being into the Northern
and Southern divisions. By
the Early-1800's C.E., the
Cheyenne ranged widely to the southwest of the Missouri River. A
French trader, Persine duLuc’ noted that, although the Cheyenne
wandered the greatest part of the year, they sowed, near their
"cottages" (the Cheyenne built earth lodges to live in, some
more than 40' in diameter) maize (corn) and tobacco, which they came to
reap at the beginning of autumn. About
1804 C.E., when the Lewis and
Clark Expedition came upon the Cheyenne along the Missouri River their
numbers were estimated at about 300-400 fighting men. However,
Clark did not come in contact with the entire tribe. It
is estimated that the tribe actually numbered between 1400 and 1600
persons. He described the
Cheyenne as "rich in horses and dogs, the dogs carry a great deal
of their light baggage. They
confess to be at war with no nation, except the Sioux" against whom
they had been fighting wars for as long as they could remember. Rapid
cultural changes took place once the Cheyenne were on the plains. After
only two generations, Cheyenne living in 1804
C.E.-1806 C.E. near present day Scott's Bluff, NE, on the North
Platte River had completely adjusted to the new environment. After
1825 C.E.,
the Cheyenne began to divide into a Northern tribe and a Southern tribe.
The Southern Cheyenne
continued their close association with the Arapaho while the Northern
Cheyenne developed a close association with the Sioux. When
they gathered, the bands leaders would meet in formal council,
performing an annual Arrow Renewal ceremony, and the Sun Dance. The
military societies of the Cheyenne conducted ceremonial functions such
as their participation in the Sun Dance. However,
more importantly they were also largely responsible for protecting the
tribes and maintaining tribal discipline. The
societies organized themselves either on an age-grade basis or by
continuous membership in a specific society such as, Wolf Soldiers, Fox
soldiers, Dog Soldiers, Red Shields or Bull Soldiers. Later,
the Thunder Bows also known as the Bowstrings were created. The
Cheyenne removal to the Arkansas River did not bring peace to the tribe.
The Early-and-Mid
1830's C.E. were a time of widespread intertribal wars on the
southern and central plains, in which the Cheyenne frequently
participated. It was about
this time frame the Cheyenne and Arapaho formed an alliance. The
Cheyenne had large horse herds and animosity grew between the Cheyenne
and Pawnee over the years. There
was no cessation of hostilities between the 2 tribes during the 1850's
C.E. About 1851
C.E.-1852 C.E., Alights on the Cloud, a prominent Cheyenne chief,
was killed by the Pawnee. The
Cheyenne gathered their allies, the Arapaho, Brule' Sioux and smaller
numbers of Kiowa, Kiowa -Apache, and Crow and followed their sacred
Medicine Arrows and Buffalo Hat into battle against the Pawnee. The
1853 C.E. war against the
Pawnee ended in disaster for the Cheyenne. We
are told that the warriors of the combined tribes could not drive the
Pawnee from a strong defensive position.
The battle supposedly raged indecisively for hours.
Then a body of horsemen appeared.
He was a Pottawatomie and armed with new rifles.
The Pottawatomie alternately advanced by platoons, firing and
retreating. The Plains
Indians were no match for the well organized Pottawatomi warriors, so
the former left the battlefield. In
1854 C.E., the Cheyenne
avenged their defeat. They
and the Kiowa attacked 113 Pawnee and killed almost all of them. They
also continued to war against their traditional enemies, the Crow.
Later (1856 C.E.-1879 C.E.)
they fought the United States Army forces. By
the Mid-19th Century C.E.,
the bands began to split. Some
bands chose to remain near the Black Hills, while others chose to remain
near the Platte Rivers of central Colorado. The tribes continued to
be restless. By the winter
of 1863 C.E.-1864 C.E., Governor Evans of Colorado Territory was
convinced Indian hostilities would begin again in the spring. He
felt tribes could be defeated and hostilities in the Colorado Territory
would be ended. However, by
March of 1864 C.E., Major General Samuel R. Curtiss was forced to withdraw
every available soldier from the Indian frontier to meet an advancing
Confederate force which was by then gathered on the Arkansas River. Governor
Evans had reason to worry about the settlements in the Colorado
Territory. These
NACSMT and others from Siberia provide a rich legacy for the Southwest.
Like all humans tribes they migrated or invaded the lands for
many purposes. They then
settled or colonized those regions starting new lives.
The NACSMT worked the land or hunted for survival.
They built homes large and small.
They also traded and raided.
While trading they acquainted themselves with one another.
These provided on another with what was needed or wanted. Warfare
for the NACSMT became a way of life.
In the beginning, they fought each other.
This continued even after the first Europeans arrived.
When the Spanish invaded and colonized in 1599
C.E., the NACSMT sought their goods and animals.
War was the easiest way to obtain them.
By 1821 C.E., the
Mexicans exerted control after Spain left its areas of New Spain and the
lands fell under the flag of a newly minted nation called “Mexico.”.
War continued the new invaders and colonizers.
When the Americanos defeated the Mexicans and took the lands in 1848
C.E., they invaded and colonized the Southwest. The
NACSMT than began to war against them. From
this time forward, life for the NACSMT would never be the same.
10/29/2015 02:02 PM |